An empirical study of the evidence for contingency theories of management accounting systems in conditions of rapid change

https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(85)90022-4Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper continues the theme of Jones (Accounting, Organizations & Society, 10, 177–200, 1985) which described the findings of an empirical study of the changes introduced into management accounting systems following acquisition. It adopts a contingency theory perspective of the findings; relates them to existing hypotheses; and introduces a test of the theory involving measurement of the control relationships established between acquisition partners. Theoretical expectations for the adaptation of effective post- acquisition MAS are developed and related to success/failure.

References (24)

  • F. Collins

    Managerial Accounting Systems and Organizational Control: A Role Perspective

    Accounting, Organizations and Society

    (1982)
  • The Corporate Report

    (1975)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Drivers of management control systems in tourism start-ups firms

      2021, International Journal of Hospitality Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Contingency theory is principally derived from organizational theory and was later implemented in Management Accounting. Contingency theory belongs to the group of theories called rational theories (Jones, 1985). In its fundamental form, contingency theory assumes that organizational structures depend on environmental factors (Gerdin and Greve, 2008).

    • Organizational culture and post-acquisition changes in management control systems: An analysis of a successful Brazilian case

      2014, Journal of Business Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This criterion was also meant to allow contrasts between the results obtained in this study and those of international studies, which would help identify both similarities and differences in the post-acquisition MCS changes in different contexts. Finally, the third and most important criterion had to do with access to information, deemed by Granlund (2003), Jones (1985a, 1985b) and Nilsson (2002) as one of the most striking difficulties in carrying out this type of research. Therefore, the case study was deliberately chosen considering both the possibility of access to the companies' information and the managerial model of the group, which in this case promotes acquisitions as a means of growth, expansion of portfolio, and increase in the scope of operations geographically.

    • Tax strategy control: The case of transfer pricing tax risk management

      2013, Management Accounting Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Contingency theory is based on the premise that there is no universally appropriate accounting or control system that fits all organisations in all circumstances (Otley, 1980; see Chenhall, 2003, for a review). Instead, according to contingency theorists, accounting and control systems are continuously adjusted to fit the contextual changes that occur in the organisation and its environment (Jones, 1985). The contingency approach thus implies that transfer pricing practices differ between organisations depending on the contextual circumstances.

    • Overhead cost allocation changes in a transfer pricing tax compliant multinational enterprise

      2010, Management Accounting Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      As stressed by Otley (1980), “the contingency approach to management accounting is based on the premise that there is no universally appropriate accounting system which applies equally to all organizations in all circumstances”. Similarly, Jones (1985) states that an organization needs to ensure that specific systems meet organizational goals and motives while being continuously adjusted according to the dynamic changes that take place in organizational and environmental factors. Contingency theory thus implies that different environments require different management practices (McAulay and Tomkins, 1992; Schweikart, 1985).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text