An empirical study of the evidence for contingency theories of management accounting systems in conditions of rapid change
References (24)
An Empirical Study of the Role of Management Accounting Systems Following Takeover or Merger
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1985)The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting: Achievement and Prognosis
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1980)- et al.
A Contingency Framework for Management Accounting Systems Research
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1978) Planning Management Control Systems
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting
(1978)- et al.
Merger Objectives and Organization Structure
Review of Economics and Business
(1962) - et al.
Management Control Systems
(1972) The Formal Theory of Differentiation in Organizations
American Sociological Review
(April 1970)Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance—The Role of Strategic Choice
Sociology
(1972)Managerial and Organizational Factors Associated with Company Performance—Part II, A Contingency Analysis
The Journal of Management Studies
(February 1975)- et al.
Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President
(1974)
Managerial Accounting Systems and Organizational Control: A Role Perspective
Accounting, Organizations and Society
The Corporate Report
Cited by (48)
Drivers of management control systems in tourism start-ups firms
2021, International Journal of Hospitality ManagementCitation Excerpt :Contingency theory is principally derived from organizational theory and was later implemented in Management Accounting. Contingency theory belongs to the group of theories called rational theories (Jones, 1985). In its fundamental form, contingency theory assumes that organizational structures depend on environmental factors (Gerdin and Greve, 2008).
Extrinsic and intrinsic factors in the Balanced Scorecard adoption: An empirical study in Portuguese organizations
2016, European Journal of Management and Business EconomicsOrganizational culture and post-acquisition changes in management control systems: An analysis of a successful Brazilian case
2014, Journal of Business ResearchCitation Excerpt :This criterion was also meant to allow contrasts between the results obtained in this study and those of international studies, which would help identify both similarities and differences in the post-acquisition MCS changes in different contexts. Finally, the third and most important criterion had to do with access to information, deemed by Granlund (2003), Jones (1985a, 1985b) and Nilsson (2002) as one of the most striking difficulties in carrying out this type of research. Therefore, the case study was deliberately chosen considering both the possibility of access to the companies' information and the managerial model of the group, which in this case promotes acquisitions as a means of growth, expansion of portfolio, and increase in the scope of operations geographically.
Tax strategy control: The case of transfer pricing tax risk management
2013, Management Accounting ResearchCitation Excerpt :Contingency theory is based on the premise that there is no universally appropriate accounting or control system that fits all organisations in all circumstances (Otley, 1980; see Chenhall, 2003, for a review). Instead, according to contingency theorists, accounting and control systems are continuously adjusted to fit the contextual changes that occur in the organisation and its environment (Jones, 1985). The contingency approach thus implies that transfer pricing practices differ between organisations depending on the contextual circumstances.
Overhead cost allocation changes in a transfer pricing tax compliant multinational enterprise
2010, Management Accounting ResearchCitation Excerpt :As stressed by Otley (1980), “the contingency approach to management accounting is based on the premise that there is no universally appropriate accounting system which applies equally to all organizations in all circumstances”. Similarly, Jones (1985) states that an organization needs to ensure that specific systems meet organizational goals and motives while being continuously adjusted according to the dynamic changes that take place in organizational and environmental factors. Contingency theory thus implies that different environments require different management practices (McAulay and Tomkins, 1992; Schweikart, 1985).