Research paperSurface geochemical methods used for oil and gas prospecting — a review
References (149)
- et al.
The occurrence and distribution of methane in the marine environment
Deep-Sea Res.
(1967) - et al.
Natural gas seepage in the Gulf of Mexico
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(1976) - et al.
Geochemical prospecting — a review of its status and future
Earth-Sci. Rev.
(1970) - et al.
Soil hydrocarbon geochemistry, a potential petroleum exploration tool in the Cooper Basin, Australia
J. Geochem. Explor.
(1977) The use of helium in mineral exploration
J. Geochem. Explor.
(1976)Organic substances in potable water and its precursor. Part I: Methods for their determination by gas-liquid chromatography
J. Chromatogr.
(1973)- et al.
Organic substances in potable water and its precursor. Part II: Applications to the area of Zurich
J. Chromatogr.
(1974) - et al.
Organic substances in potable water and its precursor. Part III: The closed loop stripping procedure compared with rapid liquid extraction
J. Chromatogr.
(1975) Determination of dissolved hydrocarbons in subsurface brines
Chem. Geol.
(1969)Searchers “sniffing” for North Sea gas
Oil Gas J.
(1964)
Hydrogeochemical survey in the Archangel region of the Bashir
SSSR. Tr. Geol. Inst., Akad. Nauk SSSR
A geochemical model for characterization of hydrocarbon gas sources in marine sediments
Geochemical prospecting for oil and gas by remote laser spectrometry of methane in air at ground level
Int. Geol. Rev.
The ammonium ion as an indicator of oil and gas
Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR
Geochemical exploration methods
Method of geochemical prospecting
The role of microorganisms in petroleum exploration
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
The utilization of methane, ethane and propane by soil micro-organisms
J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.
Growth of Mycobacterium paraffinicum on low concentrations of hydrocarbons
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
Sources, sinks and concentrations of light hydrocarbons in the Gulf of Mexico
J. Geophys. Res.
Baseline concentrations of light hydrocarbons in the Gulf of Mexico
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Molecular and isotopic composition of two seep gases from the Gulf of Mexico
Geophys. Res. Lett.
Distribution of light hydrocarbons in seafloor sediment: correlations between geochemistry, seismic structure and possible reservoired oil and gas
Gaseous survey methods in exploration and prospecting for oil and gas: a review
Alberta Soc. Pet. Geol. J.
Gas analysis in sediment samples from Legs 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19
Submarine seepage of natural gas in Norton Sound, Alaska
Science
Isotopic identification of leakage gas from underground storage reservoirs — a progress report
Ill. Pet.
Biogeochemical evidence for subsurface hydrocarbon occurrence, Recluse Oil Field, Wyoming: preliminary results
U.S. Geol. Surv. Circ.
Petroleum Microbiology
Detection of microbially produced gaseous hydrocarbons other than methane
Science
Field and laboratory methods used by the Geological Survey of Canada in geochemical surveys. No. 6. Determination of hydrocarbons in soils by gas chromatography
Geol. Surv. Can., Pap., 64-15
Geochemical prospecting for petroleum and natural gas in Canada
Geol. Surv. Can., Bull.
Future position of petroleum geology in the oil industry
Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol.
An experiment in soil geochemical prospecting for petroleum, Della Gas Field, Cooper Basin
APEA J.
Petroleum microseepage at Cement, Oklahoma: evidence and mechanism
Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol.
Late diagenetic indicators of buried oil and gas
U.S. Geol. Surv., Open-File Rep., 77-817
Recognition of petroleum-bearing traps by unusual isotopic compositions of carbonate-cemented surface rocks
Geology
A possible petroleum-related geochemical anomaly in surface rocks, Boulder and Weld Counties, Colorado
U.S. Geol. Surv., Open-File Rep., 75-47
Late diagenetic indicators of buried oil and gas: II. Direct detection experiment at Cement and Garza oil fields, Oklahoma and Texas, using enhanced LANDSAT I and II images
U.S. Geol. Surv., Open-File Rep., 79-243
Aeromagnetic detection of diagenetic magnetite over oil fields
Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol.
Marine seep detection
Offshore
Marine seep detection — a new reconnaissance method
Geophysics
Radon-222 emanations from a uranium deposit
Econ. Geol.
Field and laboratory methods used by the geological survey of Canada in geochemical surveys. No. 10 — Radon determination apparatus for geochemical prospecting for uranium
Geol. Surv. Can., Pap., 68-21
Development of uranium exploration methods using radon
Geol. Surv. Can., Pap., 69-46
The use of radon-222 in surface waters in geochemical prospecting for uranium
Colo. Sch. Mines, Mag.
Gases in marine sediments
Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol.
Methane, ethane and propane concentrations in the Gulf of Mexico
Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol.
Theoretical analysis of regional groundwater flow, Part 1
Theoretical analysis of regional groundwater flow, Part 2
Water Res.
Cited by (56)
Marine seepage variability and its impact on evaluating the surface migrated hydrocarbon seep signal
2020, Marine and Petroleum GeologyCitation Excerpt :The detection of chemically identifiable seeps, also known as surface geochemistry, has been a petroleum industry evaluation tool since the early days of exploration: Laubmeyer (1933); Sokolov (1935); Link (1952); Kartsev et al. (1959); Stegena (1961); Hitchon (1974); Coleman et al. (1977); Philp and Crisp (1982); Jones and Drozd (1983); Horvitz (1969), 1981, and 1985; Brooks and Carey (1986); Clarke and Cleverly (1991); Glotov (1992); Klusman (1993); Schumacher and Abrams, 1996; Schumacher and LeSchack (2002); Kvenvolden and Cooper (2003); O'Brien et al., 2003; Abrams (2005); Huang et al., 2009; and Abrams and Dahdah (2011).
Origin of near-surface hydrocarbon gases bound in northern Barents Sea sediments
2019, Marine and Petroleum GeologyCitation Excerpt :The compositional and stable isotope signature of thermogenic hydrocarbon gas can be altered through secondary processes including oxidation of methane, which increases gas wetness and δ13C CH4 (Abrams, 2017; Barker and Fritz, 1981; Coleman et al., 1981; Whiticar and Faber, 1986; Orphan et al., 2001; Kniemeyer et al., 2007), microbial degradation of higher hydrocarbons, which decreases gas wetness and increases δ13C of C2+ (Jaekel et al., 2013; Musat, 2015) or mixing with microbial gas (Fukuda et al., 1984a,b; Whiticar et al., 1986; Balabane et al., 1987; Hinrichs et al., 2006) or thermogenic gas generated from different kerogen precursors or generated at different levels of thermal maturity (Stahl, 1977; Chung and Sackett, 1980; Schoell, 1980; Berner and Faber, 1988; Berner et al., 1995). Bound gas surveys have been frequently applied in regional onshore and offshore studies (Bjorøy and Løberg, 1993; Blumenberg et al., 2016; Cramer and Franke, 2005; Faber et al., 1990, 1997; Faber and Stahl, 1983, 1984; Horvitz, 1972, 1985; Knies et al., 2004; Mani et al., 2011, 2012; Patil et al., 2013; Philp and Crisp, 1982; Rao et al., 2013). Most of these studies use the stable isotope and molecular composition of bound gas to differentiate between (migrated) thermogenic gas and microbial gas, based on interpretation schemes derived from natural gas reservoirs (Schoell, 1980) and interstitial and seep gas (Bernard et al., 1976).
Hydrocarbon micro-seepage detection from airborne hyper-spectral images by plant stress spectra based on the PROSPECT model
2019, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationGround-based hyperspectral remote sensing of hydrocarbon-induced rock alterations at cement, Oklahoma
2016, Marine and Petroleum GeologyRegional hydraulic behavior of structural zones and sedimentological heterogeneities in an overpressured sedimentary basin
2013, Marine and Petroleum GeologyCitation Excerpt :These areas would, therefore, be hydraulically favorable targets for near-surface geochemical hydrocarbon exploration. [ Principles of and examples for this exploration method, called “near-surface geochemical exploration”, can be found in e.g., Laubmeyer (1933); Philp and Crisp (1982); Schumacher (2000); Tóth (1996)]. The spatially uniform and ubiquitous upward flow can be observed generally down from the top of the Algyő Aquitard, i.e. within the z = (−1200) − (2000) m asl elevation interval.
Formation and Geochemistry of Oil and Gas
2013, Treatise on Geochemistry: Second Edition