Theory and methodology
A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System

https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00041-AGet rights and content

Abstract

This research addresses the problem of selecting the most appropriate Flexible Manufacturing System (FMS) for a manufacturing organization. A unified framework is proposed to facilitate decision making in the design and planning stage. The recommended framework contains three individual modules: an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a simulation module, and an accounting procedure. These modules are unified through an efficiency measurement method called Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The AHP model examines the nonmonetary criteria associated with corporate goals and long-term objectives, while the simulation model is employed to analyze the tangible benefits. Both AHP and simulation models are used to generate the necessary outputs for the DEA, whereas the accounting procedure determines the required inputs, such as expenditures and resources, for realizing the potential benefits. After solving an original DEA, a modification of the DEA structure is found to be imperative, because inappropriate multipliers (weights) are assigned by the conventional use of DEA and multiple efficient Decision Making Units (DMUs) are identified in the DEA solution. By applying weight flexibility restriction and cross efficiency methods to rectify the difficulty, this study finally identifies the most efficient FMS system.

References (44)

  • A. Arbel et al.

    Performance evaluation of Flexible Manufacturing Systems

    IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics

    (1984)
  • K.R. Baker

    Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling

    (1974)
  • R.D. Banker et al.

    Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis

    Management Science

    (1984)
  • R. Bonetto

    Flexible Manufacturing Systems in Practice

    (1988)
  • J.A. Buzacott et al.

    Flexible Manufacturing Systems: A review of analytical models

    Management Science

    (1986)
  • J. Chandra et al.

    Economic justification of Flexible Manufacturing Systems using the Leontief input-output Model

    The Engineering Economist

    (1988)
  • A. Charnes et al.

    Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming

    (1961)
  • A. Charnes et al.

    Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA

    Annals of Operations Research

    (1985)
  • A. Charnes et al.

    A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiencies and inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis

    Journal of Productivity Analysis

    (1991)
  • A. Charnes et al.

    Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming

    International Journal of System Science

    (1989)
  • Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
  • W.W. Cooper et al.

    Data Envelopment Analysis: Survey and interpretations

    Communications of the Operations Research Society of Japan

    (1994)
    W.W. Cooper et al.

    Data Envelopment Analysis: Survey and interpretations

    Communications of the Operations Research Society of Japan

    (1994)
    W.W. Cooper et al.

    Data Envelopment Analysis: Survey and interpretations

    Communications of the Operations Research Society of Japan

    (1994)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text