Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00131-UGet rights and content

Abstract

This paper examines three essential components which comprise efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis. The three components are present in each DEA model and determine the implicit evaluation scheme associated with the model. These components provide a framework for classifying the various DEA models with respect to (i) the form of envelopment surface, (ii) the orientation, and (iii) the pricing mechanism implicit in the multiplier lower bounds. The discussion focuses on the standard DEA models, includes additional issues relating to efficiency evaluation, and is illustrated by a computational example.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (92)

  • Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on the efficiency of Portuguese state-owned enterprise hospitals

    2022, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Finally, since the studies reviewed so far revealed that Portugal was unable to use its resources efficiently [2,28], we wanted to further understand which factors might help explain these findings, particularly considering the stringent resource allocation faced by Portuguese hospitals during the pandemic. The VBDEA model has been developed by [31] and tackles both the scaling bias and the absence of interpretation of the scores obtained through the weighted additive model [32]. This is accomplished by coupling into a single framework the DEA and MCDA approaches embedding the DMs’ preferences, also translating the input and output values into value scales.

  • Evaluating the efficiency of structural funds: An application in the competitiveness of SMEs across different EU beneficiary regions

    2021, Omega (United Kingdom)
    Citation Excerpt :

    The Value-Based DEA model suggested in Gouveia et al. [32] also overcomes the problem of the scales, since all the inputs and outputs are converted into values. The Value-Based DEA is different from the weighted additive model [1] since it enables incorporating value judgments, using concepts from multiattribute utility theory (MAUT). According to the Value-Based DEA, the DMUs are viewed as alternatives of a multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) model, where the criteria are the input/output factors, considering that “the inputs are usually the “less-the-better” type of performance measures and the outputs are usually the “more-the-better” type of performance measures” [19], whereas their transformation process is not important.

  • Benchmarking of maintenance and outage repair in an electricity distribution company using the value-based DEA method

    2015, Omega (United Kingdom)
    Citation Excerpt :

    The present study combines DEA with multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) including relevant preferential information elicited from the DM using value-based DEA [26,27]. This method is based on the additive DEA model with oriented projections [28], making use of concepts developed in the field of MCDA under imprecise information [29,30]. The present paper presents a benchmarking study for one of the activities performed by EDP Distribuição (EDP-D)—maintenance and outage repair.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text