The effects of electronic performance monitoring on stress: Locus of control as a moderator variable

https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(96)00016-7Get rights and content

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a substantial increase in the number of companies using electronic performance monitoring (EPM) systems to evaluate their employees. Data from several case studies suggest that employees who are monitored using EPM experience more stress than employees who are monitored by other means. However, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions from this research, because organizations tend to introduce other programs at the same time as EPM systems are installed. Additionally, little existing research examines the role that employee characteristics play in determinigg EPM's impact. The current study represents an attempt to address these issues. Laboratory subjects worked on two relatively simple computerized tasks and were told either that their work would be monitored via a supervisory computer networked to their terminal, or that their work would not be observed. All other work climate variables were held constant. After completing the tasks, subjects' locus of control and perceived stress were measured. Locus of control was found to moderate the relationship between EPM and stress. Internals felt more stress when their work was electronically monitored. In contrast, externals felt more stress when their work was not monitored. These findings are interpreted using a person-environment fit framework.

References (35)

  • J. Cahill et al.

    Electronic monitoring: Analysis of current practices and implications for occupational stress

  • A. Chomiak et al.

    The effects of computer monitoring and distraction on task performance

  • J. Cohen et al.

    Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1975)
  • K.M. Davidson et al.

    Effects of ‘status sets’ on Rotter's locus of control scale

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1978)
  • M.J. Diamond et al.

    Changes in locus of control as a function of encounter group experiences

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1973)
  • S. Folkman

    Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1984)
  • G.R. Gemmill et al.

    Fatalism as a factor in managerial job satisfaction, job strain and mobility

    Personnel Psychology

    (1972)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Humans judge, algorithms nudge: The psychology of behavior tracking acceptance

      2021, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Research on monitoring reiterates the autonomy-infringing effects of tracking (Bernstein, 2012; Ranganathan & Benson, 2020). Taken together, when subjected to human-based tracking, people experience pressure to avoid negative judgment (George & Zhou, 2001; Zhou, 2003); this makes them feel controlled and, ultimately, less autonomous (Kolb & Aiello, 1996). Importantly, by removing the humans who are capable of making negative judgments about those being tracked, technology-operated tracking enables people to obtain information about their behaviors without worrying about being judged.

    • Group satisfaction with group work under surveillance: The stimulus-organism-response (SOR) perspective

      2021, Telematics and Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Surveillance reduces the number of social exchanges, deteriorates social relationships, (Lam and Lau, 2012), and ultimately leads to negative atmospheres by intensifying individuals’ stress (Stanton and Julian, 2002). Many studies demonstrate a significant relationship between surveillance and stress (Kolb and Aiello, 1996). For example, traffic to privacy-sensitive articles on Wikipedia significantly decreased after Snowden’s leaks, as people recognized the US government’s covert online surveillance (Penney, 2016).

    • Electronic Performance Monitoring and sustained attention: Social facilitation for modern applications

      2019, Computers in Human Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      While previous research has demonstrated that intermittent monitoring produces effects similar to those of continuous monitoring (i.e., Bergum & Lehr, 1963, Brewer, 1995; Griffith, 1993; Reither et al., 2012), the effects of the temporal properties of evaluation have not been examined, especially as an individual differences variable. Additionally, it is also possible that the temporal properties of the evaluation interacted with other known individual differences factors, such as extraversion or intrinsic motivation (Kolb & Aiello, 1996; Uziel, 2006), to produce a moderating effect on social presence. Perhaps individuals higher in extraversion, for example, may be more concerned with a present-based evaluation, whereas individuals with higher self-esteem, are affected more by a future-based evaluation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text