Identification of linearised joint structural parameters by combined use of measured and computed frequency responses

https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-3270(91)90028-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The necessity of accurate prediction of structural dynamics has led to extensive studies on identification of joint structural parameters. The present paper proposes an effective identification scheme for linearised joint parameters of a structure, which makes use of not only the measured frequency response functions (FRFs) of the structure but also the computed FRFs of an auxiliary model. The auxiliary model is constructed such that it possesses the same properties as the test structure except the joint structural parameters to be determined. The fundamental assumption is that the dynamic properties of the structure other than the joint parameters to be identified are completely known. The proposed identification scheme is straighforward and cost-effective, requiring neither modal parameters nor any condensation techniques for the model.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (42)

  • Nonlinear vibration mechanism and modeling for flange-bolted joints

    2024, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
  • Linear contact interface parameter identification using dynamic characteristic equation

    2016, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
    Citation Excerpt :

    The advantages of FRF based approaches over modal based approaches in joint parameter identification were discussed by Nobari [18]. Hong and Lee [19] proposed a hybrid method which employs the experimentally measured and numerically simulated FRFs and identifies the structural joint parameters. Hwang [20] identified the joint parameters by employing the FRFs of a structure with joint and the FRFs of a structure without joint.

  • FRF based joint dynamics modeling and identification

    2013, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
    Citation Excerpt :

    The CMS method is therefore more applicable for the finite element (FE) environment but it may be difficult to use for the experimental data. As a result of these limitations, another methodology (i.e. response-based methods) is introduced, which directly deals with the frequency response properties of the structure and does not require the extraction of modal data [6]. The receptance coupling (RC) method, which is a response-based method, couples substructures using experimentally or analytically obtained frequency response functions (FRFs) [7].

  • Identification of dynamic stiffness matrices of elastomeric joints using direct and inverse methods

    2013, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
    Citation Excerpt :

    Joints such as fasteners, welds, bearings, and elastomers present many challenges in modeling, and thus, the development of identification methods has drawn much attention [1–11].

  • Identifying joints from measured reflection coefficients in beam-like structures with application to a pipe support

    2010, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
    Citation Excerpt :

    Some techniques arrive at a frequency domain description of the joint without making any a priori assumptions about the physical form of the joint [1,2]. Other techniques presuppose a parametric joint model (e.g. masses, springs and dampers) and tune the parameter values so as to best match experimental data [3–5]. In the case of FE models, modal or frequency response data are frequently used as they are often readily measurable [6].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text