A comprehensive mitigation assessment process (COMAP) for the evaluation of forestry mitigation options

https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(95)00027-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Carbon emissions from land-use change in the tropics contribute significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions. The evaluation of carbon flows from land-use change and the associated socioeconomic impacts are just beginning for the tropical countries. This paper presents a comprehensive mitigation assessment process (COMAP) for the evaluation of forest sector mitigation options. COMAP is a bottom-up methodological framework which was used in the assessment of carbon sequestration potential by the F7 countries and is recommended in the IPCC 1995 Working Group II chapter. COMAP helps to account for carbon and monetary flows, and to develop scenarios and cost-effectiveness indicators of alternative mitigation options. The COMAP calculation method is coded in a spreadsheet format.

References (43)

  • J.N. Swisher

    Cost and performance of CO2 storage in forestry projects

    Biomass and Bioenergy

    (1991)
  • K. Richards et al.

    Costs of creating carbon sinks in the US

    Energy Convers. Mgmt

    (1993)
  • IPCC

    Section A: Greenhouse Gases

  • R.K. Dixon et al.

    Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems

    Science

    (14 January 1994)
  • W. Makundi et al.
  • R. Houghton

    Emissions of greenhouse gases

  • World Resources Institute (WRI)

    World Resources 1990–1991

    (1990)
  • K. Andrasko et al.

    Estimating the costs of forest sector management options: overview of site, national and global analyses

  • R. Dixon et al.

    Assessment of Promising Forest Management Practices and Technologies for Enhancing the Conservation and Sequestration of Atmospheric Carbon and Their Costs at the Site Level

    US EPA/600/3-91/067

    (October 1991)
  • R. Sedjo et al.

    Climate and forests

  • A. Grainger

    Estimating areas of degraded tropical lands requiring replenishment of forest cover

    Int. Tree Crops J.

    (1988)
  • N. Myers

    Deforestation Rates in Tropical Forests and Their Climatic Implications

    (1989)
  • M. Trexler et al.

    Forestry as a Response to Global Warming: an Analysis of the Guatemala Agroforestry and Carbon Sequestration Project

    (1989)
  • J.K. Winjum et al.

    Forest management and the economics of carbon storage: the nonfinancial component

    Climate Research

    (1993)
  • R. Adams et al.

    Sequestering carbon on agricultural land: social cost and impacts on timber markets

    Contemporary Policy Issues

    (January 1993)
  • G.K. Kadekodi et al.

    Economic and policy analysis of role of forestry as a climate mitigation option for India

    LBL Draft Report

    (1994)
  • S. Brown et al.

    Management of Forests for Mitigation of Climate Change

  • M. Gillis et al.

    Deforestation and Government Policy

  • D. Hall et al.

    Cooling the greenhouse with bioenergy

    Nature

    (1991)
  • R.K. Dixon et al.

    Integrated land-use systems: assessment of promising agroforestry and alternative land-use practices to enhance carbon conservation and sequestration

  • C. Sargent et al.

    Options for the coordination of international action on forest conservation and management

  • Cited by (25)

    • Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints

      2009, Energy Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In evaluating land scarcity, consideration needs to be given to (1) whether abandoned agriculture land becomes available; (2) whether degraded lands can be used for bio-energy production and (3) whether natural areas can be used (da Costa, 2004). Proponents of bio-energy often point to the opportunity to use degraded areas for bio-energy production which would (1) not lead to competition with crop production; (2) not lead to biodiversity loss and (3) could help improving soil quality (Read et al., 2002; Sathaye et al., 1995). As such the relationship between land degradation and bio-energy potential is very important.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text