A comprehensive mitigation assessment process (COMAP) for the evaluation of forestry mitigation options
References (43)
Cost and performance of CO2 storage in forestry projects
Biomass and Bioenergy
(1991)- et al.
Costs of creating carbon sinks in the US
Energy Convers. Mgmt
(1993) Section A: Greenhouse Gases
- et al.
Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems
Science
(14 January 1994) - et al.
Emissions of greenhouse gases
World Resources 1990–1991
(1990)- et al.
Estimating the costs of forest sector management options: overview of site, national and global analyses
- et al.
Assessment of Promising Forest Management Practices and Technologies for Enhancing the Conservation and Sequestration of Atmospheric Carbon and Their Costs at the Site Level
US EPA/600/3-91/067
(October 1991) - et al.
Climate and forests
Estimating areas of degraded tropical lands requiring replenishment of forest cover
Int. Tree Crops J.
(1988)
Deforestation Rates in Tropical Forests and Their Climatic Implications
(1989)
Forestry as a Response to Global Warming: an Analysis of the Guatemala Agroforestry and Carbon Sequestration Project
(1989)
Forest management and the economics of carbon storage: the nonfinancial component
Climate Research
(1993)
Sequestering carbon on agricultural land: social cost and impacts on timber markets
Contemporary Policy Issues
(January 1993)
Economic and policy analysis of role of forestry as a climate mitigation option for India
LBL Draft Report
(1994)
Management of Forests for Mitigation of Climate Change
Deforestation and Government Policy
Cooling the greenhouse with bioenergy
Nature
(1991)
Integrated land-use systems: assessment of promising agroforestry and alternative land-use practices to enhance carbon conservation and sequestration
Options for the coordination of international action on forest conservation and management
Cited by (25)
Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints
2009, Energy PolicyCitation Excerpt :In evaluating land scarcity, consideration needs to be given to (1) whether abandoned agriculture land becomes available; (2) whether degraded lands can be used for bio-energy production and (3) whether natural areas can be used (da Costa, 2004). Proponents of bio-energy often point to the opportunity to use degraded areas for bio-energy production which would (1) not lead to competition with crop production; (2) not lead to biodiversity loss and (3) could help improving soil quality (Read et al., 2002; Sathaye et al., 1995). As such the relationship between land degradation and bio-energy potential is very important.
The potential contribution of sinks to meeting Kyoto Protocol commitments
2001, Environmental Science and PolicyThe Re-parametrization of the DAS Model Based on 2016-2021 Data of the National Forestry Database: New Results on Cutting Age Distributions
2023, Acta Silvatica et Lignaria HungaricaImpact of sludge deposition on biodiversity
2015, EcotoxicologyCarbon Sequestration and Economic Potential of the Selected Medicinal Tree Species: Evidence From Sikkim, India
2014, Journal of Sustainable Forestry
Copyright © 1995 Published by Elsevier Ltd.