Biomass combustion for power generation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(96)00033-5Get rights and content

Abstract

An overview is given of the state of the art of biomass combustion power generation technologies with a capacity of more than 10 MWe. Biomass combustion technologies have been compared on a qualitative basis and a selection of individual biomass combustion power plants has been compared on a quantitative basis. Collected data were modified for comparison of the various power plants in the quantitative analysis.

The qualitative analysis focused on the following technologies: pile, grate, suspension and fluidised-bed combustion. Fluidised-bed systems are found to have relatively high efficiencies and are also flexible with regard to fuel properties. Both fluidised-bed systems and vibrating grates are successful in limiting thermal NOx formation.

Some recently built plants and some planned concepts are compared quantitatively on the basis of efficiency, investment costs and emissions. All electric efficiencies are close to or above 30% (at lower heating value). Of the plants fired solely by biomass, vibrating grates and circulating fluidised beds turn out to have the highest efficiency at the moment. Co-firing of 4.5% biomass in a pulverised coal boiler has an efficiency of about 37% (LHV). Expected efficiencies for large-scale (100 to 250 MWe) promising concepts are in the 39–44% (LHV) range. Investment costs range from 1200 to 2900 (1992)US$/kWe. High costs are often caused by additional features such as the firing of difficult fuels or combined heat and power production.

None of the existing technologies is found to be superior with respect to all the criteria selected.

References (42)

  • J.H. Turnbull

    Use of biomass in electric power generation: the California experience

    Biomass and Bioenergy

    (1993)
  • U.S. Department of Energy

    Electricity from Biomass: a Development Strategy

    (1992)
  • R. Hollenbacher

    Biomass combustion technologies in the United States

  • P. Elliot et al.

    Brazilian biomass power demonstration project

    (1993)
  • A. Faaij et al.

    Gasification of biomass wastes and residues for electricity production

  • S. Consonni et al.

    Biomass-gasifier/aeroderivative gas turbine combined cycles. Part B: Performance calculations and economic assessment

  • R. van den Broek et al.

    Biomass combustion power generation technologies

  • G. Peppink

    Horticulture heating in Aalsmeer: efficiency and capacity of a combined cycle unit with supply of heat and with steam-injection in the gas turbine at an outside temperature of 5°C [in Dutch]

    (1985)
  • OECD
  • B. Schwieger

    Power from wood

    Power

    (1980)
  • G.A. Wiltsee et al.

    Biomass combustion technologies for power generation

  • K. Toupin

    Modern wood fired boiler designs: history, and technology changes, Paper presented [not in Proceedings] at

  • R. Christiansen

    Combustion of bio-fuels for the production of heat & power

    (1992)
  • E.S. Piscitello et al.

    Biomass cofiring analysis summary

    (1992)
  • C.R. McGowin et al.

    Potential benefits of co-firing wood and coal

  • R.J. Dry et al.

    Combustion in fluidized beds

    Chemical Engineering Progress

    (1990)
  • J.L. Hanson

    Fluidized-bed combustion of biomass

  • R.D. La Nauze

    A review of fluidized bed combustion of biomass

    Journal of the Institute of Energy

    (1987)
  • Marshall, D.K., Personal communication. Zurn/NEPCO, Redmond, WA,...
  • J.M. Irving

    Joseph C. McNeil generating station: heat rate performance

    (1986)
  • J.M. Irving

    Wood fired power plant experience at the 50 MW McNeil station

  • Cited by (168)

    • Phase development and mechanical response of low-level cement replacements with wood ash and washed wood ash

      2021, Construction and Building Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      According to a recently published report by representatives from Austria, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands [4] grate combustion is predominately used for combustion of biomass, but circulating fluidised bed combustion is gaining ground in many of the countries. These types of plants, grate or circulating fluidised bed combustion, have the highest efficiency when solely biomass is used [17], and are the most common type of plants regarding combustion of biomass. This means that the two chosen WAs represent common types of WAs.

    • Biomass gasification: Thermochemical route to energetic bio-chemicals

      2021, Advanced Biofuel Technologies: Present Status, Challenges and Future Prospects
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text