Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 3, Issue 4, December 1995, Pages 193-214
Gait & Posture

Review article
Human balance and posture control during standing and walking

https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6362(96)82849-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The common denominator in the assessment of human balance and posture is the inverted pendulum model. If we focus on appropriate versions of the model we can use it to identify the gravitational and acceleration perturbations and pinpoint the motor mechanisms that can defend against any perturbation.

We saw that in quiet standing an ankle strategy applies only in the AP direction and that a separate hip load/unload strategy by the hip abd/adductors is the totally dominant defence in the ML direction when standing with feet side by side. In other standing positions (tandem, or intermediate) the two mechanisms still work separately, but their roles reverse. In the tandem position ML balance is an ankle mechanism (invertors/evertors) while in the AP direction a hip load/unloading mechanism dominates.

During initiation and termination of gait these two separate mechanisms control the trajectory of the COP to ensure the desired acceleration and deceleration of the COM. During initiation the initial acceleration of the COM forward towards the stance limb is achieved by a posterior and lateral movement of the COP towards the swing limb. After this release phase there is a sudden loading of the stance limb which shifts the COP to the stance limb. The COM is now accelerated forward and laterally towards the future position of the swinging foot. Also ML shifts of the COP were controlled by the hip abductors/adductors and all AP shifts were under the control of the ankle plantar/dorsiflexors. During termination the trajectory of both COM and COP reverse. As the final weight-bearing on the stance foot takes place the COM is passing forward along the medial border of that foot. Hyperactivity of that foot's plantarflexors takes the COP forward and when the final foot begins to bear weight the COP moves rapidly across and suddenly stops at a position ahead of the future position of the COM. Then the plantarflexors of both feet release and allow the COP to move posteriorly and approach the COM and meet it as quiet stance is achieved. The inverted pendulum model permitted us to understand the separate roles of the two mechanisms during these critical unbalancing and rebalancing periods.

During walking the inverted pendulum model explained the dynamics of the balance of HAT in both the AP and ML directions. Here the model includes the couple due to the acceleration of the weight-bearing hip as well as gravitational perturbations. The exclusive control of AP balance and posture are the hip extensors and flexors, while in the ML direction the dominant control is with the hip abductors with very minor adductor involvement. At the ankle the inverted pendulum model sees the COM passing forward along the medial border to the weight-bearing foot. The model predicts that during single support the body is falling forward and being accelerated medially towards the future position of the swing foot. The model predicts an insignificant role of the ankle invertors/evertors in the ML control. Rather, the future position of the swing foot is the critical variable or more specifically the lateral displacement from the COM at the start of single support. The position is actually under the control of the hip abd/adductors during the previous early swing phase.

The critical importance of the hip abductors/adductors in balance during all phases of standing and walking is now evident. This separate mechanism is important from a neural control perspective and clinically it focuses major attention on therapy and potential problems with some surgical procedures. On the other hand the minuscule role of the ankle invertors/evertors is important to note. Except for the tandem standing position these muscles have negligible involvement in balance control.

References (71)

  • WE McIlroy et al.

    Task constraints on foot movement and incidence of compensatory stepping following perturbation to upright stance

    Brain Res

    (1993)
  • DA Winter

    Overall principle of lower limb-support during stance phase of gait

    J Biomech

    (1980)
  • DA Winter

    Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: variability and compensating effects

    Hum Move Sci

    (1984)
  • S Bouisset et al.

    Biomechanical study of the programming of anticipatory postural adjustments associated with arm movement

    J Biomech

    (1987)
  • Y Brenière et al.

    When and how does steady state gait movement induced from upright stance begin?

    J Biomech

    (1986)
  • RL Waters et al.

    Translational motion of the head and trunk during normal walking

    J Biomech

    (1973)
  • A Cappozzo

    Analysis of the linear displacement of the head and trunk during different walking speeds

    J Biomech

    (1981)
  • F Prince et al.

    Anticipatory control of upper body balance during human locomotion

    Gait Posture

    (1994)
  • NN Byl

    Spatial orientation to gravity and implications for balance training

    Orthop Phys Therap Clin North Am

    (1992)
  • MJ Ashley et al.

    A longitudinal study of falls in an elderly population. II. Some circumstances of falling

    Age Ageing

    (1977)
  • A Gabell et al.

    Falls in the healthy elderly: predisposing causes

    Ergonomics

    (1985)
  • PW Overstall et al.

    Falls in the elderly related to postural imbalance

    Br Med J

    (1977)
  • D Prudham et al.

    Factors associated with falls in the elderly: a community study

    Age Ageing

    (1981)
  • J Okubo et al.

    Influence of foot position and visual field condition in the examination of equilibrium function and sway of centre of gravity in normal persons

    Agressologie

    (1979)
  • TDW Roberts et al.

    The nature of postural sway

    Agressologie

    (1976)
  • AJ Spaepen et al.

    Comparison of the movements of the centre of gravity and centre of pressure in stabilometric studies

    Agressologie

    (1977)
  • DA Winter et al.

    Mediallateral and anterior-posterior motor responses associated with centre of pressure changes in quiet standing

    Neurosci Res Commun

    (1993)
  • FB Horak et al.

    Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support surface configurations

    J Neurophysiol

    (1986)
  • AJ Spaepen et al.

    Centre of gravity and centre of pressure in stabilometric studies

    Agressologie

    (1979)
  • MP Murray et al.

    Centre of gravity, centre of pressure and supportive forces during human activities

    J Appl Physiol

    (1967)
  • JB Geursen et al.

    A model of standing man for the description of his dynamic behaviour

    Agressologie

    (1976)
  • TS Kapteyn et al.

    Standardization in platform stabilometry being a part of posturography

    Agressologie

    (1983)
  • TE Prieto et al.

    Characterization and modelling the postural steadiness in the elderly: a review

    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng

    (1993)
  • SD Lucy et al.

    Postural sway profiles, normal subjects and subjects with cerebellar ataxia

    Physiol Can

    (1985)
  • JJ Collins et al.

    Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis centre-of-pressure trajectories

    Exp Brain Res

    (1993)
  • Cited by (2284)

    • Designing a heuristic computing structure to solve the human balancing model

      2024, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text