Sociable and aggressive dominance: Personality differences in leadership style?
References (69)
The analysis of movement behavior during the clinical interview
- et al.
Person and situation views of leadership: A multiple levels of analysis approach
Leadership Quarterly
(1991) Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach
(1979)Social interaction
(1969)- et al.
Dispositional and situational influences on dominance behavior in small groups
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1983) The equilibrium problem in small groups
Stogdill's handbook of leadership
(1981)Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications
(1990)- et al.
Reactions to intergroup competition under win-lose conditions
Management Science
(1961) - et al.
Comparison of strategies in developing scales for dominance
Psychological Bulletin
(1968)
Differential correlates of dominance scales
Journal of Personality
The sixteen personality factors questionnaire
Studies in Machiavellism
A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Sociale ondersteuning, spanning en stemming
The organization of agonistic relations within two captive groups of Java-monkeys
Zeitschrift fuer Tierpsychologie
Edwards personality preference schedule
Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and issues
Traits are alive and well
Multidimensional scaling of power strategies
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Leadership and supervision in industry: An evaluation of a supervisory training program
Stressful situations
Manual for the California psychological inventory
A personality scale of dominance
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Conceptuele Systemen: Een onderzoek naar de betekenis van de dimensie concreet-abstract in cognitieve processen
Modern factor analysis
Non-verbal communication: The state of the art
Motivation und handeln (Motivation and action)
Short forms of the Texas social behavior inventory (TSBI), an objective measure of self-esteem
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication
Leadership and power
The Jackson personality inventory
Development of an objective psychological test for the determination for the coronary prone behavior pattern in employed man
Journal of Chronic Disease
The “big five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires
Cited by (63)
Interdependence approaches to the person and the situation
2021, Measuring and Modeling Persons and SituationsIn the eye of a leader: Eye-directed gazing shapes perceptions of leaders' charisma
2019, Leadership QuarterlyCitation Excerpt :To replicate our initial findings, we employed the same design as study 1. In contrast to study 1, however participants filled in self-rating questionnaires measuring charismatic leadership (Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire 5X-Short, Avolio & Bass, 2004; Conger-Kanungo scale, Conger, Kanungo, Menon, & Mathur, 1997), leader motivation (Motivation to Lead, affective identity, Chan & Drasgow, 2001), dominance (Kalma, Visser, & Peeters, 1993) and leader prototypicality (Antonakis et al., 2011). Furthermore, we collected audio-visual recordings of all participants' motivational speeches.
Tracking the Leader: Gaze Behavior in Group Interactions
2019, iSciencePubertal development, social factors, and delinquent involvement among South Korean male adolescents
2017, International Journal of Law, Crime and JusticeCitation Excerpt :Self-esteem was measured by summing the responses to six items from the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965) (alpha = 0.77). Both forms of dominance were measured by drawing on Kalma and associates' scales (see Kalma et al., 1993). For aggressive dominance, four items that appear to tap the construct effectively were chosen from the original 10-item scale.
High intrasexual competition is related to inflated height reports in male junior soccer players
2017, Personality and Individual DifferencesCitation Excerpt :Participants also completed two scales which assessed sociable and aggressive dominance, consisting of 8 items for the sociable dominance scale, and 7 items for the aggressive dominance scale. Both original scales are reliable—with Cronbach's alphas of 0.79 and 0.68, respectively—and have been validated using observational data in social interactions (Kalma et al., 1993). Spanish versions of the scales (Mailhos, Buunk, & del Arca, 2013) were used in the current study.
Signature size signals sociable dominance and narcissism
2016, Journal of Research in PersonalityCitation Excerpt :Moreover, these results are not dependent on which of the three operationalizations of signature size is used (see Supplementary Tables S3 and S4). According to Kalma et al. (1993) the main difference between sociable and aggressive dominance can be understood in terms of social orientation: while the former is characterized by a positive attitude towards others, a central position in groups, a strong need to dominate and a solid self-esteem, the latter is better described by a negative attitude towards other people, a peripheral position in groups, and a strong need to realize one’s own goals even at the expense of personal relationships. Given the positive association of signature size and sociable dominance, larger signatures could be interpreted as a signal of the inclination to stand out and occupy a central position within a group.