Computerized performance monitoring: A review of human resource issues

https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(95)90010-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The increasing use of computerized performance monitoring (CPM) systems across a variety of organizational settings has stirred controversy and induced change into the performance appraisal process. This article reviews research concerning CPM in four general areas which include the impact of CPM on (a) employee attitudes and perceptions; (b) employee stress perceptions; (c) job performance; and, (d) the performance monitoring process. Research based guidelines and issues for the design and implementation of an effective CPM system are suggested. The potential for enhancing employee development is also discussed.

References (73)

  • J.R. Aiello et al.

    Computerized Monitoring of Work Performance: Extending the Social Facilitation Framework to Electronic Presence

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    (1993)
  • M.L. Ambrose et al.

    The Effect of Information Format and Performance Pattern on Performance Appraisal Judgments in a Computerized Performance Monitoring Context

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    (1994)
  • B.C. Amick et al.

    Structural Determinants of the Psychosocial Work Environment: An Exploratory Model of the Role of Technology in Work Stress

    Ergonomics

    (1991)
  • B.C. Amick et al.

    Office Automation, Occupational Stress and Health: A Literature Analysis with Specific Attention to Expert Systems

    Office Technology and People

    (1987)
  • F.N. Angel

    Evaluating Employees by Computer

    Personnel Administrator

    (1989)
  • M. Aspillaga

    Screen Design: Location of Information and Its Effects on Learning

    Journal of Computer-Based Instruction

    (1991)
  • P. Attewell

    Big Brother and the Sweatshop: Computer Surveillance in the Automated Office

    Sociological Theory

    (1987)
  • J.T. Austin et al.

    The Criterion Problem: 1917–1992

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1992)
  • T.T. Baldwin et al.

    Transfer of Training: A Review and Directions for Future Research

    Personnel Psychology

    (1988)
  • I. Benbasat et al.

    An Experimental Program Investigating Color-Enhanced and Graphical Information Presentation: An Integration of the Findings

    Communications of the ACM

    (1986)
  • L. Berkowitz et al.

    External Validity is More Than Skin Deep

    American Psychologist

    (1982)
  • H.J. Bernardin et al.

    Performance Appraisal: Assessing Human Behavior at Work

    (1984)
  • H.J. Bernardin et al.

    Performance Appraisal Design Development, and Implementation

  • H.E. Brogden et al.

    The Dollar Criterion: Applying the Cost Accounting Concept to Criterion Construction

    Personnel Psychology

    (1950)
  • G. Bylinsky

    How Companies Spy on Employees

    Fortune

    (1991)
  • T.P. Cafferty et al.

    Search and Retrieval Patterns for Performance Information: Effects on Evaluation of Multiple Targets

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • J.C. Camillus et al.

    Corporate Strategy and the Design of Computerized Information Systems

    Sloan Management Review

    (1985)
  • J.P. Campbell

    Modeling the Performance Prediction Problem in Industrial and Organizational Psychology

    Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology

    (1990)
  • P. Carayon

    Effect of Electronic Performance Monitoring on Job Design and Worker Stress: Review of the Literature and Conceptual Model

    Human Factors

    (1993)
  • P. Carayon-Sainfort

    The Use of Computers in Offices: Impact on Task Characteristics and Worker Stress

    International Journal of Computer Interaction

    (1992)
  • R.L. Cardy et al.

    Performance Appraisal: Alternative Perspectives

    (1994)
  • J. Chalykoff et al.

    Computer-Aided Monitoring: Its Influence on Employee Job Satisfaction and Turnover

    Personnel Psychology

    (1989)
  • K.B. DeTienne et al.

    Developing an Employee-Centered Electronic Monitoring System

    Journal of Systems Management

    (1993)
  • T.M. Dworkin

    Protecting Private Employees from Enhanced Monitoring: Legislative Approaches

    American Business Law Journal

    (1990)
  • E. Eisenman

    Employee Perception and Supervisory Behaviors in Clerical VDT Work on Systems That Allow Electrons Monitoring

    (1986)
  • D.B. Fenner et al.

    The Impact of Computerized Performance Monitoring and Prior Performance Knowledge on Performance Evaluation

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    (1993)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Humans judge, algorithms nudge: The psychology of behavior tracking acceptance

      2021, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
      Citation Excerpt :

      The experience of negative judgment leads to psychologically aversive feelings (Goffman, 1959; Leary & Baumeister, 2000; Leary & Kowalski, 1990), such as embarrassment (Brown & Garland, 1971; Garland & Brown, 1972; Miller, 1995; Modigliani, 1971), social anxiety (Jackson & Latane, 1981; Schlenker & Leary, 1982), and shame (Tangney, 1992; 1999). As a result of these aversive effects, people desire to avoid negative judgment from others (Aiello & Kolb, 1995; Bates & Holton, 1995; Karim, Kaminsky, & Behrend, 2014; Stanton, 2000; Watson et al., 2013; also see Cottrell, Wack, Sekerak, & Rittle, 1968; Hency & Glass, 1968). The desire to avoid negative judgment constrains people by creating the need to behave in a socially desirable manner.

    • A theory of work gamification: Something old, something new, something borrowed, something cool?

      2017, Human Resource Management Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Evaluation apprehension is a form of stress stemming from one's level of performance concern, and associated with unease introduced by critical observers (Seta, Crisson, Seta, & Wang, 1989). Because the stakes associated with work-related performance are generally high (Spector, Dwyer, & Jex, 1988), evaluation apprehension may be increased if workers not oriented toward competitiveness are unremittingly focused on their performance, and have an awareness that their performance is both continuously tracked (in the form of points, badges, levels, etc.), and visible to others (in the form of leaderboards and character sheets [Bates & Holton, 1995]). Workers low on competitive traits might also respond to work gamification with a lack of interest or indifference to the comparability afforded by game features.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text