Simultaneous adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of molybdenum(VI), uranium(VI), vanadium(V), and antimony(III)

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00218-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The simultaneous adsorptive stripping voltammetric (AdSV) determination of the four elements molybdenum, antimony, vanadium, and uranium as their chloranilic acid (2,5-dichloro-4,6-dihydroxy-1,3-benzoquinone) complexes is described, the parameters of the procedure were varied to produce the best peak resolution with regard to the sensitivity. A pH of 2.3–3 (for sweet or sea water, respectively), a chloranilic acid concentration of 1×10−4 mol l−1 and an accumulation potential of +50 mV were chosen for the analysis. Furthermore, the parameters for the differential pulse mode used were taken into consideration. A set of calibration curves was recorded. The 3σ-detection limits were calculated: 0.18 μg l−1 for uranium, 0.14 μg l−1 for vanadium, 0.27 μg l−1 for antimony (III) and 0.07 μg l−1 for molybdenum. The method was applied to standardized NASS 4 sea water, sea water from the North Fiji Basin, local potable water, and a sewage sample from a suspended uranium slag heap.

The batch-procedure was transferred to an automatic flow-through voltammetric device under parameter optimization.

Introduction

In previous publications the single adsorptive stripping voltammetric (AdSV) determinations for uranium, molybdenum, antimony, vanadium and tin using chloranilic acid as complexing reagent 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 were described. Detection limits of 24 ng l−1 for uranium, 23 ng l−1 for tin, 21 ng l−1 for molybdenum, 210 ng l−1 for antimony(III), 560 ng l−1 for antimony(V), and 21 ng l−1 for vanadium were calculated using accumulation times of up to 5 min. The optimized conditions such as pH, supporting electrolyte solution, accumulation potentials, and the parameters of the differential pulse mode are different for all procedures. In Table 1 the parameters for the single AdSV determinations for all four elements are listed.

The trace analysis of these four elements is important for monitoring their concentrations in the environment. Uranium is present in surface and sea water in a concentration of about 1–3 μg l−1 in the form of the amphoteric uranyl cation (UO2+2). Several complexing reagents already have been applied to determine uranium by AdSV, such as pyrogallol 7, 8, oxine 9, 10, mordant blue 11, 12, cupferron [13], diisopropylmethylphosphate [14], triisobutylphosphate and tripropylphosphate 15, 16 and 4-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-N,N-diethyl-3-hydroxylaniline [17]. The advantage of using chloranilic acid as complexing reagent has already been shown in previous publications 1, 2 as well as in 18, 19.

Vanadium is present in high concentrations in fossil fuels and brought into the environment by combustion of these sources at a rate of more than 100 000 tonnes per year. In waters the dissolved vanadium is normally present as vanadate. Since the solubility of vanadium (IV) salts are very low, these compounds are accumulated in sediments and particles. The German law suggests photometry [20] and inductively-coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) [21] for quantification of vanadium in environmental samples. For aqueous samples, electrochemical methods such as voltammetry are useful. Thereby, usually two reduction steps are mentioned which are assigned from V(V) to V(IV) and from V(IV) to V(II). Different voltammetric techniques can be applied to receive these reduction responses. Acidified supporting electrolyte solutions containing rhodanide is known for the determination of vanadium in bitumen [22]. In petroleum vanadium is analysed by means of alternating current polarography [23]. A catalytic wave using direct current polarography is described in [24]. For lower concentrations of vanadium, the technique of adsorptive stripping voltammetry (AdSV) is suitable. As complexing reagents some compounds are already known in literature, such as pyrogallol [25], 8-hydroxyquinoline [26], catechol [27], antipyrylazo III [28] and cupferron [29] as well as chloranilic acid [4].

Antimony is usually present in the aqueous environment in the oxidation states (III) and (V). Trivalent antimonials are generally more toxic than pentavalent forms [30]. A simple method to distinguish between valence states is cathodic stripping voltammetry after accumulation as amalgam from hydrochloric acid solution [31]. The known AdSV methods using triphenylmethane dyes [32] and catechol [33] as complexing reagent are not selective for the speciation analysis of Sb(III) and Sb(V). A specific determination of the two oxidation states is described in [3]. The method already has been improved by Bond [34].

Molybdenum is ubiquitous in the environment and plays an important role in our ecosystem [30]. The predominant form in which molybdenum occurs at neutral pH in water is MoO2−4[35].The polarographic determination of molybdenum uses the reduction of Mo(VI) to Mo(V) and from Mo(V) to Mo(III) [36]. In recent years several AdSV procedures have been developed using various molybdenum complexes such as with oxine [37], tropolone [38], chloranilic acid [6], Eriochrome Blue Black R [39], and 2-(benzylidene)aminobenzohydroxamic acid [40]. The AdSV determination of molybdenum with mandelic acid [41] and the polarographic determination (using a dropping mercury electrode) with cupferron [42] are based on catalytic reactions of the central atom. In conclusion of a comparison of different adsorptive stripping voltammetric techniques, which is submitted for publication [43] chloranilic acid was found to be the best complexing reagent for application in batch and flow through voltammetry beside oxine, tropolon and cupferron.

One main advantage of voltammetry is the ability to apply oligo element analysis. The anodic stripping voltammetry of zinc, cadmium, lead and copper in one run is used in routine analysis [44]. Some well-established AdSV procedures allow a simultaneous determination of several elements, such as cobalt and nickel with dimethylglyoxime [44] or nickel, cobalt, cadmium, lead and copper with 1-phenylpropane-1-pentylsulfonylhydrazone-2-oxime as chelating reagent [45], as well as titanium and molybdenum with mandelic acid and iron(III), vanadium (V) and manganese with solvochrome violet [46].

The application of wide band complex forming reagents is often of little use for application to real samples, because many elements produce signals which then interfere with one another. Chloranilic acid, in contrast, only forms electroactive and adsorbable complexes with a hand full of elements, as mentioned above.

In this work a procedure for the simultaneous determination of uranium, vanadium, antimony, and molybdenum is developed. All four elements are relevant for environmental analysis. The mean concentrations are in the sub-μg l−1 range and, therewith, under the detection limits of most other analytical methods, like inductively-coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) or atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). For voltammetry, however, low analyte concentrations can even be easily determined in samples with high salinity, such as sea water samples, without interference.

Section snippets

Apparatus

All voltammetric measurements were performed using a 693 VA Processor in combination with the 694 VA Stand or the 756 VA Trace Analyser with the 747 VA Stand (all from Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland). The three-electrode configuration consists of the hanging mercury drop (HMDE) produced from the Multi Mode electrode (Metrohm) as working electrode, a platinum wire (batch) or a glassy carbon tip (flow through cell) as auxiliary electrode and an Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl)-electrode as reference electrode. For all

Results and discussion

The formation of the complexes, their stability, and the potentials of reduction are strongly dependent upon the pH value of the solution. As seen in Table 1, the optimized pH of the supporting electrolytes for the single determinations of the four cations range from 2.3 to 4. In Fig. 2 the dependence of peak potential and peak height upon pH are plotted. With respect to sufficient resolution and sensitivity of the peaks, a pH of 2.3 was chosen for further experiments if not otherwise mentioned.

Conclusions

The described method enables the determination of uranium(VI), vanadium(V), molybdenum(VI), and antimony(III) in one run. Thereby, the determination of the toxic species antimony(III) is restricted to the direct analysis of fresh waters due to the oxidation to antimony(V) after digestion. In natural sea water the concentrations of vanadium can be too low to analyse with the initial method. In this case the sensitivity of the determination of vanadium can be increased when the pH of sample is

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out with financial support of the BMBF (Germany) project 02WU9608/9. All instrumentation was donated by Metrohm. Sea water samples were taken and analysed during the SO134 research cruise under the guidance of Prof. P. Halbach and A. Koschinsky (FU-Berlin). This project was also supported by the BMBF. Many thanks to Ch. Arndt, who applied the method onboard.

References (46)

  • S. Sander et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1995)
  • F. Heppeler et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1996)
  • N.K. Lam et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1983)
  • C.M.G. van den Berg et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1984)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Analyst

    (1986)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Talanta

    (1987)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1992)
  • H. Berge et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1971)
  • S. Sander et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1997)
  • G. Svehla et al.

    Talanta

    (1976)
  • S.B.O. Adeloju et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1994)
  • M. Vega et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1994)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Talanta

    (1992)
  • Kh. Brainina et al.

    Talanta

    (1974)
  • G. Capodaglio et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1987)
  • A. Bond et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1998)
  • S.H. Khan et al.

    Mar. Chem.

    (1989)
  • K. Jiao et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1992)
  • S. Sander et al.

    Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem.

    (1994)
  • W. Wagner et al.

    Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem.

    (1996)
  • S. Sander et al.

    Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem.

    (1996)
  • M. Karakaplan et al.

    Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem.

    (1992)
  • C.M.G. van den Berg et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (1987)
  • Cited by (98)

    • Sensors for determination of uranium: A review

      2019, TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      From Table 9, it could find that most of sensors by ASV method have a good sensitivity (the order of magnitude of 10−9–10−10) and those of C58 and C62 even reach the order of 10−11, which is due to the function of pre-adsorption. Moreover, most of the ligands usually detect uranyl ions under neutral condition, but some ligands can detect under strong acidic (C55 [189] and C62 [196–198]) or strong alkaline (C51 [183,184]). However, some of sensors are still interfered by Cu(II), Fe(III), Cd(II) or Pb(II) (Table 9).

    • Ultrasensitive catalytic-adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of molybdenum using a Mo(VI)-chloranilic acid-chlorate system

      2016, Electrochimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      The results of the determination of molybdenum in the investigated extracts from two different fly ashes are presented in Table 1. The adsorptive stripping voltammetric protocol of the determination of molybdenum in the form of a complex with chloranilic acid is well-known and has often been applied for its sensitive quantification [16,44–48]. In our work, we observed that after the addition of chlorate to the solution containing the Mo(VI)-CAA complex, a new catalytic adsorptive stripping voltammetric peak appears at a more positive potential (Ep ≈ −0.23 V) (Fig. 1); this peak is several times higher than the adsorptive peak at −0.65 V, which has been exploited in the typical AdSV procedure.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text