Coyness, philandering and stable strategies
References (16)
- et al.
A model of mate desertion
Anim. Behav.
(1978) - et al.
A note on evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics
J. theor. Biol.
(1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict
A note on evolutionarily stable strategies in asymmetrical animal conflicts
J. theor. Biol.
(1980)- et al.
Evolutionarily stable strategies and game dynamics
Math. Biosci.
(1978) - et al.
Parental investment: a prospective analysis
Anim. Behav.
(1977)
Cited by (73)
On structural stability of evolutionary stable strategies
2024, Journal of Differential EquationsSocial relationship adjustments within the same sex promote marital bliss
2022, Journal of Theoretical BiologyPersistent strange attractors in 3D polymatrix replicators
2022, Physica D: Nonlinear PhenomenaEvolution of trustfulness in the case where resources for cooperation are sometimes absent
2022, Theoretical Population BiologyCitation Excerpt :Then, a strategy where individuals want to keep the interaction with those who possess no resources for cooperation and defect is likely to evolve again. The above reasoning implies a cyclical character (cf. Dawkins, 1976; Hofbauer and Sigmund, 1998; Maynard Smith, 1982; Schuster and Sigmund, 1981): if a player hopes to keep the interaction, then a player deceives; if a player deceives, a player hopes to stop the interaction; if a player hopes to stop the interaction, a player does not deceive; if a player does not deceive, a player wishes to keep the interaction. It would be interesting to perform a mathematical investigation of whether such a cyclic sequence actually emerges (e.g., the system oscillates in a stable limit cycle, the system converges to a stable focus) or not.
Strange attractors and nontrivial solutions in games with three players
2022, Chaos, Solitons and FractalsImpact of binary social status with hierarchical punishment on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game
2020, Chaos, Solitons and FractalsCitation Excerpt :In addition, the asymmetry among players has received substantial attention recently [26–28]. In nature, asymmetry arises frequently in interspecies interactions [4]and among subpopulations [29–32]. In fact, this diversity is presented in not only animal world but also human society.