Biodiversity characterization at landscape level using geospatial modelling technique
Introduction
India is known for its genetic and species richness in a wide variety of ecological zones. Increasing human intervention and excessive exploitation of resources have resulted in great changes and provide alarming signals of accelerated biodiversity loss. The conventional species level approach for biodiversity management has major limitations, and a major change in understanding the priorities of biological conservation and management (Kempf, 1993) has resulted in a policy shift from conservation of single species to their habitats. The management of habitats through interactive network of species at landscape level is considered important (Orians, 1993, Edwards et al., 1994). Study of the landscape at patch level is an appealing ecological basis for understanding these processes (Wu and Loucks, 1996). Landscape ecology seeks to understand the ecological functions of larger areas and hypothesizes that spatial arrangement of ecosystems, habitats or communities has ecological implications (Romme and Knight, 1982, Tuner, 1987). Landscape analyses at broad spatial scale is becoming increasingly important for biodiversity conservation. Fragmentation of ecological units have been well documented at landscape level using patch size, shape, abundance and forest matrix characteristics (Forman and Godron, 1986, Lehmkuhl and Ruggiero, 1991, Ripple et al., 1991, Skole and Tucker, 1993, Shirish and Roy, 1997). Ecosystem degradation and patch characteristics are found to be associated with the degree of spatial fragmentation (Ludeke et al., 1990, Mertens and Lambin, 1997, Roy et al., 1997). Characterization of habitats, their configuration and fragmentation, on the other hand provide reliable information on biodiversity distribution patterns. Hence, habitat characterization at the landscape level is a major issue for investigation by landscape ecologists.
The site specific studies use theoretical principles in conservation biology which are often inadequately tested in the field. These principles are being used as a framework to guide management plans, with obvious limitations of being applicable in the spatial context (Abbott, 1980). Application of landscape ecological principles for prioritizing the biodiversity rich sites has the advantage of integrating spatial information, non-spatial information and horizontal relationships in space and time. The landscape approach for biodiversity characterization also addresses some of the limitations of ground based point inventory.
Recent developments in satellite remote sensing and a geographic information system (GIS) coupled with user oriented computer programs allow us to use landscape ecological principles for biodiversity characterization at landscape level more efficiently (Roy et al., 1999). The present study hypothesizes biological richness at landscape level as a function of habitat, biogeographical setting, disturbance regime and environmental complexity (Fig. 1). The paper presents an approach for biodiversity characterization at landscape level using geospatial techniques. The approach has been validated in one of the biologically rich sites of North-East India — Meghalaya. Remote sensing data has been used primarily to stratify habitats, vegetation types, landuse and their association. The stratumwise ground data have provided properties of the habitats. Environmental complexity can be spatially estimated based on terrain and climate variability. The surrogate parameters determining the phytodiversity have been taken into consideration for geospatial modelling of biodiversity characterization at landscape level.
Section snippets
Study area
The present study has been carried out in Meghalaya, located in the north eastern region of India (Fig. 2). The north eastern region of India has been recognised as none of the most florally and faunally diverse regions by biogeographers. North-East India is a transitional zone between Indian, Indo-Malayan and Indo-Chinese biogeographical zones as well as the confluence of the Himalayan region with peninsular India (Rao, 1994). The highly humid and tropical climate of the region supports
Remote sensing data
IRS 1B false colour composite (FCC) bands 4, 3 and 2 (scale 1:250,000) have been used for the present study. This satellite has been visually interpreted to prepare a vegetation type map for two time periods viz., 1989 and 1995. The details of the satellite data used for visual interpretation have been listed in Table 1. No cloud free data of 1970s (image or digital) was available from the National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA) data archives. The oldest available information on the spatial
Land dynamics
The vegetation type maps prepared by visual interpretation of satellite images of periods 1980, 1989 and 1995 have been the primary source for studying the land dynamics and patch characteristics in the Meghalaya landscape (Fig. 4). The classification scheme, adapted from Champion and Seth (1968) classifies the vegetation types of Meghalaya into six types viz., tropical evergreen, tropical semi-evergreen, sub tropical broad leaved hill forest, tropical moist deciduous, grasslands and savannas
Discussion
Tropical deforestation and the resulting loss of biological diversity have raised major concerns among ecologists during recent years. The loss of biodiversity has been attributed to the destruction of habitat, isolation of fragments of formerly contiguous habitats and edge effects within a boundary zone between forest and deforested areas. Meghalaya is considered significant for biodiversity conservation because of its floristic richness and high level of endemism. Almost all the landscapes
References (30)
Theories dealing with land birds on islands
Advances in Ecological Research
(1980)- et al.
An analysis of anthropogenic deforestation using logistic regression and GIS
Journal of Environmental Management
(1990) - et al.
Measuring forest landscape pattern in the Cascade Range of Oregon, U.S.A.
Biological Conservation
(1991) - et al.
Cropping pattern and yields in agricultural systems of the north eastern hill region of India
Agro-ecosystem
(1981) - Anonymous, 1985. Satellite remote sensing survey of natural resources of Meghalaya. Project report prepared by NRSA for...
- et al.
Economic value of plant diversity in arid environments
Nature and Resources
(1996) - Champion, H.G., Seth, S.K., 1968. A revised survey of forest types of India (New Delhi: Govt....
- Edwards, P.J., May, R.M., Wedd, N.R. (Eds.), 1994. Large Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology. Blackwell Scientific...
- et al.
Landscape Ecology
(1986) A new way to oversee public's forests?
American Forests
(1993)
Effectiveness of the protected area network in biodiversity conservation a case study of Meghalaya
Biodiversity and Conservation
Modeling and monitoring landcover change processes in tropical regions
Progress in Physical Geography
Application of geographic information system and a landscape ecology approach to biodiversity conservation in the Western Ghats
Current Science
Cited by (137)
GIS based modelling to aid conservation of two endangered plant species (Ebenus armitagei and Periploca angustifolia) at Wadi Al-Afreet, Egypt
2020, Remote Sensing Applications: Society and EnvironmentGeospatial techniques in sustainable forest management for ecorestoration and different environmental protection issues
2024, Ecorestoration for SustainabilitySPATIAL CONSERVATION PRIORITIZATION OF LANDSCAPES IN NILGIRI BIOSPHERE RESERVE, WESTERN GHATS
2024, Biodiversity Hotspot of the Western Ghats and Sri LankaA Scoping Review of Modelling Techniques for Ecological Connectivity in Heterogeneous Landscape
2023, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote SensingEffects of Disturbance Regimes on Phytodiversity of Similipal Biosphere Reserve, India
2023, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing