Original ArticlesAn experimental study of well-defined turbulent nonpremixed spray flames
Introduction
Spray combustion is an important aspect of combustion technology. Its most common manifestation is as nonpremixed flames, which have been investigated experimentally with advanced laser diagnostic techniques either in laminar environments 1, 2 or in more realistic and complex turbulent ones [e.g., 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. If the latter are to mimic practical spray flames, one major difficulty associated with the rich variety of practical systems arises in their design. Different spray injectors, often tailored to specific combustor geometries, produce different patterns. The resulting atomization “signature” on the droplet initial conditions usually controls the spray flame development and morphology, especially in the case of inertial droplets. This variability is necessary for practical purposes, but may hinder a fundamental understanding of spray flames, because of the complex relationship between injector design, droplet initial conditions, and the atomization process. As a result, there is no “universal” spray flame. Yet certain principles or features are common to most practical realizations. For example, aspects of group combustion models of spray burning 10, 11 may apply, to a different extent, to portions of all spray flames. Another broad classification can be based on spray flame diluteness. Most practical ones can be often dense, while laboratory configurations tend to be dilute. The behavior of the two can be quite different, since in the former case a “two-way” coupling between the two phases is expected and the presence of the droplets influences the behavior of the gas.
Advanced laser diagnostic techniques that are crucial to progress in such challenging environments have been introduced at a slower pace by comparison with gaseous turbulent flames, principally because of difficulties associated with the presence of the dispersed phase. In particular, techniques for the physical characterization of the system (e.g, droplet size and velocity statistics) are well-established. They overwhelmingly rely on phase Doppler anemometry. Detailed measurements of this type have been performed for a number of years in combustion environments, starting with [12]. On the other hand, spectroscopic studies for the identification of chemical species have been slow to emerge, often limited to feasibility studies of laser-induced fluorescence 13, 14, 15 and spontaneous Raman spectroscopy 16, 17. Perhaps the most comprehensive investigation among the latter is a characterization of the near field structure of a practical spray flame by a combination of coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS) and phase Doppler techniques [18].
In view of the difficulties of identifying a paradigm spray flame, our approach in this investigation had the goal of studying selectively aspects of spray combustion that are of general, if not universal, nature in some regions of practical sprays. The resulting design was guided by the need to minimize the importance of initial conditions and, consequently, the influence of the specific injector. Droplet concentrations were chosen to establish a group combustion of drops in a convective-diffusive boundary layer flow. Diluteness effects were also accounted for, with large drop concentrations prevailing close to the injector and leading to strong coupling between the two phases, and with one-way coupling dominating in the far field. In addition to phase Doppler techniques, Raman scattering was extensively used to map the temperature field. As a result of this comprehensive effort, a picture of a simplified turbulent spray flame emerges and an extensive database is established for subsequent computational modeling. The present article focuses on the phenomenology of such a flame, the description of its structure, and the presentation of an extensive database. Self-similarity and scaling were addressed quantitatively in a companion article [19].
Section snippets
Burner design criteria
The design of a “canonical” turbulent spray flame was a first requirement of this investigation. It was guided by two principles: maximizing the turbulence level, to offset the inevitable relaminarization of the high combustion temperatures; and minimizing the effect of the drop initial conditions. These goals were realized with the burner sketched in Fig. 1. The liquid fuel was injected using a commercial ultrasonic nebulizer (Sonotek) that can disperse modest liquid flow rates, while
Chemiluminescence imaging
A few images (150-μs exposure time) of the visible chemiluminescence from a typical spray flame are shown in Fig. 5. The ruler on the right is in burner diameter units. The pictures show the rich morphology of these flames and confirm the realization of the burner design objectives. Evident in the sequence, particularly close to the burner exit, is an inner dark region, which can be best seen in a medium-exposure (1 ms) image shown in the inset. Flame corrugations are less pronounced close to
Conclusions
A comprehensive experimental study was conducted in simplified turbulent spray flames using phase Doppler interferometric techniques, spontaneous Raman spectroscopy, and chemiluminescence imaging. The role of the initial conditions was deliberately minimized by using an ultrasonic nebulizer for the dispersion of the liquid phase, thereby ensuring that the velocity slip between the two phases was small. Two methanol flames were studied in detail, corresponding to Reynolds numbers of 2.1 × 104
Acknowledgements
The support of NASA, under the Microgravity Science and Applications Program, Grants NAG3-1259 and NAG3-1688, and of NSF, through a NSF Young Investigator Award and Equipment Grant CTS-9112601, is gratefully acknowledged.
References (36)
- et al.
Combust. Flame
(1997) - et al.
Combust. Flame
(1994) - et al.
- et al.
- et al.
- et al.
Combust. Flame
(1989)- et al.
Combust. Flame
(1978) - et al.
Combust. Sci. Technol.
(1996) - et al.
Atomiz. Sprays
(1993)
Combust. Sci. Technol.
Combust. Sci. Technol.
Cited by (55)
Are the available data from laboratory spray burners suitable for CFD modelling validations? A review
2022, Energy Conversion and Management: XSpontaneous Raman-LIF-CO-OH measurements of species concentration in turbulent spray flames
2021, Proceedings of the Combustion InstituteCitation Excerpt :The difficulty lies in the weak Raman signals which get obliterated by intense interferences arising from several sources, including breakdown of the suspended particles or droplets. Earlier attempts to apply conventional Raman scattering to turbulent spray flames are limited and include measurements of both Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman scattering from nitrogen to obtain the gas temperature [20,21]. A similar approach, but with the addition of Raman imaging of fuel, has been employed in the non-reacting region of sprays, injected into an engine to yield equivalence ratio and temperature [22].
Investigation of fuel dilution in ethanol spray MILD combustion
2019, Applied Thermal EngineeringCO Imaging in piloted liquid-spray flames using femtosecond two-photon LIF
2019, Proceedings of the Combustion InstituteCitation Excerpt :However, dilution effects are present in the far field from the spray exit of group combustion. Karpetis and Gomez [5] measured droplet number densities in turbulent non-premixed flames and stated that large droplet densities were achieved at the centerline close to the exit while the densities were reduced significantly along the axial position due to the dispersion and evaporation of the jet spray. Previous studies of spray combustion have been mainly focused on the characterization of various sprays using laser-based techniques [6–8].
Experimental investigation of turbulent flames in uniform dispersions of ethanol droplets
2017, Combustion and FlameCitation Excerpt :In comparison to the field of turbulent premixed flames where a larger collection of data measuring parameters pertinent to flame structure and propagation (such as burning rates, displacement speeds, surface density, curvature statistics) are widely available [17], such information is not readily available for turbulent spray flames [18]. Additionally, the majority of the detailed work on flame structure and propagation in droplet-laden mixtures has focused on laminar flows, with few studies investigating turbulence effects in detail available in the literature [19–22]. The lack of data on the canonical problem of turbulent planar flame propagating in a uniform dispersion of droplets, which is fundamental to understanding spray flame stabilisation and important applications such as gas turbine relight, has been highlighted in a recent review article [23].
Characterization of atomization and combustion in moderately dense turbulent spray flames
2015, Combustion and Flame