On the possible occurrence of ‘archaeomagnetic jerks’ in the geomagnetic field over the past three millennia

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00362-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Archaeomagnetism can provide a high-resolution full-vector description of the Earth’s magnetic field for the past several thousand years. We analyse the bulk of archaeomagnetic data (both direction and intensity) obtained recently in Western Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean covering the past three millennia. We demonstrate a remarkable coincidence between sharp cusps in geomagnetic field direction and intensity maxima (two clear ones at ∼AD 200 and 1400; two presently less well constrained at ∼800 BC and AD 800). These sharp changes may constitute a new feature of geomagnetic secular variation (‘archaeomagnetic jerks’) with time characteristics intermediate between ‘geomagnetic jerks’ and ‘magnetic excursions’.

Introduction

A major interest of archaeomagnetism is to provide a high-resolution full-vector description of the Earth’s magnetic field over the past several thousand years, including the temporal behaviour of its dipole and non-dipole components [1], [2], [3]. This clearly cannot be expected from palaeomagnetic studies of series of lava flows, because of the episodic nature of lava emplacement and radiometric age uncertainties. Continuous high-resolution sedimentary records may appear much more promising (e.g. [4], [5]), but we still understand insufficiently the link between sedimentation processes and magnetic acquisition. Archaeomagnetism, i.e. the study of remanent magnetisation of historically dated artefacts, remains our prime source of information over these millennial and centennial time scales. Unfortunately, no complete archaeomagnetic description of geomagnetic secular variation (SV) satisfying currently required standards has yet been obtained for any single region at the millennium scale. This is even the case in regions boasting a long and rich cultural past, such as the Middle East, China, Central and western South America or Western Europe. In some cases, only directional data exist in sufficient amount (and quality) to provide a relatively continuous record over the past few millennia [6]; in others, only (or mostly) archaeointensity results are available (e.g. China, Middle East, South America [7], [8], [9]). Moreover, most archaeointensity data sets from different regions display a large dispersion, which often prevents a consistent description of intensity variations [10]. This scatter likely reflects differences in experimental procedure and the insufficient reliability of many archaeointensity data, particularly those obtained more than 20 years ago [10], [11], [12].

In this study, we analyse the bulk of archaeomagnetic data (both direction and intensity) covering the last three millennia obtained recently in Western Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean [10], [11], [13], [14], which show evidence for a remarkable coincidence between sharp cusps in geomagnetic field direction and intensity maxima: two clear ones at ∼AD 200 and AD 1400 and two presently less well constrained at ∼800 BC and AD 800. These rather sharp changes may constitute a new feature of geomagnetic SV (‘archaeomagnetic jerks’) with time characteristics intermediate between ‘geomagnetic jerks’ and ‘magnetic excursions’.

Section snippets

New archaeomagnetic data from France and Syria

New directional data have been acquired from fired hearths and pottery kilns in France, archaeologically dated to the first millennium BC [13]. Combining these data with previous archaeomagnetic results from Western Europe, we have constructed a composite smoothed directional SV curve, encompassing the entire first millennium BC. Together with the curve of Bucur [15], which spans the last two millennia and is in very good agreement with the curve derived from South Italian volcanics [16], we

Discussion

Fig. 2b shows an overall decreasing trend with the occurrence of several intensity maxima. Two are defined by relatively numerous data at ∼AD 200 and AD 1400, whereas two other maxima with larger amplitudes, at ∼750 BC and AD 800, are less well constrained in France so far (Fig. 2b). We note that the two best-defined intensity maxima coincide in time with the two sharpest directional cusps seen in Fig. 2a, whereas coincidence of the other two maxima with the other two major directional changes

Acknowledgments

This is IPGP contribution No. 1920 and INSU-CNRS No. 346. We thank Gauthier Hulot, Maxime Le Goff and Jean-Louis le Mouël for useful comments and discussions. We are also grateful to M. McElhinny, S. Banerjee and R. Merrill for constructive reviews of the manuscript.[BARD]

References (33)

  • C. Constable et al.

    Global geomagnetic field models for the past 3000 yeras: transient or permanent flux lobes?

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London

    (2000)
  • M. Korte, C. Constable, Continuous global geomagnetic field models for the past 3000 years, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter....
  • I. Snowball et al.

    Geomagnetic field variations in northern Sweden during the Holocene quantified from varved lake sediments and their implications for cosmogenic nuclide production rates

    Holocene

    (2002)
  • S. Yang et al.

    Tracking a non dipole geomagnetic anomaly using new archaeointensity results from north-east China

    Geophys. J. Int.

    (1993)
  • S. Yang et al.

    Archaeointensity studies of Peruvian pottery - from 1200 B.C. to 1800 A.D

    J. Geomagn. Geoelectr.

    (1993)
  • A. Genevey, Y. Gallet, J. Margueron, Eight thousand years of geomagnetic field intensity variations in the Eastern...
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text