Evolution of starting mantle plumes: a comparison between numerical and laboratory models
Referencess (18)
- et al.
An alternative mechanism for flood basalt formation
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(1995) - et al.
Stirring and structure in mantle starting plumes
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(1990) Penetration of plates and plumes through the mantle transition zone
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(1995)- et al.
Pulsating diapiric flows: consequences of vertical variations in mantle creep laws
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(1992) Plate motions and deep mantle convection
Mem. Geol. Soc. Am.
(1972)- et al.
Seismological detection of a mantle plume?
Nature
(1993) - et al.
Seismic evidence for a fossil mantle plume beneath South America and implications for plate driving forces
Nature
(1995) - et al.
Imaging the three-dimensional upper mantle velocity structure of the Icelandic hot spot
EOS Trans. AGU
(1995) - et al.
Hotspots, mantle plumes, flood basalts, and true polar wander
Rev. Geophys.
(1991)
Cited by (101)
A review of large low shear velocity provinces and ultra low velocity zones
2019, TectonophysicsThe role of deep subduction in supercontinent breakup
2018, TectonophysicsThe role of viscosity contrast on plume structure in laboratory modeling of mantle convection
2017, Chemical Engineering ScienceDo mantle plumes preserve the heterogeneous structure of their deep-mantle source?
2016, Earth and Planetary Science LettersEffect of viscosity contrast on plume formation in density stratified fluids
2015, Chemical Engineering ScienceThe Mesoproterozoic thermal evolution of the Musgrave Province in central Australia - Plume vs. the geological record
2015, Gondwana ResearchCitation Excerpt :This early view of mantle plumes provided an eloquent explanation for some large and linear and often intra-plate thermal anomalies that found no obvious or easy explanation within the plate tectonic paradigm we widely accept. It has itself gained widespread acceptance backed by strong theoretical and experimental support (e.g. Griffiths and Campbell, 1990; van Keken, 1997: Campbell and Davies, 2006) and by seismic tomography data that have been interpreted to image discrete crust to core low-velocity columns beneath these near surface thermal anomalies (e.g. Nolet et al., 2006; Zhao, 2009). However, when the large and increasing number of plumes or hotspots that are proposed to be currently active or to have been active within the last 100 m.y. (at least 60 according to Zhao, 2007) are viewed in this context, the number for which firm support for a deep mantle origin can be given is actually quite small (7–12; e.g. Courtillot et al., 2003; Zhao, 2007).