Evolution of starting mantle plumes: a comparison between numerical and laboratory models

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00042-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Laboratory experiments on the initiation and development of mantle plumes suggest the formation of a bulbous plume head that grows in time by entrainment of surrounding material, followed by a thin feeder conduit. This type of plume is generally not seen in numerical models of mantle convection. To better determine the possible differences between numerical and laboratory experiments, we have numerically reproduced a published laboratory experiment on plume initiation. Theoretical predictions for the growth of the plume head have been verified and the experiments allowed for a new determination of a similarity constant. Models with a constant viscosity fluid show much less entrainment. Simulations using a plume rising from a thermal boundary layer with an olivine-type temperature-dependence show that most of the source material is contained in the plume head and that the conduit is largely composed of entrained material. Simulations with a more realistic non-Newtonian rheology show that plumes can rise much faster through the mantle, which will lead to higher temperatures of the plume head at the Earth's surface compared to what experiments with Newtonian rheology suggest.

Referencess (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (101)

  • The Mesoproterozoic thermal evolution of the Musgrave Province in central Australia - Plume vs. the geological record

    2015, Gondwana Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    This early view of mantle plumes provided an eloquent explanation for some large and linear and often intra-plate thermal anomalies that found no obvious or easy explanation within the plate tectonic paradigm we widely accept. It has itself gained widespread acceptance backed by strong theoretical and experimental support (e.g. Griffiths and Campbell, 1990; van Keken, 1997: Campbell and Davies, 2006) and by seismic tomography data that have been interpreted to image discrete crust to core low-velocity columns beneath these near surface thermal anomalies (e.g. Nolet et al., 2006; Zhao, 2009). However, when the large and increasing number of plumes or hotspots that are proposed to be currently active or to have been active within the last 100 m.y. (at least 60 according to Zhao, 2007) are viewed in this context, the number for which firm support for a deep mantle origin can be given is actually quite small (7–12; e.g. Courtillot et al., 2003; Zhao, 2007).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text