Technical noteA mathematical formula to calculate the theoretical range of motion for total hip replacement
Introduction
Subjects with a normal hip joint have 120° flexion in common activities of daily living (ADL) (Johnson and Smidt, 1970). The reduced range of motion (ROM) resulting from total hip replacement (THR) leads to frequent prosthetic impingement, which may restrict ADL and cause subluxation and dislocation. It may also increase polyethylene debris and contribute to prosthetic loosening. Therefore, to know the ROM of THR is very important in both short- and long-term clinical situations and in the design of prostheses. Its ROM can be obtained by very expensive Computer Graphics: a 3D CAD model from each manufacturer of each of their total hip designs and sizes (3D-CG) or hip joint models, but it takes a lot of time and labor (Jaramaz et al., 1998; Kummer et al., 1999; Robinson et al., 1997; Scifert et al., 1998; Seki et al., 1998; D’Lima et al., 2000). Our objective is to create a mathematical formula that is able to calculate the ROM of THR in a very easy and accurate way, to reveal the effect on ROM of the oscillation angle and the interaction of ROM with cup abduction, anterior opening and neck anteversion.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The ROM of THR is governed by the following five factors. (1) Prosthetic ROM (oscillation angle), θ. (2) Cup abduction, α. (3) Cup anterior opening, β. (4) The angle of the neck position from the horizontal plane, a. (5) The anteversion of neck around the vertical axis (long body axis) from coronal plane, b.
The limit of the neck motion due to the impingement in the cup with a flat surface is described as a cone (the prosthetic ROM cone). The vertical angle of this cone is named as prosthetic
Results
- 1.
A θ greater than 120° seems to be necessary to fulfill an acceptable ROM. When a was fixed to 52° and b was fixed to 15°, FL and ER were calculated for different oscillation angles (θ=100°–135°) in three cup positions (α=35°,β=10°), (α=45°,β=20°), (α=55°,β=30°). A 120° oscillation angle gives only 99° FL and 80° ER in (α=35°,β=10°), 139° FL and only 28° ER in (α=55°,β=30°), and 119° FL and 51° ER even in (α=45°,β=20°).
- 2.
We created the 3D graphs showing the interaction of α and β to FL, ER and EXT
Discussion
These formulas are a very accurate, fast and easy way to get the ROM for a THR with a flat surface cup and a symmetric neck. The oscillation angle is taken from the company data or measured from a blueprint of the cup, head and neck shape. The values of α and β of the cup position and a and b of the neck position can be measured or calculated from an accurate anterior–posterior X-ray view, and an axial CT view of the THR (see Appendix C at Website).
Lewinnek proposed a cup position with
Supplementary data
Acknowledgements
We are most grateful to Ms. K. Ohkuni for the data of ROM of THR by the 3D-CG.
References (8)
- et al.
The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation
Journal of Arthroplasty
(1999) - et al.
The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
(2000) - et al.
Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement
Clinical Orthopaedics
(1998) - et al.
Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living
Clinical Orthopaedics
(1970)
Cited by (61)
Hip replacement: Clinical perspectives
2021, Joint Replacement TechnologyCalculation of impingement-free combined cup and stem alignments based on the patient-specific pelvic tilt
2019, Journal of BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :Methods calculating suitable cup orientations based on the ROM using three-dimensional (3D) computer simulation (Widmer and Zurfluh, 2004) or finite element simulation (Elkins et al., 2015) might not be suitable for clinical routine as they might be time-consuming and complex. By contrast, the method described by Yoshimine and Ginbayashi (Yoshimine and Ginbayashi, 2002) is fast because it is an analytical mathematical solution, however, an extension to considering arbitrary motion is not straightforward. A ROM-based target zone calculation algorithm which does not rely on 3D simulations and collision detection but does integrate arbitrary motion is introduced in this work.
Risk evaluation method for range of motion after total hip arthroplasty applying monte-carlo simulation
2018, Procedia Computer ScienceFemoral head diameter considerations for primary total hip arthroplasty
2015, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and ResearchCitation Excerpt :A 32-mm head makes these activities possible in 93.7% of cases compared with only 84% for a 26-mm head [27]. Many authors have confirmed that heads larger than 32-mm in diameter not only improve range of motion but completely eliminate the risk of neck/cup impingement [20–27]. Nonetheless, there is a threshold effect at 38 mm, after which the impingement risk becomes negligible [27,28].