Elsevier

Journal of Biomechanics

Volume 36, Issue 8, August 2003, Pages 1209-1214
Journal of Biomechanics

Short communication
Elasticity of alveolar bone near dental implant–bone interfaces after one month's healing

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00113-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Information is scarce about Young's modulus of healing bone surrounding an implant. The purpose of this preliminary study is to quantify elastic properties of pig alveolar bone that has healed for 1 month around titanium threaded dental implants, using the nanoindentation method. Two 2-year-old Sinclair miniswine were used for the study. Nanoindentation tests perpendicular to the bucco-lingual cross section were performed on harvested implant–bone blocks using the Hysitron TriboScope III. Nomarski differential interference contrast microscopy was used to identify pyramidal indentation measurements that were from bone. Reduced moduli, averaged for all anatomical regions, were found to start low (6.17 GPa) at the interface and gradually increase (slope=0.014) to a distance of 150 μm (7.89 GPa) from the implant surface, and then flatten to a slope of 0.001 from 150 to 1500 μm (10.13 GPa). Mean reduced modulus and its relationship to distance did not differ significantly by anatomic location (e.g., coronal, middle, and apical third; P⩾0.28 for all relevant tests) at 1 month after implantation.

Introduction

Early loading on oral implants to promote osseointegration has not been consistently successful (Szmukler-Moncler et al., 1998), partly because the biomechanics of the interfacial bone are ill-understood. At early healing stages prior to maturation, microproperties of healing bone may depend on distance from the implant interface and on anatomic location. The physical properties (e.g., ultrasound propagation and microhardness) of such tissues are, in fact, microscopically heterogeneous across the interface (Zimmerman et al., 1989; Huja et al., 1998). Young's modulus—which differs from hardness, determining stress and strain distributions around the implant and is thus more important in studying osseointegration—has not been measured near the implant–bone interface (Brunski, 1999).

The present study used the nanoindentation method (Ko et al., 1995; Rho et al (1997), Rho et al (1999); Turner et al., 1999; Zysset et al., 1999) to measure interfacial elasticity of pig alveolar bone that has healed for 1 month around threaded titanium dental implants. Young's moduli were measured at μm scale for multiple distances from the interface. Confirmation of data from tissue indents was obtained using Nomarski differential interference contrast (DIC) light microscopy.

Section snippets

Method

The 4th premolar of two 2-year-old Sinclair miniswine (weight 58 kg, Sinclair Research Center Inc., Columbia, MO) was surgically removed unilaterally (Animal Protocol #9910A22661). A smooth titanium threaded dental implant (3.75 mm diameter and 13 mm length, Walter Lorenz Co., Jacksonville, FL) was inserted in the alveolar ridge after the extraction wound had healed for 7 months. The implant was protected from bite forces for 1 month, then the animal was sacrificed.

Implant–bone blocks were

Results

A scatterplot smoother found that reduced moduli averaged 6.17 GPa at the interface, gradually increased until about 150 μm from the implant, then flattened out (Fig. 3A). The overall means of reduced modulus for the two animals did not differ (animal main effect P=0.48) (Table 2).

Analyzing according to the distance groups, elastic modulus was lower within 150 μm of the interface, but did not differ among the three most distant groupings (distance main effect P<0.0001). Linear regression using

Discussion

A small but significant gradient in elastic modulus was found out to be 1500 μm. A distinct change in elasticity was identified roughly 150 μm from the interface, as suggested by Fig. 3. However, our data do not support a preference for a threshold of 150 μm over nearby values, e.g. 135 or 165 μm. It is unlikely that any sharp biological threshold exists; 150 μm is a convenient round number. The wide data variation associated with tissue microstructures indicates that micromechanical analyses

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by the Whitaker Foundation (RG97-455), Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, the Graduate School of University of Minnesota, and NIDCR grant DE 09737. Thanks to Mr. Manuel Chan for his assistance in analyzing data.

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (63)

  • Spatial variation of bone biomechanical properties around a dental implant using nanoindentation: a case study

    2018, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
    Citation Excerpt :

    The replacement of teeth and the correction of bony defects in the jaw have been effectively performed using endosseous implants made out of commercially pure titanium with excellent biocompatibility (Brånemark et al., 1983; Chang et al., 2003).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text