Unusual wetting dynamics of aqueous surfactant solutions on polymer surfaces
Introduction
Interest in dynamic wetting processes has immensely increased during the past 10 years [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. In many industrial and medical applications, some strategies to control drop spreading on solid surfaces are being developed. One possibility is that a surfactant is added to a liquid [3], [8], [9].
On the other hand, there are very few systematic investigations of quantitative relations between the chemical structure of surfactants and the spreading behavior of their aqueous solutions on solid polymer surfaces with different surface energies. Moreover, the main part of them is concerned with highly concentrated surfactant solutions (far above the corresponding critical micelle concentrations) [5], [10], [11], [12]. At the same time, in spite of their practical importance, there is a lack of literature data about the spreading dynamics of relatively dilute aqueous surfactant solutions on polymer surfaces.
The objective of this paper is to present some new results on surfactant solution dynamic behavior observed while measuring the contact angles at different surfactant concentrations both well below and close to the critical micelle concentration (cmc) on different well-prepared and -characterized polymer surfaces. Some problems associated with dynamic contact angle measurements such as evaporation and depletion effects will be also discussed.
Section snippets
Surfactants
The surfactants used in this study were anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), cationic dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB), and nonionic pentaethylene glycol monododecyl ether (C12E5), all with the same alkyl chain length. All surfactants were of high purity grade (⩾98%) from Fluka and were used without further purification. Aqueous solutions of these surfactants with desired concentrations in the cmc range of 0.0625 to 2 cmc were prepared by dilution from the corresponding stock solutions
Dynamic and quasi-equilibrium contact angles: evaporation and depletion effects
As an example, Fig. 1 demonstrates the averaged dynamic contact angle and drop base radius with their standard deviations for C12E5 solution at the cmc (31 mg/l) on the highly hydrophobic Teflon AF surface. As can be seen, the drop base radius regularly increases and then stays nearly constant, whereas the contact angle does not reach its equilibrium value.
In a typical experiment (Fig. 2), the drop volume decreases linearly with time beginning at approximately 5 s. We proceed from the
Summary
The wetting behavior of (relatively) dilute aqueous surfactant solutions over highly hydrophobic and moderately hydrophobic polymer surfaces was characterized by wetting dynamics measurements. In order to analyze the equilibrium state, an algorithm to correct the contact angle taking evaporation into account is presented.
Considering the dynamic wetting behavior, it was found that ionic surfactant solutions such as SDS and DTAB do not spread on low energy surfaces (⩽23 mJ/m2) at any
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by Sasol Germany GmbH. Two of the authors (K.S. and V.R.) acknowledge the Saxon Ministry of Science and Art (SMWK, Germany) for financial support. We are grateful to Zoltán Mészáros from Repallon GmbH (Switzerland) for giving much useful advice on the wetting measurements using the FibroDAT tester, as well as to Nicole Petong and to Mikhail Motornov, both from the Institute of Polymer Research Dresden, for performing the AFM experiments and ellipsometric measurements,
References (19)
- et al.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(2001) J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1989)- et al.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1996) - et al.
Colloids Surf. A
(2001) - et al.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1997) - et al.
Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1999) - et al.
Colloids Surf.
(1996) - et al.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(2000) - et al.
Langmuir
(1997)
Cited by (89)
Surface wetting kinetics of water soluble organic film
2023, Progress in Organic CoatingsOn the determination of critical micelle concentration of partially dissociated ionic surfactants using contact angle data
2022, Journal of Molecular LiquidsInkjet printing of surfactant solutions onto thin moving porous media
2022, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering AspectsTreatment of surfactants with concentrations below critical micelle concentration by ultrafiltration: A mini-review
2022, Water CycleCitation Excerpt :The relative balance among these interactions determines the surfactant orientations on the membrane top layer. Adsorption experiments can determine the orientation of the adsorbed surfactants by examining changes in hydrophobicity at the membrane surface [49]. For hydrophobic membranes, the orientation of the adsorbed molecule will likely be towards the hydrophobic group that is close to the surface and the hydrophilic group directed towards the aqueous phase.
Apple leaf wettability variability as a function of genotype and apple scab susceptibility
2020, Scientia HorticulturaeComparing electrowettability and surfactants as tools for wettability enhancement on a hydrophobic surface
2020, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering AspectsCitation Excerpt :The advancing contact angle was recorded using a goniometer (Biolin Scientific Theta) after 2 min, allowing droplets to spread (droplets spread by an additional 1–5° after the post-deposition spreading). Beyond this time, the CA of the droplet did not change as observed by other researchers [34]. A DC EW field was applied with the voltage increasing at 2–4 Volts/sec.