Modeling grain boundaries using a phase-field technique

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(99)00856-8Get rights and content

Abstract

We propose a two-dimensional phase-field model of grain boundary dynamics. One-dimensional analytical solutions for a stable grain boundary in a bicrystal are obtained, and equilibrium energies are computed. By comparison with microscopic models of dislocation walls, insights into the physical accuracy of this model can be obtained. Indeed, for a particular choice of functional dependencies in the model, the grain boundary energy takes the same analytic form as the microscopic (dislocation) model of Read and Shockley (Phys. Rev. 78 (1950) 275).

Introduction

Previously, we presented a new model [1], [2] and phase-field simulations of the simultaneous processes of solidification, impingement, and coarsening of arbitrarily oriented crystals. In earlier models of this phenomenon, a finite number of crystalline orientations are allowed with respect to the fixed coordinate reference frame. Morin et al. [3], and Lusk [4] constructed a free energy density having N minima by introducing a rotational (orientation) variable in the homogeneous free energy. Chen and Yang [5] and Steinbach et al. [6] assigned N-order parameters to the N allowed orientations. In these approaches, the free energy density depends on the orientation of the crystal measured in the fixed frame — a property which is not physical.

In Refs. [1], [2] the model introduced was invariant under rotations of the reference frame. A similarly motivated approach has also been developed by Lusk [7]. Herein, we present a completely general formulation of a new class of models which allow for accurate, physical modeling of grain boundary dynamics, with particular attention paid to low-angle boundaries.

Section snippets

Development of the model

We focus on a completely solid two-dimensional system with grain boundaries present. The model parameters η and θ represent a coarse-grained measure of the degree of crystalline order and the crystalline orientation, respectively. We restrict 0⩽η⩽1 and −π⩽θ⩽π. The variable θ is an indicator of the mean orientation of the crystalline subregion (in 2D). Note, that when symmetrically equivalent crystalline directions exist, θ may not be uniquely defined. However, the point group symmetry

Comparisons with dislocation models of grain boundaries

The energies of low-misorientation tilt grain boundaries have been approximated by summing the energy of distribution of edge dislocations [10]. Here, we discuss a method for reproducing the same energetic dependence on misorientation. Using the above results we may compute the free interface energy of a bicrystal grain boundary to beγ=sχ(η0)Δθ+2α∫1η02f(η)dη.If we choose f=a2(1−η)2/2 (a very plausible choice), and a somewhat unusual choice for χ ofχ(η)=−2ln(1−η),then we findγ=sΔθ1−lnsΔθαaholds.

References (11)

  • R. Kobayashi et al.

    Physica D

    (1998)
  • J.A. Warren et al.

    Physica A

    (1998)
  • I. Steinbach et al.

    Physica D

    (1996)
  • B. Morin et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1995)
  • M.T. Lusk,...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (51)

  • Phase-field model for anisotropic grain growth

    2022, Acta Materialia
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, the MPF models require a large number of order parameters and their naive implementations are expensive to compute, although methods exist for optimizing the number of order parameters which must be tracked during the calculation [15,31–35]. An alternative phase-field approach for grain growth is the orientation-field model, that uses a single phase-field variable coupled to an orientation-field variable representing the local crystal orientation with respect to a reference frame [36–39]. Since the orientation-field models only consist of two phase-field equations for the entire system, these models avoid the intricacies of tracking multiple order parameters and do not scale in computational cost with the number of orientations represented.

  • S-PFM model for ideal grain growth

    2020, Acta Materialia
    Citation Excerpt :

    Mesoscopic models have been developed to study grain growth and recrystallization, such as kinetic Potts models [4,5], cellular automaton [6,7], front tracking and vertex models [8–10]. More recently, phase-field models have been extended to the description of grain growth and recrystallization [11–14]. The key point of the phase-field approach is that interfaces are implicitly described by continuous fields that take constant values in the grains and vary continuously but steeply across a diffuse front.

  • Quantitative 3D phase field modelling of solidification using next-generation adaptive mesh refinement

    2018, Computational Materials Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Dynamics then follow from dissipative gradient flow minimization of the free energy functional. The method has evolved past its theoretical origins, being used to describe various microstructure evolution phenomena such as solidification of multiple crystal orientations [12–14], solidification of multiple components and phases [15–17], defect-solute interactions [18], elasticity [19,20] and plasticity [21]. Since the introduction of the phase field technique to mainstream materials science around the early 1990s, the complexity of alloy systems modelled using phase field models has progressively increased.

  • Micro structures in the grain evolution during solidification of silicon: Phase field calculations

    2017, Acta Materialia
    Citation Excerpt :

    Lin & Lan used a three-dimensional model, still with simplified anisotropy function and growth kinetics [7]. So far, all phase field calculations were based on the model of Warren et al. for computing the grain growth [8,9]. Also in this paper we use such a model and discuss in the end the limitations of this approach concerning the grain boundary orientation.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text