Modeling grain boundaries using a phase-field technique
Introduction
Previously, we presented a new model [1], [2] and phase-field simulations of the simultaneous processes of solidification, impingement, and coarsening of arbitrarily oriented crystals. In earlier models of this phenomenon, a finite number of crystalline orientations are allowed with respect to the fixed coordinate reference frame. Morin et al. [3], and Lusk [4] constructed a free energy density having N minima by introducing a rotational (orientation) variable in the homogeneous free energy. Chen and Yang [5] and Steinbach et al. [6] assigned N-order parameters to the N allowed orientations. In these approaches, the free energy density depends on the orientation of the crystal measured in the fixed frame — a property which is not physical.
In Refs. [1], [2] the model introduced was invariant under rotations of the reference frame. A similarly motivated approach has also been developed by Lusk [7]. Herein, we present a completely general formulation of a new class of models which allow for accurate, physical modeling of grain boundary dynamics, with particular attention paid to low-angle boundaries.
Section snippets
Development of the model
We focus on a completely solid two-dimensional system with grain boundaries present. The model parameters η and θ represent a coarse-grained measure of the degree of crystalline order and the crystalline orientation, respectively. We restrict 0⩽η⩽1 and −π⩽θ⩽π. The variable θ is an indicator of the mean orientation of the crystalline subregion (in 2D). Note, that when symmetrically equivalent crystalline directions exist, θ may not be uniquely defined. However, the point group symmetry
Comparisons with dislocation models of grain boundaries
The energies of low-misorientation tilt grain boundaries have been approximated by summing the energy of distribution of edge dislocations [10]. Here, we discuss a method for reproducing the same energetic dependence on misorientation. Using the above results we may compute the free interface energy of a bicrystal grain boundary to beIf we choose f=a2(1−η)2/2 (a very plausible choice), and a somewhat unusual choice for χ ofthen we findholds.
References (11)
- et al.
Physica D
(1998) - et al.
Physica A
(1998) - et al.
Physica D
(1996) - et al.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(1995) - M.T. Lusk,...
Cited by (51)
Phase-field model for anisotropic grain growth
2022, Acta MaterialiaCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, the MPF models require a large number of order parameters and their naive implementations are expensive to compute, although methods exist for optimizing the number of order parameters which must be tracked during the calculation [15,31–35]. An alternative phase-field approach for grain growth is the orientation-field model, that uses a single phase-field variable coupled to an orientation-field variable representing the local crystal orientation with respect to a reference frame [36–39]. Since the orientation-field models only consist of two phase-field equations for the entire system, these models avoid the intricacies of tracking multiple order parameters and do not scale in computational cost with the number of orientations represented.
S-PFM model for ideal grain growth
2020, Acta MaterialiaCitation Excerpt :Mesoscopic models have been developed to study grain growth and recrystallization, such as kinetic Potts models [4,5], cellular automaton [6,7], front tracking and vertex models [8–10]. More recently, phase-field models have been extended to the description of grain growth and recrystallization [11–14]. The key point of the phase-field approach is that interfaces are implicitly described by continuous fields that take constant values in the grains and vary continuously but steeply across a diffuse front.
Quantitative 3D phase field modelling of solidification using next-generation adaptive mesh refinement
2018, Computational Materials ScienceCitation Excerpt :Dynamics then follow from dissipative gradient flow minimization of the free energy functional. The method has evolved past its theoretical origins, being used to describe various microstructure evolution phenomena such as solidification of multiple crystal orientations [12–14], solidification of multiple components and phases [15–17], defect-solute interactions [18], elasticity [19,20] and plasticity [21]. Since the introduction of the phase field technique to mainstream materials science around the early 1990s, the complexity of alloy systems modelled using phase field models has progressively increased.
Micro structures in the grain evolution during solidification of silicon: Phase field calculations
2017, Acta MaterialiaCitation Excerpt :Lin & Lan used a three-dimensional model, still with simplified anisotropy function and growth kinetics [7]. So far, all phase field calculations were based on the model of Warren et al. for computing the grain growth [8,9]. Also in this paper we use such a model and discuss in the end the limitations of this approach concerning the grain boundary orientation.
Solidification of multicrystalline silicon - Simulation of micro-structures
2014, Journal of Crystal Growth