Kriging in estuaries: as the crow flies, or as the fish swims?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00006-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Geostatistical methods are becoming an essential tool for understanding the spatial distribution of biological and chemical species in estuaries. At the heart of these methods are the spatial prediction/mapping methods known as “kriging”; these can construct statistically optimal predictions for data at unobserved locations using a relatively small, spatially explicit sample. The prediction at any given location is a weighted average of the sample values, where the weights depend on the distances between the sample sites and the target location. For most geostatistical settings, distances are computed “as the crow flies”, i.e. Euclidean distance. For measurements made in estuarine streams, however, intuition suggests that distances between sites should be measured “as the fish swims”, i.e. the length of the shortest in-water path between two sites. Our study evaluated the relative accuracy of eight kriging methods for predicting contaminant and water quality variables measured in an urbanized estuary in South Carolina. The eight methods were defined by all combinations of three factors, each at two levels: (a) Distance metric (Euclidean vs. in-water); (b) semivariogram type (spherical vs. linear) and (c) model trend component (distance to the inlet mouth; without vs. with). For four of the eight variables studied, the in-water distances provided prediction accuracy improvement on the order of 10–30% of prediction error variance. In two of these cases, the improvement only occurred when in-water distances were used together with a model trend component. Choice of semivariogram did not have much effect on prediction accuracy. Although the overall improvement in prediction accuracy was unpredictable and modest, considering the additional difficulties associated with in-water distances, the results suggest that the integration of Geographic Information System (GIS)-based network analysis with kriging using in-water distances merits further research.

References (27)

  • P.A. Burrough

    Spatial aspects of ecological data

  • N. Cressie

    Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares

    J. Int. Assoc. Math. Geol.

    (1985)
  • N. Cressie
  • N. Cressie et al.

    On the stability of the geostatistical method

    Math. Geol.

    (1992)
  • R.E. Dunlap et al.

    Use of geographic information processing for the identification of ‘indirect’ impacts associated with regulatory permitting programs: For now, a conceptual model

  • K.D. Haddad et al.

    A Florida GIS for estuarine management

  • K.D. Haddad et al.

    The role of Geographic Information Systems in managing Florida's coastal wetland resource

  • K.D. Haddad et al.

    Basin-wide management: A remote sensing/GIS approach

  • K.D. Haddad et al.

    Design and implementation of a coastal resource Geographic Information System: administrative considerations

  • C.T. Hunsaker et al.

    Spatial models of ecological systems and processes: the role of GIS

  • W.H. Jefferson et al.

    Developing GIS data layers for estuarine resource management

  • A.G. Journel et al.
  • Cited by (71)

    • A process convolution model for crash count data on a network

      2022, Accident Analysis and Prevention
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, these distances were directly used in Kriging to perform prediction at unsampled locations, which can result in invalid covariance functions. Euclidean distance was also replaced by shortest-path distance in Little et al. (1997), Rathbun (1998), and Jensen et al. (2006) which can also lead to invalid models. This issue has been discussed in detail by Curriero (2006) and Ver Hoef (2018).

    • Estimating abundance indices of juvenile fish in estuaries using Geostatistics: An example of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)

      2022, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Numerous studies have indeed reported fish movements and variations of their habitat distribution in relation to tidal cycles, particularly for pelagic juveniles (Laffaille et al., 2001; Alp and Pichon, 2020; Martinho et al., 2008). Moreover most estuaries are also irregularly-shaped non-convex domains, and the use of euclidean distance may not be appropriate for the analysis of their spatial structures’ dependence (Rathbun, 1998; Little et al., 1997). The observation of spatial auto-correlation in estuarine domains yields therefore to several challenges and it is crucial to understand the physical nature of estuaries, and the environmental preferendum of the studied juvenile fishes to produce relevant abundance indices (Walmsley et al., 2018).

    • Introducing a Kriging-based Gaussian Process approach in pedotransfer functions: Evaluation for the prediction of soil water retention with temperate and tropical datasets

      2021, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Kriging is a geostatistical interpolation method, originally developed for improved ore content prediction in mining (Krige, 1951; Matheron, 1963). Nowadays, it is an essential tool for spatial interpolation in domains such as geology, geotechnics (Soulie et al., 1990), precision agriculture (Wollenhaupt et al., 1994), and fisheries (Little et al., 1997). It has become an successful interpolation method for non-spatial variables as well, in particular as a metamodelling tool (Sacks et al., 1989; Simpson et al., 2001; Wang and Shan, 2007; Kleijnen, 2009).

    • Temporal analysis of remotely sensed turbidity in a coastal archipelago

      2016, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
      Citation Excerpt :

      In temporally dynamic and topographically fragmented coastal waters irregular changes hinder the use of temporal gap-filling methods based on temporally adjacent values, as they cannot follow irregular changes over long intervals. Spatial gap-filling such as interpolation techniques, in turn, are limited because of the anisotropic characteristics of coastal waters, due to barriers, currents and tides (Dunn and Ridgway, 2002; Little et al., 1997; Suominen et al., 2010). All the above-mentioned challenges are present in the northern Baltic Sea, where the coasts are in many cases bordered by archipelagos.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text