Elsevier

Journal of Hydrology

Volume 200, Issues 1–4, 15 December 1997, Pages 323-344
Journal of Hydrology

Research paper
Observations of particle movement in a monitoring well using the colloidal borescope

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00026-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The colloidal borescope consists of a set of lenses and miniature video cameras capable of observing natural particles in monitoring wells. Based on field observations of these particles, it appears possible to measure in situ groundwater velocity in a well bore. Field observations have shown that directional measurements using the colloidal borescope are generally in good agreement with expected flow directions. However, the magnitude of flow velocity is higher compared with values based on conventional test methods. High relative flow velocities, even after correction factors have been applied to compensate for well bore effects, are believed to be due to preferential flow zones in the surrounding aquifer. Low flow zones exhibit swirling multidirectional flow that does not allow for a linear velocity measurement. Consequently, groundwater flow velocities measured by the colloidal borescope in heterogeneous aquifers will be biased toward the maximum velocity values present in the aquifer. A series of laboratory experiments was conducted to assess the reliability of the instrument. Based on this work, a seepage velocity correction factor (α) of 1–4 was found for quantifying groundwater seepage velocity in the adjacent aquifer from observations in a well bore. Laboratory measurements also indicate that preferential flow in the surrounding aquifer dominates flow in the well. Results of this work suggest the possibility of quantifying higher-flow velocities associated with preferential flow zones in the subsurface.

References (18)

  • F.J. Molz et al.

    Borehole flowmeters: field application and data analysis

    J. Hydrol.

    (1994)
  • P. Bidaux et al.

    Fluid flow patterns around a well bore or an underground drift with complex skin effects

    Water Resour. Res.

    (1991)
  • H.S. Carslaw et al.

    Conduction of Heat in Solids

  • W. Drost et al.

    Point dilution methods of investigating ground water flow by means of radioisotopes

    Water Resour. Res.

    (1968)
  • R.C. Earlougher

    Advances in Well Test Analysis

    (1977)
  • G.E. Grisak et al.

    A fluoride borehole dilution apparatus for groundwater velocity measurements

    Can. Geotech J.

    (1977)
  • E. Halevy et al.

    Borehole dilution techniques: a critical review

  • A.E. Hess

    Identifying hydraulically conductive fractures with a slow-velocity borehole flowmeter

    Can. Geotech. J.

    (1986)
  • P.M. Kearl et al.

    Field comparison of micropurging vs traditional ground water sampling

    Ground Water Monit. Rev. Fall

    (1994)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (46)

  • Individual and joint inversion of head and flux data by geostatistical hydraulic tomography

    2021, Advances in Water Resources
    Citation Excerpt :

    The most popular technique for quantifying groundwater flux in the field was based on dilution tests (Drost et al., 1968; Jamin et al., 2015; Schneider et al., 2019), where the dilution of an injected tracer inside a screened borehole or within packers is used to estimate the horizontal groundwater flux. Other approaches, such as the colloidal borescope (Kearl, 1997), the point velocity probe (Labaky et al., 2007) or the in-situ permeable flow sensor (Ballard et al., 1996), can also measure the horizontal groundwater flux. A comprehensive review of the groundwater velocity measurement approaches is provided by Devlin (2020).

  • An innovative tool for groundwater velocity measurement compared with other tools in laboratory and field tests

    2019, Journal of Hydrology X
    Citation Excerpt :

    The unit is best deployed with velocities greater than 50 cm.day−1. The Colloidal Borescope (Kearl, 1997; Kearl et al., 1999) is a tool employing direct observation of particles in the well screen. These measured velocities are averaged to obtain a mean Darcy flux.

  • An In-Well Point Velocity Probe for the rapid determination of groundwater velocity at the centimeter-scale

    2018, Journal of Hydrology
    Citation Excerpt :

    More recently, other methods of direct groundwater velocity measurement have been developed. Examples of in-well techniques include the point dilution method, the colloidal borescope, the passive flux meter, the heat-pulse flowmeter, and the acoustic Doppler flowmeter (Drost et al., 1968; Hatfield et al., 2004; Kearl, 1997; Kerfoot, 1988; Wilson et al., 2001). In-well techniques can assess spatial variability across a site economically by redeploying probes in multiple wells.

  • A simple reason explains why it is so difficult to assess groundwater ages and contamination ages

    2017, Science of the Total Environment
    Citation Excerpt :

    The first mixing occurs in the borehole wall: a damaged and/or poorly sealed wall creates vertical hydraulic short-circuits between aquifer layers (Chapuis and Sabourin, 1989; Chesnaux et al., 2006) and mixes waters down to the screen where water is sampled. The second mixing takes place within the well screen and filter pack, and its probability increases with the filter pack length (Kearl, 1997; Zinn and Konikow, 2007; Berthold and Börner, 2008; Baudron et al., 2014). This paper does not examine the two man-made processes.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text