Section 4. Ferritic/martensitic steels
Ferritic/martensitic steels – overview of recent results

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(02)01082-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Considerable research work has been conducted on the ferritic/martensitic steels since the last International Conference on Fusion Reactor Materials in 1999. Since only a limited amount of that work can be reviewed in this paper, four areas will be emphasized: (1) the international collaboration under the auspices of the International Energy Agency (IEA) to address potential problems with ferritic/martensitic steels and to prove their feasibility for fusion, (2) the major uncertainty that remains concerning the effect of transmutation helium on mechanical properties of the steels when irradiated in a fusion neutron environment, (3) development of new reduced-activation steels beyond the F82H and JLF-1 steels studied in the IEA collaboration, and (4) work directed at developing oxide dispersion-strengthened steels for operation above 650 °C.

Introduction

Ferritic/martensitic steels were introduced into the fusion materials programs about 25 years ago [1], after research in fast reactor programs demonstrated their superior swelling resistance and excellent thermal properties compared to austenitic stainless steels. The first steels considered were conventional 9% and 12% Cr (all compositions are in wt%) Cr–Mo steels [2]. The development of reduced-activation steels began less than 20 years ago, and these steels are presently considered the primary structural material for a demonstration (DEMO) fusion plant and the first fusion power reactors.

Since the introduction of ferritic/martensitic steels into the fusion program, there have been questions concerning their applicability. An early concern and the reason the steels were not considered sooner involved the uncertainty associated with using a ferromagnetic material in the high magnetic fields in a fusion plant. The ferromagnetic material could cause a field perturbation on the plasma and, in turn, the high magnetic fields of the reactor could cause magnetostatic forces on the ferromagnetic structure. Preliminary calculations indicated that these problems could be handled in the reactor design [3], [4]. Recent more detailed calculations along with continuing experimental work is verifying the earlier conclusions [5], [6], [7], [8].

A second reason for questioning the use of the steels involved the feasibility of using them in the harsh neutron radiation environment of a fusion plant. Neutron irradiation at ≲425 °C hardens the steels, which affects the mechanical properties and fracture behavior. Of special concern is embrittlement and the effect of helium on embrittlement, as manifested in Charpy and fracture mechanics testing by an increase in the ductile-brittle transition temperature (DBTT) and a decrease in the upper-shelf energy (USE). That concern has been the subject of much work, and it is a continuing concern that will be discussed here.

The original objective of this paper was to give an overview of the progress made in the research on the ferritic/martensitic steels for fusion since ICFRM-9 two years ago. However, as the list of papers at ICFRM-10 shows, considerable progress has been made, and it is impossible to discuss all that work in a single paper. Instead, the following topics have been chosen for this discussion: (1) progress made in the international collaboration on the large heats of F82H and JLF-1, (2) helium-effects investigations, (3) the production of the large heat of EUROFER 97 and preliminary experimental results and (4) work on developing new steels to operate above the 550–600 °C limit of the reduced-activation steels.

Section snippets

International collaboration

At an International Energy Agency (IEA) sponsored Workshop for Ferritic/Martensitic Steels for Fusion in Tokyo in 1992, a proposal was made for an international collaboration on determining the feasibility of using ferritic steels for fusion. The Japanese delegation at the meeting proposed to make available large heats of ferritic/martensitic steels that could be used in a collaboration between Japan, Europe, and the United States. In subsequent IEA meetings, a modified F82H composition was

Helium effects

The effect of the transmutation helium generated in the structural material of a fusion reactor first wall on the mechanical properties – especially the fracture properties – has been a constant source of uncertainty that makes the need for a 14 MeV neutron source urgent for materials studies. In the absence of such a source, simulation experiments using ion implantation or 54Fe-, Ni-, or B-doping are the primary techniques used to study helium effects on mechanical properties during neutron

Steel development

Reduced-activation steel development began with small experimental heats to determine compositions with mechanical properties as good or better than the Cr–Mo steels they were to replace. Once that was achieved, the large heats of F82H-IEA and JLF-1 were used to establish the feasibility using of the steels for fusion. The next step was to use what was learned to produce an advanced steel, and the European fusion materials program has taken that step and produced a 3.5-ton heat of a steel

Development of advanced ferritic/martensitic steels

An interesting observation on the tensile behavior of EUROFER is the higher strength of the MANET II (Fig. 3), a nominal Fe–10Cr–0.6Mo–0.7Ni–0.2V–0.15Nb–0.1C steel. One of the objectives in developing the reduced-activation steels was to produce steels with properties similar to the conventional Cr–Mo steels they were to replace. If the results in Fig. 3 are representative, this was not achieved for the F82H and EUROFER 97 with respect to MANET II, indicating that there is still room for

Oxide dispersion-strengthened steels

One attractive route to materials capable of higher operating temperatures and that maintain the advantages of the ferritic/martensitic steels would be the development of oxide dispersion-strengthened (ODS) steels. That option is being pursued in Europe, Japan, and the United States. Development of ODS steels for fast reactor cladding began in Belgium in the late 1960s, and work for that application has continued [41], [42]. The main problem that kept them from being used was the anisotropy in

Summary

Ferritic/martensitic steels are at present the leading candidates for a DEMO or fusion power plant. An international collaboration to determine the feasibility of using the steels for this application has produced a broad range of mechanical and physical property measurements on large heats of reduced-activation steels in the unirradiated and irradiated condition. Uncertainty still exists on the effect of transmutation helium on irradiated properties, a problem that is difficult to address in

Acknowledgments

Research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is sponsored by the Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, US Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with U.T.-Battelle, LLC.

References (54)

  • S.N. Rosenwasser et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1979)
  • M. Sato et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1998)
  • T. Nakayama et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1999)
  • R.L. Klueh et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2000)
  • R. Lindau et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1999)
  • R.L. Klueh et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1992)
  • K. Shiba

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2000)
  • E. Wakai et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2000)
  • Y. Miwa et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2000)
  • T. Morimura et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1996)
  • D.S. Gelles et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1997)
  • R. Kasada et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1998)
  • P.J. Maziasz et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1986)
  • L.R. Greenwood et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2000)
  • R. Kasada et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2001)
  • K.K. Bae et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1992)
  • B. van der Schaaf et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2000)
  • A. Kohyama et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1996)
  • D.K. Mukhopadhyay et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1998)
  • I.-S. Kim et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2000)
  • D.J. Larson et al.

    Scrip. Mater.

    (2001)
  • D.R. Harries
  • H. Attaya et al.
  • T. Lechtenberg et al.
  • T. Takagi et al.

    IEEE Trans. Magn.

    (1996)
  • L.V. Boccaccini et al.

    Fusion Technol.

    (1997)
  • S. Jitsukawa, M. Tamura, B. van der Schaaf, R.L. Klueh, A. Alamo, C. Petersen, M. Schirra, G.R. Odette, F. Tavassoli,...
  • Cited by (319)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text