A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age*
A classification of newborn infants based upon gestational age and birth weight is proposed. The advantages of establishing such a routine on a nursery service, and the possibility of superimposing neonatal mortality rates upon gestational-age and birth-weight data are presented.
References (6)
- GruenwaldP.
Growth of the human fetus: I. Normal growth and its variation
Am. J. Obst. & Gynec.
(1966) - van den BergB.J. et al.
The relationship of the rate of intrauterine growth of infants of low birth weight to mortality, morbidity, and congenital anomalies
J. Pediat.
(1966) - LubchencoL.O. et al.
Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation
Pediatrics
(1963)
Cited by (955)
Postneonatal mortality of severely small for gestational age extremely low birth weight infants
2024, Pediatrics and NeonatologyInfants born with weights below the 10th percentile of the expected birth weight for gestational age, defined as small for gestational age (SGA), have an increased risk of neonatal mortality and prematurity-related complications. However, the relationship between SGA and postneonatal (28 days to <1 year) mortality among extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWIs) remains uncertain. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the association between birth weight percentiles and postneonatal mortality in ELBWIs.
A cohort of ELBWIs with a gestational age greater than 23 weeks who were admitted to Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital between 2008 and 2019 were considered eligible. Infants with major congenital anomalies, those large for their gestational age, or those who died within 28 days of birth were excluded. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of the three groups of ELBWIs–severe SGA (sSGA; birth weight, <3rd percentile), moderate SGA (mSGA; birth weight, 3rd to <10th percentile), and appropriate for gestational age (AGA; birth weight, 10th to <90th percentile)–were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify perinatal factors associated with postneonatal mortality in sSGA infants.
sSGA ELBWIs demonstrated higher incidence of meconium obstruction (25% vs. 8.3% vs. 7.6%, P < 0.001), cholestasis (21% vs. 4.2% vs. 9.7%, P < 0.003), and postneonatal mortality (7.3% vs. 0% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.004) than mSGA and AGA ELBWIs. In the logistic regression analysis, cholestasis (odds ratio, 30.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.98–304) and sepsis (odds ratio, 13.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–173) were significantly related to postneonatal mortality among ELBWIs with sSGA. The leading cause of postneonatal mortality in sSGA ELBWIs was liver failure (55.5%).
sSGA ELBWIs exhibited a higher rate of postneonatal mortality compared to mSGA and AGA ELBWIs. Therefore, strategies aimed at preventing liver dysfunction in severely cholestatic ELBWIs with sSGA are necessary.
Overview of the Global and US Burden of Preterm Birth
2024, Clinics in PerinatologyComparing population–based fetal growth standards in a US cohort
2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyNo fetal growth standard is currently endorsed for universal use in the United States. Newer standards improve upon the methodologic limitations of older studies; however, before adopting into practice, it is important to know how recent standards perform at identifying fetal undergrowth or overgrowth and at predicting subsequent neonatal morbidity or mortality in US populations.
To compare classification of estimated fetal weight that is <5th or 10th percentile or >90th percentile by 6 population-based fetal growth standards and the ability of these standards to predict a composite of neonatal morbidity and mortality.
We used data from the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be cohort, which recruited nulliparous women in the first trimester at 8 US clinical centers (2010–2014). Estimated fetal weight was obtained from ultrasounds at 16 to 21 and 22 to 29 weeks of gestation (N=9534 women). We calculated rates of fetal growth restriction (estimated fetal weight <5th and 10th percentiles; fetal growth restriction<5 and fetal growth restriction<10) and estimated fetal weight >90th percentile (estimated fetal weight>90) from 3 large prospective fetal growth cohorts with similar rigorous methodologies: INTERGROWTH-21, World Health Organization-sex-specific and combined, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development race-ethnic-specific and unified, and the historic Hadlock reference. To determine whether differential classification of fetal growth restriction or estimated fetal weight >90 among standards was clinically meaningful, we then compared area under the curve and sensitivity of each standard to predict small for gestational age or large for gestational age at birth, composite perinatal morbidity and mortality alone, and small for gestational age or large for gestational age with composite perinatal morbidity and mortality.
The standards classified different proportions of fetal growth restriction and estimated fetal weight>90 for ultrasounds at 16 to 21 (visit 2) and 22 to 29 (visit 3) weeks of gestation. At visit 2, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development race-ethnic-specific, World Health Organization sex-specific and World Health Organization-combined identified similar rates of fetal growth restriction<10 (8.4%–8.5%) with the other 2 having lower rates, whereas Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development race-ethnic-specific identified the highest rate of fetal growth restriction<5 (5.0%) compared with the other references. At visit 3, World Health Organization sex-specific classified 9.2% of fetuses as fetal growth restriction<10, whereas the other 5 classified a lower proportion as follows: World Health Organization-combined (8.4%), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development race-ethnic-specific (7.7%), INTERGROWTH (6.2%), Hadlock (6.1%), and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development unified (5.1%). INTERGROWTH classified the highest (21.3%) as estimated fetal weight>90 whereas Hadlock classified the lowest (8.3%). When predicting composite perinatal morbidity and mortality in the setting of early-onset fetal growth restriction, World Health Organization had the highest area under the curve of 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.51–0.53) for fetal growth restriction<10 at 22 to 29 weeks of gestation, but the areas under the curve were similar among standards (0.52). Sensitivity was generally low across standards (22.7%–29.1%). When predicting small for gestational age birthweight with composite neonatal morbidity or mortality, for fetal growth restriction<10 at 22 to 29 weeks of gestation, World Health Organization sex-specific had the highest area under the curve (0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–0.67) and INTERGROWTH had the lowest (area under the curve=0.58; 95% confidence interval 0.55–0.62), though all standards had low sensitivity (7.0%–9.6%).
Despite classifying different proportions of fetuses as fetal growth restriction or estimated fetal weight>90, all standards performed similarly in predicting perinatal morbidity and mortality. Classification of different percentages of fetuses as fetal growth restriction or estimated fetal weight>90 among references may have clinical implications in the management of pregnancies, such as increased antenatal monitoring for fetal growth restriction or cesarean delivery for suspected large for gestational age. Our findings highlight the importance of knowing how standards perform in local populations, but more research is needed to determine if any standard performs better at identifying the risk of morbidity or mortality.
Performance of fetal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in predicting birthweight according to the test-to-delivery interval: A cohort study
2024, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyTo assess the influence of the test-to-delivery interval (TDI) on the performance of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting birthweight (BW).
This is a secondary analysis of a prospective, single center, blinded cohort study that compared MRI and US for the prediction of BW ≥ 95th percentile in singleton pregnancies. Patients that were included in the initial study underwent US and MRI for estimation of fetal weight between 36 + 0/7 and 36 + 6/7 weeks of gestation (WG). The primary outcome of the current study was to report the changes of US and MRI sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of BW > 95th percentile, BW > 90th percentile, BW < 10th percentile, and BW < 5th percentile, according to the TDI. The secondary outcome was to represent the performance of both tools in the prediction of BW > 90th percentile when TDI is<2 weeks, between 2 and 4 weeks, and>4 weeks. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed accordingly.
2378 patients were eligible for final analysis. For the prediction of BW > 95th or 90th percentile, the sensitivity of MRI remains high until 2 weeks, and it decreases slowly between 2 and 4 weeks, in contrast to the sensitivity of US which decreases rapidly 2 weeks after examination (p < 0.001). For the prediction of BW < 10th or 5th percentile, the sensitivity of both tools decreases in parallel between 1 and 2 weeks. The specificities of both tools remain high from examination till delivery. These findings are reproducible with the use of the antenatal customized and the postnatal national growth charts.
The performance of MRI in the prediction of BW, especially in large-for-gestational age, is maximal when delivery occurs within two weeks of the examination, decreasing slightly thereafter, in contrast with the performance of US which decreases drastically over time.
Small fetal thymus and adverse perinatal outcome in maternal vasculitis: A prospective case-control study
2023, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human ReproductionUltrasonographic evaluation of fetal thymus size may be used to predict the adverse perinatal outcome in pregnant women with vasculitis.
To compare fetal thymus size in pregnant women with vasculitis and healthy pregnant women and to evaluate whether fetal thymus size predicts the adverse perinatal outcome.
Twenty-two pregnant women with previously diagnosed vasculitis, 18 of them with Behçet's disease, three with Takayasu arteritis, and one with Wegener's granulomatosis, were included in the case group. The control group comprised 66 healthy pregnant women whose gestational ages matched the case group. Thymic thoracic ratio (TTR) was measured to assess fetal thymus size in the view of three vessels and trachea.
In the case group, fetal TTR was significantly lower (0.32 ± 0.03 vs. 0.36 ± 0.02, p = < 0.001). Fetal TTR was significantly lower in those using prednisone than those not (p = .001) in the case group. There was no significant difference in fetal TTR between colchicine used and not used (p = .078) in the case group. Also, for the TTR, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 92% were achieved with a cut-off value of 0.33 for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes.
The fetuses of pregnant women with maternal vasculitis had a smaller TTR. The small fetal thymus may alert clinicians to possible adverse perinatal outcomes and, with other supporting risk factors, may help predict adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with vasculitis.
The impact of different growth charts on birthweight prediction: obstetrical ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging
2023, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFMThe estimation of fetal weight by fetal magnetic resonance imaging is a simple and rapid method with a high sensitivity in predicting birthweight in comparison with ultrasound. Several national and international growth charts are currently in use, but there is substantial heterogeneity among these charts due to variations in the selected populations from which they were derived, in methodologies, and in statistical analysis of data.
This study aimed to compare the performance of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for the prediction of birthweight using 3 commonly used fetal growth charts: the INTERGROWTH-21st Project, World Health Organization, and Fetal Medicine Foundation charts.
Data derived from a prospective, single-center, blinded cohort study that compared the performance of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound between 36+0/7 and 36+6/7 weeks of gestation for the prediction of birthweight ≥95th percentile were reanalyzed. Estimated fetal weight was categorized as above or below the 5th, 10th, 90th, and 95th percentile according to the 3 growth charts. Birthweight was similarly categorized according to the birthweight standards of each chart. The performances of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of birthweight <5th, <10th, >90th, and >95th percentile using the different growth charts were compared. Data were analyzed with R software, version 4.1.2. The comparison of sensitivity and specificity was done using McNemar and exact binomial tests. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
A total of 2378 women were eligible for final analysis. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging were performed at a median gestational age of 36+3/7 weeks, delivery occurred at a median gestational age of 39+3/7 weeks, and median birthweight was 3380 g. The incidences of birthweight <5th and <10th percentiles were highest with the Fetal Medicine Foundation chart and lowest with the INTERGROWTH-21st chart, whereas the incidences of birthweight >90th and >95th percentiles were lowest with the Fetal Medicine Foundation chart and highest with the INTERGROWTH-21st chart. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging with an estimated fetal weight >95th percentile in the prediction of birthweight >95th percentile was significantly higher than that of ultrasound across the 3 growth charts; however, its specificity was slightly lower than that of ultrasound. In contrast, the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging with an estimated fetal weight <10th percentile for predicting birthweight <10th percentile was significantly lower than that of ultrasound in the INTERGROWTH-21st and Fetal Medicine Foundation charts, whereas the specificity and positive predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging were significantly higher than those of ultrasound for all 3 charts. Findings for the prediction of birthweight >90th percentile were close to those of birthweight >95th percentile, and findings for the prediction of birthweight <5th percentile were close to those of birthweight <10th percentile.
The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging is superior to that of ultrasound for the prediction of large for gestational age fetuses and inferior to that of ultrasound for the prediction of small for gestational age fetuses across the 3 different growth charts. The reverse is true for the specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with that of ultrasound.
- *
Supported by Public Health Service Grants HD00781-03 and HD00373 and the Children's Bureau in cooperation with the Colorado State Department of Public Health and the University of Colorado Medical Center.
- 1
Present Address, University of Colorado Medical Center, 4200 East 9th Ave. Denver, Colo., 80220.