Modification of an oceanic plateau, Aruba, Dutch Caribbean: Implications for the generation of continental crust
Introduction
The question of how continental crust was (and is) generated is of fundamental importance to geologists and planetary scientists. Several authors have proposed that the growth of the continental crust may be connected to the presence of mantle plumes and oceanic plateaux (e.g., Stein and Hofmann, 1994; Abbott and Mooney, 1995; Stein and Goldstein, 1996), although the nature of this link is not well-constrained and many questions remain unanswered. Growth of the continental crust can arise directly from a plume ascending beneath continental lithosphere, particularly if accompanied by rifting (e.g., White et al., 1987); additionally, plumes which rise beneath oceanic lithosphere can result in the formation of thick oceanic plateaux, which because of their buoyancy may resist subduction (Saunders et al., 1996), becoming accreted to the edges of continents. A major difficulty is unequivocally identifying examples of oceanic plateaux in the ancient geological record. Modern plateaux are recognised by their crustal thickness, composition, and sedimentary record (e.g., Coffin and Eldholm, 1994), but even when all these criteria are used to evaluate an environment of formation, the interpretation is rarely irrefutable. The disparity between the abundance of oceanic plateaux in the modern oceans and their relative paucity in the continental geological record suggests that, if the rate of production of plateaux has not been anomalously high in the last 150 m.y., either plateaux are eventually subducted, or they are processed and converted into material which is no longer easily recognisable as oceanic plateau crust (Stein and Goldstein, 1996; Saunders et al., 1996).
Several important comparisons can be made between the two generally accepted models of continental growth: volcanic arc accretion and oceanic plateau accretion. Firstly, oceanic plateaux represent enormous volumes of material (Schubert and Sandwell, 1989). The crust of the Ontong Java plateau (OJP), for example, occupies a volume of 44 to 56 million km3 (Gladczenko et al., 1997), which could potentially be accreted to make continental lithosphere. The oceanic plateau model may therefore be able to explain periods of rapid continental growth better than the volcanic arc accretion model; additionally, as evidence mounts for episodic crustal growth (e.g., McCulloch and Bennett, 1994), it has been suggested that the sporadic nature of mantle plume activity and oceanic plateau magmatism is responsible for this episodicity (e.g., Condie, 1997). Secondly, neither oceanic plateau nor oceanic arc accretion can, on their own, explain the geochemical characteristics of the bulk continental crust, because both are too mafic in composition (Tarney and Windley, 1977). Differentiation and modification of primitive mantle-derived arcs or plateaux must therefore be an important process in creating the enrichment of silica and various incompatible trace elements observed in continental crust. We need to know how these enrichment processes operate, and on what timescale. Finally, it must be stressed that there are unambiguous examples of accretion of both oceanic plateaux (e.g., the Caribbean plateau in Colombia: Millward et al., 1984; Kerr et al., 1997a) and oceanic arcs (Soja, 1996) to pre-existing continents. Accordingly, our task should now be to constrain the means by which conversion of oceanic plateau or arc into continental crust occurs, by considering both modern and ancient examples.
Some fragments of oceanic plateau crust have been identified as accreted members of greenstone belts (e.g., Kusky and Kidd, 1992; Desrochers et al., 1993), although other greenstone belts are interpreted as accreted volcanic arc terranes (e.g., the Slave Province, Canada: Kusky, 1989; Davis and Hegner, 1992) or autochthonous eruptive sequences (Bickle et al., 1994). In spite of this dissent, however, it seems that studies of Phanerozoic oceanic plateaux and their subsequent histories may provide useful constraints on Archaean processes.
The island of Aruba, located in the complex southern plate boundary zone of the Caribbean region, may provide the answers to some of these controversies. Here, a predominantly tonalitic batholith dated as ∼85–82 Ma intrudes a sequence of mafic lavas, volcaniclastic sediments and intrusive rocks belonging to the predominantly 88 to 91 Ma Caribbean–Colombian Cretaceous Igneous Province (CCCIP; Fig. 1) (Kerr et al., 1997b; Sinton et al., 1998). The association of mafic rocks that are thought to be plume-related members of the CCCIP and tonalites that share some characteristics with Archaean tonalites means that Aruba is an ideal place to study the relationships between initial material extracted from the mantle and the silicic material intimately associated with it in both space and time. The swift transmutation in magmatic environment observed on Aruba suggests that conversion of plateau material into continental crust may begin at a much earlier stage than has been previously suspected (e.g., Stein and Goldstein, 1996).
Section snippets
Characteristics of modern oceanic plateaux
The region covered by the Caribbean Sea is the site of an oceanic large igneous province (LIP) of late Cretaceous age (Donnelly et al., 1990). LIPs may be divided into two categories: continental flood basalts and oceanic plateaux. Continental flood basalt provinces clearly have a better preservation potential in the geological record, and will not be considered further here, but the fate of oceanic plateaux is much less certain.
The formation of oceanic plateaux can be extremely rapid, with
Field observations and interpretations
The rocks of the Aruba Lava Formation (ALF) cover an area of approximately 20 km2 in central Aruba (Fig. 3). The ALF comprises a sequence of basaltic lavas interbedded with volcaniclastic rocks, and intruded by dolerites. The main lithological observations are summarised in Table 1. According to Monen (1977), the structure of the ALF consists of, from south to north, a faulted syncline and anticline. The majority of the outcrop area represents the northward-dipping northern limb of the
Field and petrological observations and interpretations
The Aruba batholith has two main outcrops (Fig. 3), totalling 80 km2 in area. Although predominantly tonalitic, the batholith consists of a wide range of lithological types, which coexist on a range of scales, from a few centimetres (Fig. 8a) to hundreds of metres. Field and petrological observations for the batholith are summarised in Table 3. The batholith displays considerably less alteration than the Aruba Lava Formation, although some samples show sericitisation of plagioclase and
Discussion
The association of a sequence of tholeiitic mafic rocks with a predominantly tonalitic batholith raises several important issues: how and why does this association occur? These issues may have relevance to the generation of silicic material (TTGs) associated with Archaean greenstone belts, and the generation of the Earth's earliest continental crust.
We have shown that the Aruba Lava Formation has many geochemical similarities with other members of the Caribbean oceanic plateau, and can
Conclusions
1) The location, stratigraphy and geochemistry of the Aruba Lava Formation are all consistent with it being part of the Caribbean oceanic plateau, formed above a mantle plume at 88–91 Ma.
2) The composite gabbroic–dioritic–tonalitic batholith of Aruba represents a single magmatic event at ∼85–82 Ma. Members of the batholith are closely related to one another, forming a continuum of compositions with similar isotopic signatures and incompatible trace element ratios. Field and petrographic
Acknowledgements
Studies in the Caribbean are supported by NERC (UK) studentship GT4/95/157E to RVW and grants GR9/583A and GR3/8984 to JT/ADS; ACK is supported by a Leverhulme Fellowship. We thank Vivi Ruiz for her support in Aruba, and Dirk Beets for stimulating discussions. Thanks also to Dallas Abbott and Kent Condie for initiating the symposium on plumes and crustal growth at the 1997 GSA Annual Meeting, and Steven Goldstein and Marc Defant for their constructive reviews of this manuscript.
References (93)
- et al.
The structural and geochemical evolution of the continental crust—support for the oceanic plateau model of crustal growth
Rev. Geophys.
(1995) - et al.
Generation of sodium-rich magmas from newly underplated basaltic crust
Nature
(1993) - Barker, F., 1979. Trondhjemites: definition, environment and hypotheses of origin. In: Barker, F. (Ed.), Trondhjemites,...
- et al.
Outline of the Cretaceous and early Tertiary history of Curaçao, Bonaire and Aruba, Eighth Caribbean Geological Conference Guide to the Field Excursions on Curaçao, Bonaire and Aruba
GUA Papers of Geology
(1977) - Beets, D.J., Maresch, W.V., Klaver, G.T., Mottana, A., Bocchio, R., Beunk, F.F., Monen, H.P., 1984. Magmatic rock...
- Beets, D.J., Westermann, J.H., De Buisonjé, P.H., Monen, H.P., Stienstra, P., Klaver, G.T., Ruiz, A.V., Curet, E.A.,...
- et al.
Archaean greenstone belts are not oceanic crust
J. Geol.
(1994) Tectonic evolution of the Caribbean
Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.
(1988)- et al.
Buoyant ocean floor and the origin of the Caribbean
J. Geophys. Res.
(1978) - Burke, K., Cooper, C., Dewey, J.F., Mann, P., Pindell, J.L., 1984. Caribbean tectonics and relative plate motions. In:...