Analysis of the damage zone around the crack tip for two rubber-modified epoxy matrices exhibiting different toughenability
Introduction
Thermosets exhibit high values of stiffness and strength together with good heat and solvent resistance, due to their cross-linked nature. One major drawback is their poor resistance to impact and crack initiation. Improvements in their fracture resistance result from the blend with different types of modifiers that generally form a second dispersed phase. The most frequently used modifiers are liquid rubbers that phase-separate in the course of polymerization leading to a dispersion of rubber particles in the thermoset matrix [1].
One inevitable effect of adding soft rubber particles to a rigid polymer is that its yield stress, σY, is lowered by the stress concentration effect produced by dispersed particles. This effect may be enhanced if a fraction of the added rubber remains dissolved in the matrix, lowering its glass transition temperature, thus producing an extra decrease in σY. Both effects lead to an increase in the critical stress intensity factor, KIC, originated by crack tip blunting. The toughenability of an epoxy matrix may be defined by its ability to promote deformation mechanisms that can increase KIC beyond the expected increase produced by the lower yield stress.
The main toughening mechanism present in rubber-modified epoxies is the cavitation of rubber particles followed by void growth and induced shear yielding of the matrix [2]. Shear bands connecting cavitated rubber particles, called ‘dilatation bands’ or ‘croids’, have been observed [3], [4], [5], [6]. In these bands voids are not interconnected and their free surface is formed within the rubber phase. They propagate by generating peripheral zones of high elastic strain where the matrix becomes strain softened and yields more easily [6]. The eventual strain hardening prevents the occurrence of fracture at relatively early stages of the deformation.
From the description given above, the toughenability of an epoxy matrix might be related to its capacity to exhibit strain softening and large strains at relatively low stress values. The aim of this manuscript is to analyze this relationship for two epoxy systems exhibiting different toughenability: (a) diglycidylether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) cured with piperidine (a classic system for the study of toughening mechanisms), and (b) DGEBA cured with a stoichiometric amount of 4,4′-diamine-3,3′-dimethyldicyclohexylmethane (3DCM) (an epoxy formulation with poor toughenability). Both epoxies were modified with 15 wt% CTBN (carboxyl-terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer), that phase-separated in the course of polymerization.
Toughening mechanisms were analyzed by observing the damage zone around the surviving crack tip produced by the double-notch four-point-bend (DN-4PB) technique [4], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. Both transmission optical microscopy (TOM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used. The mechanical behavior of both unmodified epoxy matrices was analyzed in uniaxial compression. This is a useful test for studying yielding and strain softening since, because the stress is compressive, tensile fracture is suppressed and plastic yielding can be obtained for materials that under other conditions exhibit a brittle behavior.
Section snippets
Materials
Two different epoxy matrices based on diglycidylether of bisphenol A (DGEBA, MY790, Ciba) were investigated. The first one was cured with piperidine (5 g per 100 g of DGEBA), during 16 h at 120 °C. The second one was cured with a stoichiometric amount of 4,4′-diamino-3,3′-dimethyldicyclohexylmethane (3DCM, Laromin C260, BASF), using the following thermal cycle: 1 h at 50 °C, 2 h at 100 °C and 2 h at 150 °C. Fig. 1 shows the chemical structures of the corresponding epoxy networks. The DGEBA-piperidine
Generated morphologies
For both rubber-modified epoxies, phase separation of a rubbery phase was produced in the course of polymerization. Fig. 3(a) and (b) shows TEM micrographs of the generated morphologies. The average size of rubber particles present in the DGEBA-3DCM system (0.17 μm) is lower than the corresponding average size for the DGEBA-piperidine system (0.77 μm). However, in the latter case a bimodal distribution seems to be present, with a large fraction of very small particles.
Thermal and mechanical characterization
Thermal and mechanical
Conclusions
The mere increase of KIC by rubber-modification should not be used, as is frequently found in the literature, as a criterion for assessing its efficiency on the toughening of an epoxy formulation. The stress concentration effect produced by dispersed particles and the decrease in the glass transition temperature produced by the fraction of rubber remaining dissolved in the matrix, lead to a decrease in σY and a corresponding increase in the critical stress intensity factor, KIC, originated by
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Drs Carina Cano and Marı́a J. Yañez for carrying out the electronic microscopy experiments.
References (24)
- et al.
Polymer
(1996) - et al.
Polymer
(2000) - et al.
Polymer
(1992) - et al.
Thermosetting polymers
(2002) - et al.
- et al.
J Mater Sci
(1989) J Mater Sci
(1992)- et al.
J Mater Sci
(1993) - et al.
J Mater Sci
(1989)
Polymer
J Mater Sci
Cited by (91)
Nacre-inspired hierarchical framework enables tough and impact-monitoring epoxy nanocomposites
2024, Composites Part B: EngineeringCrack growth mechanism on SGA adhesive joints
2020, International Journal of Adhesion and AdhesivesIn-situ construction of “octopus”-like nanostructure to achieve high performance epoxy thermosets
2019, Chemical Engineering JournalEpoxy toughening with graphite fluoride: Toward high toughness and strength
2018, PolymerCitation Excerpt :However, it is unavoidable to decrease the strength and modulus of the rigid epoxy and lower the glass transition temperature of the epoxy matrix when adding soft rubber particles [9]. For example, Frontini et al. indicated that adding rubber particles was able to increase the critical stress intensity factor (KIC) attained by crack tip blunting, but decreasing the yield strength through the stress concentration induced by the dispersed particles [9]. For this reason, inorganic fillers such as silica [10,11], carbon nanotube [12,13], clay [14–17], graphene [18–20], and their hybrids, have attracted more and more attention from academic and industry for enhancing both the fracture toughness and the strength of epoxy.
Facile fabrication of durable superhydrophobic silica/epoxy resin coatings with compatible transparency and stability
2018, Surface and Coatings Technology