On the use of continuum mechanics to estimate the properties of nanotubes
Introduction
Recently, experimental methods have allowed for the measurement of the structural motion of nanometer scale objects [1], [2], [3], [4]. In these works the notions of continuum mechanics have been used to infer that carbon nanotubes possess super-high Young's moduli. Other theoretical work using direct atomic simulation [5] has also reached similar conclusions. In [5], for instance, a comparison of bending stiffnesses between a C200 single-wall nanotube and an Iridium beam of “similar dimensions” is presented. The bending stiffness of the carbon nanotubes was determined from a simulation of the atomic structure using the Keating potential; the bending stiffness of the Iridium beam was deduced using the continuum Bernoulli–Euler theory of beam bending. This type of comparison or data interpretation, however, must be done with due regard to the appropriate continuum hypothesis being employed—as has been previously acknowledged [4], [5]. In this paper, we show by using a highly idealized elastic sheet model for a nanotube [2], [6] that the reported super-high Young's moduli are direct consequences of the breakdown of the continuum cross-section hypothesis.
Section snippets
Young's Modulus
The Young's Modulus, E, of a material is defined as the ratio of the normal stress, σ=F/A, to the normal strain, ε=Δ/L, in a 1-dimensional tension test; see Fig. 1(a), where F is the applied force, A is the cross-sectional area of the specimen, Δ is the specimen elongation, and L is the specimen length. Thus,The definition relies on the continuum hypothesis and is designed such that E is truly a material property. In other words, the definition of E is designed so that regardless of
Pure bending
Consider a beam of length L under pure bending (no transverse shear). The beam is made up of n tubular sheets of atoms that are spaced a distance s apart. The thickness of each sheet is t and the distance to the center of sheet j is denoted Rj. Thus the inner radius of the beam is R1−t/2 and the outer radius is Rn+t/2. The mean radius of any sheet can be expressed as Rj=R1+(j−1)(s+t); see Fig. 2. Assume further that L>10Rn so that the Bernoulli–Euler kinematic assumption is valid; i.e. the
Conclusions
In this report, we have derived approximate formulas for the determination of the break down of the continuum cross-section hypothesis. In particular we have shown that for nanobeams in bending, one needs a large number of atomic layers for the validity of the continuum cross-section assumption. Thus the interpretation of experimental data on nanostructures through the reporting of continuum engineering properties needs to be done with careful consideration of the implicit assumptions in
References (6)
- M.M.J. Treacy, T.W. Ebbesen, J.M. Gibson, Nature 381, (1996)...
- B.I. Yakobson, R.E. Smalley, Am. Sci. 85 (1997)...
- N.G. Chopra, A. Zettl, Phys. Rev. B [submitted]...
Cited by (296)
In-situ assessment of microscale crack tip fields in zirconium
2024, International Journal of Mechanical SciencesMechanical models and numerical simulations in nanomechanics: A review across the scales
2021, Engineering Analysis with Boundary ElementsThe effective tensile and bending stiffness of nanotube fibers
2019, International Journal of Mechanical SciencesA new constitutive theory of nonlocal piezoelectric thermoelasticity based on nonlocal single-phase lag heat conduction and structural transient thermo-electromechanical response of piezoelectric nanorod
2024, Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures