Elsevier

Thin Solid Films

Volume 425, Issues 1–2, 3 February 2003, Pages 150-162
Thin Solid Films

A theoretical and numerical study of a thin clamped circular film under an external load in the presence of a tensile residual stress

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(02)01103-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Tensile residual stress in a plate or membrane clamped at the perimeter can be measured by either applying a uniform hydrostatic pressure or a central load via a cylindrical punch (with several different loading configurations). Analytical constitutive relations are derived here based on an average membrane stress approximation and are compared to finite element analysis results. The thickness and flexural rigidity of the film are not confined to a small range but will span a wide spectrum. The elastic responses of the blistering films are shown to be linear when the film is thick, relatively rigid, or subjected to a large residual stress, and cubic when the film is thin, flexible, or under a small residual stress. The linear-to-cubic transition is formulated.

Introduction

Thin film technology is indispensable in the microelectronics industry. Mechanical integrity (e.g. thin film adhesion) of coated parts has a significant impact on reliability, lifespan, and structural stability. Residual stresses can be introduced by volume changes associated with crosslinking or crystallization, by temperature changes, and by variations in moisture content or other diluents that may occur during processing, curing, or service life. Residual stresses within a film can lead to (i) delamination and premature failures due to the significant interfacial stresses that can occur near free edges and other flaws, (ii) damage such as environmental stress cracking in service conditions, and (iii) dimensional instability. Mechanical characterization of residual stress is essential for understanding and predicting the performance of thin film coated devices.

Many techniques have been developed to measure tensile residual stress such as lattice strain measurement using X-ray and neutron diffraction methods [1], [2], surface curvature measurement [3], [4], [5] and vibrational holographic methods [6], [7]. One classical way is to measure the elastic response of a suspended, circular film. A hole is drilled or chemically etched in the substrate until it reaches the film–substrate interface. Upon application of an external pressure or load, the drumhead will deform to form a blister with the elastic deflection depending on the magnitude of the tensile residual stress. In a residual stress-free film, the membrane stress increases from zero to a value determined by the external load. In a pre-stressed film, the total membrane stress is a superimposition of the residual stress and a concomitant stress due to change of blister profile. A diminished deflection is expected in the pre-stressed film compared to a stress-free film.

Application of a hydrostatic pressure to load a thin blistering film is well documented. The blister height is measured and related to the residual stress based on linear elasticity. Bennett [8] studied the elastic response of a thin stress-free plate and formulated analytical elastic solution as well as finite element analysis (FEA); Cotterell [9] studied blister delamination of thin films without residual stress; Williams [10] considered blistering film with a tensile residual stress but only for a thin flexible membrane under pure stretching; Jensen [11] investigated the presence of a compressive residual stress and its effects on thin film delamination; Allen [12], Lin [13] and Sizemore [14] verified experimentally their elastic model for thin flexible film and considered a perturbation of bending moment for thick films; Voorthuyzen [15] solved numerically the von Karman equation for a pressurized blistering film with residual stress; Sheplak [16] considered the transition from a rigid plate to a flexible membrane without residual stress; and Wan [17] presented an analytical constitutive equation for films spanning the entire range of film thickness and flexural rigidity but with zero residual stress. An alternative way of loading a blistering film is by a mechanical force applied via a rigid shaft. Williams [18], Malyshev [19] and Wan [20] studied the elastic response of a thin plate without residual stress; Wan investigated thin flexible stress-free films [21], [22] and films of intermediate thickness and flexural rigidity [23]. Jennings et al. [24] derived the most comprehensive elastic solution for thin films in the presence of large residual stress and introduced perturbation terms to account for bending moment in thick and rigid films. A detailed comparison between Jennings's solution and the one proposed herein will be discussed in Section 3.

In this paper, we will reconstruct the elastic models used in the pressurized blister test and three different shaft-loaded blister geometries based on an average equi-biaxial stress approximation, i.e. radial and tangential membrane stresses are identical and are independent of radial distance from the film center. This assumption allows us to derive an analytical solution for the elastic response rather than a numerical solution from the exact von Karman equations. The validity of the assumption will be discussed in Section 3. We will extend the previous work to include (i) films spanning the entire range of flexural rigidity and thickness, (ii) film deformed under a mixed mode of plate bending and membrane stretching and (iii) the full range of tensile residual stresses coupled with the concomitant membrane stress. Nonlinear FEA will be carried out to compare with and verify the closed-form solutions. Simple equations will be derived for gauging residual stress experimentally.

Section snippets

Theory

A circular isotropic plate of flexural rigidity, D=Eh3/12 with E′=E/(1−ν2), elastic modulus, E, Poisson's ratio, ν, radius, a and thickness, h, is stretched by an equi-biaxial residual membrane stress, σ0. Here we adopt an alternative definition of membrane stress, N00h, with units of N m−1. An external load with a general pressure distribution (or load function) Ψ(r) is applied to create a circular blister deflection w(r). The concomitant membrane stress, Nmmh, induced by the external load

Comparison between analytical solutions and FEA

In the pressurized blister, the pressure required to produce a given displacement, ρ(W0), computed by analytical solution agrees reasonably well with FEA, especially in the linear region (Fig. 1b). Close to the film center, Nr and Nt are almost identical and (Nr/Nt) is close to unity (Fig. 1c and d); while towards the film edge, deviation is observed. Hencky solved numerically the von Karman equation for a clamped circular plate with large deformation and zero residual stress, and obtained [29]σ

Conclusion

We have derived approximate elastic solutions for a pressurized blister and various forms of shaft-loaded blister configurations in the presence of an equi-biaxial tensile residual stress that will provide graphs and trends for residual stress measurement. The analytical solution is based on the assumptions that the radial and circumferential membrane stresses are equal and independent of radial position. Although the FEA suggests that these assumptions are not accurate, especially for small

Acknowledgements

This work was funded in part by the Hewlett Packard Corporation. We would like to acknowledge the Center of Adhesive and Sealant Science (CASS) of Virginia Tech for fostering inter-disciplinary research in adhesion science, and the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics for providing facilities and support. We are grateful to Dr Paul Reboa of the Hewlett Packard Corporation for helpful discussions.

References (32)

  • H.M. Jensen et al.

    Int. J. Solids Struct

    (1993)
  • J.A. Voorthuyzen et al.

    Sensors Actuators

    (1984)
  • K.-T. Wan et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1999)
  • K.-T. Wan et al.

    Acta Metal. Mater

    (1995)
  • I.C. Noyan et al.
  • S.G. Malhotra et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol

    (1996)
  • J. Tao et al.

    J. Electron. Mater

    (1991)
  • J.F. Geisz et al.

    J. Appl. Phys

    (1994)
  • D.J. Morrison et al.

    Mater. Res. Symp. Proc

    (1989)
  • M.A. Maden et al.

    J. Am. Ceram. Soc

    (1994)
  • Q.K. Tong et al.

    J. Am. Ceram. Soc

    (1994)
  • S.J. Bennett et al.

    Int. J. Fract

    (1974)
  • B. Cotterell et al.

    Int. J. Fract

    (1997)
  • J.G. Williams

    Int. J. Fract

    (1997)
  • M.G. Allen et al.

    J. Adhesion

    (1988)
  • P. Lin et al.

    Mater. Res. Symp. Proc

    (1990)
  • Cited by (156)

    • A general and unified theory of the kinematic relationships in bulge tests

      2020, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +1-540-231-4714.

    View full text