Elsevier

Aquaculture

Volume 218, Issues 1–4, 27 March 2003, Pages 567-588
Aquaculture

Impacts of longline mussel farming on oxygen and nitrogen dynamics and biological communities of coastal sediments

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00587-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Benthic communities and benthic mineralization were studied in two shallow coastal regions of New Zealand: Tasman Bay, a possible future site for mussel farm development, and Beatrix Bay, which already hosts several longline mussel farms.

In Tasman Bay, microphytobenthic (MPB) production added significantly to the total primary production of the bay. The activity of benthic microalgae had a pronounced effect on oxic conditions, solute exchange and denitrification rates. Benthic mineralization, quantified as the dark oxygen uptake, was in the range of 675±11 μmol m−2 h−1. Denitrification rates were high and fueled entirely by nitrate produced by the nitrifying community within the sediment. Competition for inorganic nitrogen between benthic microalgae and nitrifiers/denitrifiers resulted in diel variation in nitrogen cycling and reduced the inorganic nitrogen efflux and denitrification activity in the light. Calculated in electron equivalents, denitrification accounted for 11–20% of the total carbon mineralization—one of the highest numbers reported for coastal sediments.

Reduced sediments, containing low MPB biomass and few subsurface macroinvertebrate species, were observed below a mussel farm in Beatrix Bay, presumably due to the intensified sedimentation of organic matter. Oxygen consumption increased in the organic-rich sediments, and ammonium effluxes were up to 14 times higher than those of unaffected sediments 250 m away from the farm. Denitrification rates below the farm were low as the coupled nitrification–denitrification was inhibited by the presence of sulfide. The dissimilative reduction of nitrate to ammonium (DRNA) was, however, stimulated in the reduced sediment. The enhanced benthic mineralization was associated with sulfidic sediments and a lower nitrogen removal rate due to impeded benthic photosynthesis and denitrification activity. The described local conditions associated with mussel farming should be taken into account when new areas are considered for development.

Introduction

Annual world harvest of wild mussel stocks has increased during the past 20 years and has led to overexploitation of natural beds. Mussel aquaculture is consequently an expanding industry. New Zealand is among the five most important countries in terms of mussel production and international trade. While a number of species of mussels are farmed worldwide, the Greenshell™ mussel (Perna canaliculus) has been developed commercially in New Zealand, exclusively, with a current annual production of approximately 78,000 t wet weight (personal communication, Clarkson, Mussel Industry Council, New Zealand). Greenshell™ mussels are produced offshore on longline cultures in a number of locations in New Zealand. The most important growing area is within the Marlborough Sounds on the northern part of the South Island. A major expansion in production is planned for other areas of New Zealand, however, including the more exposed waters of Tasman Bay to the west.

Longline production in New Zealand generally places the mussels in the upper 10–15 m of the water column. Mussel filtration enhances the grazing pressure on the phytoplankton community and harvesting of the mussels represents an export of both carbon and nutrients. Perhaps more importantly, however, mussel farms also result in a concentration and redistribution of nutrients. Conditions of localised enrichment can arise through excretion of dissolved inorganic nutrients into the water column and increased sedimentation of organic material below the farms in the form of faecal and pseudofaecal materials, dead mussels and associated epibiota. Sedimentation rates have been reported to be two to three times higher underneath the mussel farms compared to ambient rates outside the farms Dahlback and Gunnarson, 1981, Grant et al., 1995. If we also consider mussel and epibiota drop-off during harvesting, much higher rates would be expected and longline mussel production may thereby dramatically alter the benthic environment.

Marine aquaculture of fish is known to have a severe local environmental impact due to the release of residual fish food and excreta to both the aquatic and benthic environments Kaspar et al., 1988, Hall et al., 1992, Christensen et al., 2000. In response, oxygen becomes depleted and sulfate reduction is stimulated leading to increased H2S production and subsequent displacement of fauna and benthic algae. The benthic effects of mussel farming, where no excess food is supplied, are supposed to be much less than those of caged fish farming. However, relatively little is known of the effects of longline mussel farming on benthic ecology, microbial mineralization and nutrient dynamics.

A major part of the carbon reaching the sea floor becomes mineralized mainly by different populations of microorganisms Berner, 1980, Canfield, 1989. In sediments that are exposed to light, benthic microalgae may add significantly to the total primary production of the system Sloth et al., 1996, Cahoon, 1999, Gillespie et al., 2000, Glud et al., 2002. Additionally, photosynthesis changes oxygen conditions and influences mineralization processes within the sediments Rysgaard et al., 1994, Fenchel and Glud, 2000. Expansion of the oxic zone can stimulate the prerequisite conditions for nitrification Risgaard-Petersen et al., 1994, Lorenzen et al., 1998, An and Joye, 2001. However, both nitrification and denitrification may be simultaneously inhibited by enhanced competition for inorganic nitrogen in the presence of benthic algae (Rysgaard et al., 1995). Burrowing sediment infauna can also greatly influence the oxic conditions of surface sediments, especially by transporting oxygen down into otherwise anoxic zones of the sediment. Such activities have been shown to stimulate nitrogen removal due to an enhanced, coupled nitrification–denitrification activity (Pelegri et al., 1994).

In the present study, we assessed benthic communities, oxygen dynamics, nutrient fluxes and denitrification rates in sediments from two coastal locations in New Zealand. The study included soft-bottom habitats of stations in Tasman Bay, which is currently not farmed but proposed for a major mussel farm development. Sediments from the same water depth beneath and outside the influence of a mussel farm in Beatrix Bay, Marlborough Sounds, were also studied.

Section snippets

Study locations

Studies were carried out in two semienclosed bays off the northern coast of the South Island of New Zealand: Tasman Bay, near the town of Motueka, and Beatrix Bay, to the East in the Marlborough Sounds (Fig. 1).

Tasman Bay is a large (1387 km2), relatively shallow embayment (primarily within the 30-m depth contour) that is exposed to Cook Strait to the northeast and the Tasman Sea to the northwest (MacKenzie and Gillespie, 1986). The bay supports important commercial finfish, shellfish and

Tasman Bay

Surface films of benthic diatoms were observed on the sediments of all three Tasman Bay stations. Through visual inspection of the cores, the patchy microalgal film was estimated to cover from 5% to 40% of the sediment surface, with more dense coverage at stations T2 and T3 compared to T1. This was also reflected in the chl a content (Table 1) and microalgal abundance in surface sediments, where the cell count of 5600 cm−2 at the deeper station (T3) was 3.7 times higher than at Station T1.

Importance of benthic microalgae and infauna

Benthic microalgae inhabited the subtidal sediments to considerable depth in Tasman Bay (i.e. up to 24 m) and had an obvious impact on primary production, nutrient fluxes and denitrification activity in the bay (Fig. 2). Sediment chl a concentrations (Table 1) were, however, low in comparison to reported values for other coastal locations (MacIntyre et al., 1996). Lowest chl a values were observed at the shallowest station (Station 1), possibly due to trawling disturbances as vessels were seen

Acknowledgements

Anni Glud, Rodney Roberts, Lincoln MacKenzie and Rod Asher are greatly acknowledged for help in the field and in the laboratory. Kitte Gerlich Lauridsen, Marlene Skjærbæk, Anna Haxen and Egon Frandsen did all the chemical analyses. Microalgal analyses were supervised by Lesley Rhodes. Macroinvertebrate samples were processed by Rod Asher and statistical comparisons of communities were provided by Barrie Forrest. This work was supported by the New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and

References (67)

  • M.T. Cabrita et al.

    Seasonal variation in denitrification and dissolved nitrogen fluxes in intertidal sediments of the Tagus estuary, Portugal

    Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser.

    (2000)
  • L.B. Cahoon

    The role of benthic microalgae in neritic ecosystems

  • P.B. Christensen et al.

    Microzonation of denitrification activity in stream sediments as studied with combined oxygen and nitrous oxide microsensor

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1989)
  • P.B. Christensen et al.

    The Danish Marine Environment: Has Actions Improved its State?

    (1998)
  • P.B. Christensen et al.

    Sediment mineralization, nutrient fluxes, denitrification and dissimilative nitrate reduction to ammonium in an estuarine fjord with sea cage trout farms

    Aquat. Microb. Ecol.

    (2000)
  • W.P. Cochlan et al.

    Diel periodicity of nitrogen uptake by marine phytoplankton in nitrate-rich environments

    Limnol. Oceanogr.

    (1991)
  • B. Dahlback et al.

    Sedimentation and sulfate reduction under a mussel culture

    Mar. Biol.

    (1981)
  • L.F. Dong et al.

    Denitrification in sediments of the River Colne estuary, England

    Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser.

    (2000)
  • E.H. Epping et al.

    Light-enhanced oxygen respiration in benthic phototrophic communities

    Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser.

    (1996)
  • B.D. Eyre et al.

    Comparison of isotope paring and N2/Ar methods for measuring denitrification—assumptions, modifications and implications

    Estuaries

    (2002)
  • T. Fenchel et al.

    Benthic primary production and O2–CO2 dynamics in a shallow water sediment: spatial and temporal heterogeneity

    Ophelia

    (2000)
  • P.A. Gillespie et al.

    Microphytobenthic communities of subtidal locations in New Zealand: taxonomy, biomass and food web implications

    N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (2000)
  • R.N. Glud et al.

    Photosynthesis and photosynthesis-coupled respiration in natural biofilms quantified with oxygen microsensors

    J. Phycol.

    (1992)
  • R.N. Glud et al.

    Benthic mineralization and exchange in Arctic sediments (Svalbard, Norway)

    Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser.

    (1998)
  • R.N. Glud et al.

    Electrochemical and optical oxygen microsensors for in situ measurements

  • R.N. Glud et al.

    Benthic carbon mineralization in a high-Arctic sound

    Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser.

    (2000)
  • R.N. Glud et al.

    Benthic diatoms of a high Arctic fjord (Young Sound, NE Greenland): importance for ecosystem primary production

    Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser.

    (2002)
  • J. Grant et al.

    Carbon and nitrogen scope for growth as a function of diet in the sea scallop Plectopecten magellanicus

    J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K.

    (1991)
  • J. Grant et al.

    A multidisciplinary approach to evaluating impacts of shellfish aquaculture on benthic communities

    Estuaries

    (1995)
  • K. Grasshoff et al.

    Methods of Seawater Analysis. 2nd Revised and Extended Version

    (1983)
  • P.O.J. Hall et al.

    Chemical fluxes and mass balances in a marine fish cage farm: I. Carbon

    Mar. Ecol., Prog. Ser.

    (1992)
  • J.I. Hansen et al.

    Seasonal distribution of nitrifying bacteria and rates of nitrification in coastal marine sediments

    Microb. Ecol.

    (1981)
  • S.B. Joye et al.

    Influence of sulfide inhibition of nitrification on nitrogen regeneration in sediments

    Science

    (1995)
  • Cited by (179)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text