A parallel 3D computational method for fluid–structure interactions in parachute systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00204-8Get rights and content

Abstract

We present a parallel finite element computational method for 3D simulation of fluid–structure interactions (FSI) in parachute systems. The flow solver is based on a stabilized finite element formulation applicable to problems involving moving boundaries and governed by the Navier–Stokes equations of incompressible flows. The structural dynamics (SD) solver is based on the total Lagrangian description of motion, with cable and membrane elements. The nonlinear equation system is solved iteratively, with a segregated treatment of the fluid and SD equations. The large linear equation systems that need to be solved at every nonlinear iteration are also solved iteratively. The parallel implementation is accomplished using a message-passing programming environment. As a test case, the method is applied to computation of the equilibrium configuration of an anchored ram-air parachute placed in an air stream.

Introduction

The parallel 3D computational method presented in this paper has been developed for modeling fluid–structure interactions (FSI) encountered in airdrop systems. The airdrop systems we focus on here include conventional personnel round parachutes, cross parachutes which have limited glide capability, and large gliding ram-air parachutes (parafoils) which can carry payloads up to 21 tons. The design emphasis for these parachute systems is precision delivery under demanding deployment conditions such as strong wind gusts and large offsets. Since conventional design techniques are time-consuming, expensive, and semi-empirical at best, our objective is to build a reliable and cost effective design tool based on the advanced flow simulation and modeling methods we have been developing.

Parachute systems present very complex dynamics arising from interactions between the canopy, suspension lines, payload, and the surrounding air. Parachutes can experience significant canopy deformations and changes in orientation at any stage of their deployment and operation. To correctly represent the actual behavior, modeling of these parachute systems has to involve solution of the governing equations over computational domains which change their shapes in time.

In the earlier models we developed [1], [2], [3], the parachute canopy was represented as a structure with prescribed shape changes, and its dynamics was determined as part of the overall solution of the coupled flow and dynamics equations. In a complementary effort, Benney et al. [4] presented detailed structural analysis of parachute systems with assumed air pressure distributions. Stein et al. [5] presented an axisymmetric model where the parachute structure was represented by cable and axisymmetric membrane elements, and its response was determined by solution of the equation system which took into account the coupling between this structural model and the fluid dynamics of the air surrounding it.

In the computational modeling presented in this paper, the fluid dynamics is governed by the Navier–Stokes equations of incompressible flows. The structural dynamics (SD) is governed by the membrane and cable equations with the Lagrangian description of motion.

In general, for flow problems involving moving boundaries and interfaces, including FSI, we employ the deformable-spatial-domain/stabilized space-time (DSD/SST) method introduced by Tezduyar et al. [6], [7]. This method takes automatically into account the changes in the shape of the spatial domain. The stabilized finite element formulations prevent numerical oscillations and other instabilities in solving problems with high Reynolds numbers and strong boundary layers. They also allow us to use equal-order interpolation functions for velocity and pressure. Some of the most established stabilized formulations for incompressible flows are the streamline-upwind/Petrov–Galerkin (SUPG) formulation [8], Galerkin/least-squares (GLS) formulation [9]), and pressure-stabilizing/Petrov–Galerkin (PSPG) formulation [10]. These formulations stabilize the method without introducing excessive numerical dissipation. 2D FSI methods, based on the DSD/SST formulation and developed for flow problems with moving mechanical components, were reported by Wren et al. [11]. 3D FSI simulations of a round parachute canopy with a flow solver based on the DSD/SST method were reported by Stein et al. [12]. In this paper, we focus on computing the equilibrium configuration of the parachute. Since the temporal accuracy is not an important issue for this simulation, we carry out the computations with the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) version of our stabilized formulation.

The SD solver is also based on a finite element formulation, and uses cable and membrane elements. The coupled, nonlinear equations system arising from this FSI model is solved iteratively. This is accomplished with a segregated treatment of the fluid and SD equation systems. Each of these nonlinear equation systems is solved with the Newton–Raphson method. The linear equation systems that need to be solved at each Newton–Raphson step are also solved iteratively. The flow and SD solvers have both been implemented for parallel computation within a message-passing programming environment. The complete simulation tool includes an algebraic mesh mover developed for updating the fluid mesh based on the motion of the fluid–structure interface.

The flow solver is described in Section 2, and the SD solver in Section 3. The FSI coupling technique is described in Section 4. Section 5 is a brief summary of the parallel implementation. In Section 6, we report, as a test case, computation of the equilibrium configuration of an anchored ram-air parachute placed in an air stream. The concluding remarks are given in Section 7.

Section snippets

Governing equations

Let ΩftRnsd be the spatial fluid domain of interest bounded by boundary Γft at any instant `t'. Here the superscript f stands for the fluid and nsd is the number of spatial dimensions. The Navier–Stokes equations governing incompressible flows areρfut+u·∇uff·σf=0onΩft,·u=0onΩft.Here ρf, u, ff and σf are the density, velocity, body force and the stress tensor, respectively. The stress tensor is written as the sum of its isotropic and deviatoric parts: σf(p,u)=−pI+T; and the fluid is

Governing equations

Let ΩstRnsd−1 be the spatial structure domain of interest bounded by boundary Γst at any instant t. Here the superscript s stands for the structure. The governing equations for the structure can be written as follows:ρsd2ydt2fs·σs=0onΩst.Here y is the structural displacement. The boundary Γst is composed of (Γst)g and (Γst)h.

The structure undergoes large deformations leading to geometric nonlinearities. The resulting strains are assumed to be small, and therefore a materially linear elastic

Interface treatment

Let Γtfs be the fluid boundary interfacing with the structure domain. The coupling is enforced by transferring the velocity and displacements from the structure to the fluid, and in return the surface forces from the fluid to the structure. Therefore, for the flow solver, Γtfs⊂(Γtf)g; and for the SD solver, Γtfs⊂Ωts. In transferring the fluid forces at the interface to the structure, we neglect the viscous part of these forces, and transfer only the pressure part.

In terms of the relationship

Parallel implementation

Both the flow and SD solvers have been implemented for parallel computation within a message-passing programming environment. In calculating the residual vectors for the flow solver, where the equation systems are a lot larger and therefore the memory requirements could be a lot higher, we have the option of using an element-vector-based (i.e., matrix-free) [16] or a sparse-matrix-based [17] computation method. In this paper, we use a special-purpose mesh moving method. However, in general, our

Simulation

The methods presented have been applied to calculating the equilibrium shape and orientation of an anchored ram-air parachute. Once placed in the air stream, the moments due to line drag cause the parachute to pitch backwards to a configuration where these moments are balanced by the nose-down aerodynamic moment on the canopy.

The following conditions and assumptions have been used in the parachute model and mesh design:

  • Ram-air parachutes have inlets at the leading edge which allow the air to

Concluding remarks

We presented a finite element method for parallel 3D computation of FSI encountered in aerodynamics of parachute systems. The flow solver is based on a stabilized finite element formulation which can handle problems with moving boundaries. The structural solver is based on a finite element formulation with cable and membrane elements. Different coupling strategies, based on segregated iterative solution of the fluid and structure equations, were discussed for time-integration of the nonlinear

Acknowledgements

This work was sponsored by NASA-JSC (grant NAG9-1059), AFOSR (contract F49620-98-1-0214), and by the Army High Performance Computing Research Center under the auspices of the Department of the Army, Army Research Laboratory cooperative agreement number DAAH04-95-2-0003/contract number DAAH04-95-C-0008. The content does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred.

References (18)

  • V. Kalro et al.

    Parallel finite element simulation of large ram-air parachutes

    Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids

    (1997)
  • V. Kalro, W. Garrard, T.E. Tezduyar, Parallel finite element computation of the flare maneuver of a large ram-air...
  • T. Tezduyar et al.

    Parallel computational methods for 3D simulation of a parafoil with prescribed shape changes

    Parallel Computing

    (1997)
  • R.J. Benney, K.R. Stein, J.W. Leonard, M.L. Accorsi, Current 3-D structural dynamic finite element modeling...
  • K. Stein, R. Benney, V. Kalro, A. Johnson, T.E. Tezduyar Parallel computation of parachute fluid–structure...
  • T.E. Tezduyar et al.

    A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces – the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary tests

    Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.

    (1992)
  • T.E. Tezduyar et al.

    A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces – the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure:II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders

    Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.

    (1992)
  • A.N. Brooks et al.

    Streamline upwind/Petrov–Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations

    Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.

    (1982)
  • T.J.R. Hughes et al.

    A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: VIII. The Galerkin/least-squares method for advective–diffusive equations

    Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.

    (1989)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (220)

  • An immersed MMALE material point method for FSI problems with structure fracturing

    2022, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • The Effect of Reefing Time on the Damage Process of the Supersonic Parachute

    2024, International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences
View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Currently at Fluent, Inc.

View full text