Findings and Theory in the Study of Fear Communications1

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60091-XGet rights and content

Publisher Summary

This chapter reviews the empirical results and theoretical underpinnings of studies of fear arousing communications. It focuses on the interrelationship of emotional and instrumental behavior. The chapter presents an overview of the key components of fear communication experiments and introduces the two major theoretical paradigms that can be used to interpret the findings. The first and historically most important of the paradigms is the fear drive model, a variant of the classic drive reduction model used in many animal learning studies. It assumes that the emotional response of fear functions as a drive that mediates belief change and behavior change. The second paradigm was suggested by the experimental data. This model assumes that the communication produces both persuasion and fear; fear does not cause persuasion. The chapter reviews the evidence regarding interactions between the level of fear elicited by the communication and other factors such as personality variables and recommendation effectiveness. It reveals that the outcomes are often influenced by complex contingencies. But despite the complexity, serious effort has been made to identify empirical regularities and presents a theoretical model to provide conceptual integration.

References (122)

  • BerlyneD.E.

    Structure and direction in thinking.

    (1965)
  • BindraD.

    Motivation: A systematic reinterpretation.

    (1959)
  • BrehmJ.

    A theory of psychological reactance.

    (1966)
  • BrockT.C.

    Commitment to exposure as a determinant of information receptivity

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1965)
  • BrockT.C. et al.

    Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1967)
  • BrunerJ.S.

    On perception readiness

    Psychological Review

    (1957)
  • CartwrightD.

    Some principles of mass persuasion. Selected findings of research in the scale of United States war bonds

    Human Relations

    (1949)
  • ChuG.C.

    Fear arousal, efficacy, and imminency

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1966)
  • ChurchR.M.

    The varied effects of punishment on behavior

    Psychological Review

    (1963)
  • CohenA.R.

    Need for cognitions on order of communication as determinants of opinion change

  • DabbsJ.M.

    Self-esteem, communicator characteristics, and attitude change

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1964)
  • DabbsJ.M. et al.

    Effects of varying the recommendations in a fear-arousing communication

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1966)
  • DeWolfeA.S. et al.

    Fear and attitude change

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1964)
  • DuffyE.

    Activation and behavior.

    (1962)
  • DukeJ.D.

    Critique of the Janis and Feshbach study

    Journal of Social Psychology

    (1967)
  • EpsteinS.

    Toward a unified theory of anxiety

  • EvansR.I. et al.

    New measure of effects of persuasive communications: a chemical indicator of toothbrushing behavior

    Psychological Reports

    (1968)
  • EysenckH.J.

    Smoking, health and personality.

    (1965)
  • FearingF.

    Toward a psychological theory of human communication

    Journal of Personality

    (1953)
  • FreemanG.L.

    The relationship between performance level and bodily activity level

    Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1940)
  • FreudS.

    Inhibition, symptoms and anxiety

    (1926)
  • FunkensteinD.H. et al.

    Mastery of stress.

    (1957)
  • GarnerW.R. et al.

    Operationism and the concept of perception

    Psychological Review

    (1956)
  • GoldsteinM.

    The relationship between coping and avoiding behavior and response to fear arousing propaganda

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1959)
  • GreenwaldA.

    Behavior change following a persuasive communication

    Journal of Personality

    (1965)
  • Haefner, D. Some effects of guilt arousing and fear arousing persuasive communications on opinion change. Technical...
  • HaefnerD.

    Arousing fear in dental health education

    Journal of Public Health Dentistry

    (1965)
  • HebbD.O.

    The organization of behavior.

    (1949)
  • HewgillM.A. et al.

    Source credibility and response to fear-arousing communications

    Speech Monographs

    (1965)
  • HilgardE. et al.

    Introduction to psychology.

    (1967)
  • HochbaumG.M.

    Public participation in medical screening programs: a sociopsychological study.

    (1958)
  • Horn, D. Factors affecting cessation of cigarette smoking: a prospective study. Paper presented at the meeting of the...
  • HorowitzI.A.

    Effects of volunteering, fear arousal, and number of communications on attitude change

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1969)
  • HovlandC.I.

    Effects of the mass media of communication

  • HovlandC.I. et al.

    Communication and persuasion.

    (1953)
  • InskoC.A. et al.

    Triadic consistency: A statement of affective-cognitive-conative consistency

    Psychological Review

    (1967)
  • JanisI.L.

    Psychological stress.

    (1958)
  • JanisI.L.

    Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and experimental research

  • JanisI. et al.

    Effects of fear-arousing communications

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1953)
  • JanisI.L. et al.

    Personality differences associated with responsiveness to fear-arousing communications

    Journal of Personality

    (1954)
  • Cited by (942)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    This chapter is an expanded version of a talk presented at the Eastern Psychological Association meetings in the spring of 1966. The research and theoretical ideas have benefited from discussion with a number of individuals in particular: James Dabbs, Jean Johnson. Neil Kornzweig. Patricia Niles. John Rosen. Robert Singer, and Jean C. Watts. Daniel Horn and Bernard Mausner have been helpful protagonists. and I am especially indebted to Sylvan Tomkins for many stimulating discussions of these ideas. I would also like to thank Richard Lazarus, Richard Nisbett, and Sidney Perloe for helpful comments on an early draft. Thanks also go to the editor of this series, Leonard Berkowitz, for his many helpful suggestions. Special thanks go to Mrs. Bonnie Simon whose diligent help made it possible to complete this chapter. The experimental work reported was supported by grants from the United State Public Health Service (CH 00371) and the United Health Foundation.

    View full text