A Relational Model of Authority in Groups

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-XGet rights and content

Publisher Summary

This chapter focuses on one particular aspect of authoritativeness: voluntary compliance with the decisions of authorities. Social psychologists have long distinguished between obedience that is the result of coercion, and obedience that is the result of internal attitudes. Opinions describe “reward power” and “coercive power”, in which obedience is contingent on positive and negative outcomes, and distinguish both of these types of power from legitimate power, in which obedience flows from judgments about the legitimacy of the authority. Legitimate power depends on people taking the obligation on themselves to obey and voluntarily follow the decisions made by authorities. The chapter also focuses on legitimacy because it is important to recognize, that legitimacy is not the only attitudinal factor influencing effectiveness. It is also influenced by other cognitions about the authority, most notably judgments of his or her expertise with respect to the problem at hand. The willingness of group members to accept a leader's directives is only helpful when the leader knows what directives to issue.

References (142)

  • E.A. Lind et al.

    Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments.

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1985)
  • R.T. Mowday et al.

    The measurement of organizational commitment.

    Journal of Vocational Behavior

    (1979)
  • L. Musante et al.

    The effects of control on perceived fairness of procedures and outcomes.

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1983)
  • J.S. Adams

    Inequity in social exchange.

  • J.W. Adler et al.

    Simple justice: How litigants fare in the Pittsburgh Court Arbitration Program.

    (1983)
  • S. Alexander et al.

    The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior.

    Social Justice Research

    (1987)
  • E. Barrett-Howard et al.

    Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions.

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.

    Federal Register

    (1979)
  • R.J. Bies

    The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage.

  • R.J. Bies et al.

    Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness.

  • R.J. Bies et al.

    Interaction fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts.

    Social Justice Research

    (1987)
  • R.J. Bies et al.

    Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict.

    Communication Research

    (1988)
  • P. Blau

    Exchange and power in social life.

    (1964)
  • R.L. Block

    Fear of crime and fear of police.

    Social Problems

    (1971)
  • P. Blumberg

    Inequality of an age of decline.

    (1980)
  • J.M. Brett

    Commentary on procedural justice papers.

  • M.B. Brewer et al.

    Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing.

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • P. Caddell

    Crisis of confidence: Trapped in a downward spiral.

    Public Opinion

    (1979)
  • D. Cartwright et al.

    Group dynamics.

    (1953)
  • J.D. Casper et al.

    Procedural justice in felony cases.

    Law and Society Review

    (1988)
  • J. Citrin

    Comment: The political relevance of trust in government.

    American Political Science Review

    (1974)
  • R.L. Cohen

    Procedural justice and participation.

    Human Relations

    (1985)
  • B.E. Collins et al.

    Group structure: Attraction, coalitions, communication, and power.

  • D.E. Conlon et al.

    Nonlinear and nonmonotonic effects of outcome on procedural and distributive fairness judgments.

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    (1989)
  • P.E. Converse

    The nature of beliefsystems in mass publics.

  • F. Crosby

    A model of egoistical relative deprivation.

    Psychological Review

    (1976)
  • F. Crosby

    Relative deprivation and working women.

    (1982)
  • F. Crosby

    Relative deprivation in organizational settings.

  • F. Crosby

    The denial of personal discrimination.

    American Behavioral Scientist

    (1984)
  • F. Crosby D. Nagata Denying personal disadvantage. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society...
  • R.M. Dawes et al.

    Organizing groups for collective action.

    American Political Science Review

    (1986)
  • A. deCarufel

    The allocation and acquisition of resources in times of scarcity.

  • M. Deutsch

    Justice in “the crunch.”

  • P.C. Earley et al.

    Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments.

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1987)
  • D. Easton

    A systems analysis of political life.

    (1965)
  • L. Festinger

    A theory of social comparison processes.

    Human Relations

    (1954)
  • R. Folger

    Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity.

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1977)
  • R. Folger

    Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model.

  • R. Folger et al.

    Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems.

  • R. Folger et al.

    Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions.

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1989)
  • R. Folger et al.

    Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity.

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1979)
  • J.R.P. French et al.

    The bases of social power.

  • W. Golding

    Lord of the flies.

    (1962)
  • J. Greenberg

    The justice of distributing scarce and abundant resources.

  • J. Greenberg

    Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the ends justify the means.

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1989)
  • J. Greenberg

    Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.

    Journal of Management

    (1990)
  • J. Greenberg

    Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice.

  • J. Greenberg et al.

    Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations.

  • F. Heider

    The psychology of interpersonal relations.

    (1958)
  • E.P. Hollander

    Leadership and social exchange processes.

  • Cited by (2241)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text