Chapter Three - Psychological License: When it is Needed and How it Functions

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43003-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Differences among people in the actions they take or the opinions they express do not always reflect differences in underlying attitudes, preferences, or motivations. When people differ in the extent to which they are psychologically licensed (i.e., feel able to act without discrediting themselves), they will act differently despite having similar attitudes, preferences, and motivations. Wanting to do something is not sufficient to spur action; one must also feel licensed to do it. We show that feeling licensed can liberate people to express morally problematic attitudes that those who do not feel licensed are inhibited from expressing. We also show that feeling one lacks license can inhibit people from expressing even morally nonproblematic attitudes that those who feel licensed are comfortable expressing. This chapter explores a wide range of social phenomena in which licensing plays a role and identifies a number of variables that grant or revoke psychological license.

Section snippets

Moral Licensing

A common reason people do not act upon or even express their attitudes is that they fear that doing so will signal to themselves and others something morally discrediting about the self. For example, people will refrain from expressing pride so as not to appear boastful, abstain from dessert so as not to feel like a glutton, or avoid violating a group norm so as not to be seen as a bad group member. But people's concern that a particular action will signal something discrediting about them does

Standing as License

Sometimes, people are concerned that their future actions will signal something morally questionable about themselves, and therefore they require what we have described as a moral license, obtained from their past behavior, in order to act comfortably. Other times, however, people feel uncomfortable expressing or acting upon attitudes that are not themselves morally problematic. Even when people are not concerned that an attitude will call their morality into question (e.g., portray them as a

Summary

People who hold different attitudes are not always equally willing to express or act upon them. One obvious reason for this is that some attitudes are more socially desirable than others: people will be reluctant to reveal unpopular or otherwise-discrediting attitudes. But it is not only the content of attitudes that affects people's comfort expressing them. Even people holding the same attitude can vary greatly in how comfortable they are expressing it. This chapter considered two reasons why

References (67)

  • C.F. Camerer

    Behavioral game theory

    (2003)
  • C.S. Crandall et al.

    A justification-suppression of the expression and experience of prejudice

    Psychological Bulletin

    (2003)
  • J.R. Crosby et al.
  • A.M. Czopp

    I'm not racist but … I'm racist: Blacks' and Whites' evaluations of disclaimers of prejudice

    (2009, February)
  • D.G. Dutton

    Reactions of restauranteurs to blacks and whites violating restaurant dress requirements

    Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

    (1971)
  • D.A. Effron et al.
  • D.A. Effron et al.
  • D.A. Effron et al.
  • L. Festinger

    A theory of cognitive dissonance

    (1957)
  • A. Fishbach et al.

    Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice

    Journal of Consumer Research

    (2005)
  • A. Fishbach et al.

    Subgoals as substitutes or complements: The role of goal accessibility

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2006)
  • J.L. Freedman et al.

    Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1966)
  • E. Goffman

    The presentation of the self in everyday life

    (1959)
  • J. Goldberg

    Israel's ‘American problem'

    New York Times

    (2008)
  • D.P. Green et al.

    Who protests: Self-interest and White opposition to busing?

    Journal of Politics

    (1992)
  • D. Hakim et al.

    G.O.P. Consultant says he reported spitzer trysts in 2007

    The New York Times

    (2008)
  • E.P. Hollander

    Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit

    Psychological Review

    (1958)
  • M.J. Hornsey et al.

    Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect

    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

    (2004)
  • M.J. Hornsey et al.

    You can criticize because you care: Identity attachment, constructiveness, and the intergroup sensitivity effect

    European Journal of Social Psychology

    (2004)
  • J. Jordan et al.
  • U. Khan et al.

    Licensing effect in consumer choice

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (2006)
  • U. Khan et al.

    Where there is a way, there is a will? The effect of future choices on self-control

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    (2007)
  • M. Koo et al.

    Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2008)
  • Cited by (291)

    • Advantaged groups misperceive how allyship will be received

      2024, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text