Soot-field structure in laminar soot-emitting microgravity nonpremixed flames
References (22)
- et al.
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
(1994) - et al.
Acta Astronaut.
(1986) - et al.
Combust. Flame
(1994) - et al.
Combust. Flame
(1995) - et al.
Combust. Flame
(1996) - et al.
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
(1981) - et al.
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
(1981) Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
(1992)- et al.
Combust. Flame
(1983) - et al.
Combust. Flame
(1990)
Combustion in Microgravity: Opportunities, Challenges, and Progress
AIAA Paper 90-0120
Cited by (24)
A historical overview of experimental solid combustion research in microgravity
2022, Acta AstronauticaAccessing the soot-related radiative heat feedback in a flame spreading in microgravity: Optical designs and associated limitations
2021, Proceedings of the Combustion InstituteFire safety in space – Investigating flame spread interaction over wires
2016, Acta AstronauticaCitation Excerpt :In a similar manner, the interaction among spreading flames has been the subject of several studies [13,14] but still merits further scientific investigation, in particular, for microgravity and low characteristic forced velocities conditions. The absence of natural convection allows a significant increase of the time scales associated with transport and combustion processes, increasing both soot concentration [15] and radiative emissions, especially from the soot continuum [16]. Transport thus changes the nature of the combustion processes and the interaction between the flame and the solid fuels in a manner that is still not fully understood.
Phenomenological model of soot production inside a non-buoyant laminar diffusion flame
2015, Proceedings of the Combustion InstituteCitation Excerpt :Of critical importance is the effect of oxygen concentration on the formation and oxidation, which connects soot history and local soot concentrations to the structure of the flow field in the vicinity of the flame. The global residence time, defined as the ratio of the characteristic flame length to the governing mass transport velocity, seems to be a key parameter controlling soot concentrations [2,14]. Konsur et al. [14] determined experimentally that the peak soot volume fraction decreased when the characteristic global residence time was reduced and Mortazavi et al. [17] extended similar observations to a wider range of conditions.
Influence of thermal radiation on soot production in Laminar axisymmetric diffusion flames
2013, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative TransferA numerical study on the effects of pressure and gravity in laminar ethylene diffusion flames
2011, Combustion and FlameCitation Excerpt :For example, the peak soot volume fraction in zero gravity is roughly 1.4, 1.6, 2.0, 2.7, and 2.2 times larger than the equivalent normal-gravity flame at 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, and 5 atm, respectively. A similar factor-of-two enhancement of the peak soot volume fraction in micro-gravity was measured during drop-tower experiments [22,27,66] and predicted by Kong and Liu [36,37]. Kaplan et al. [18] predicted a much larger 11-fold increase in soot volume fraction for laminar ethylene–air jet diffusion flames in quiescent air.