Surface analysis of dental amalgams by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction
Introduction
The mercury evaporation from amalgam restorations in the oral cavity has been extensively debated in recent years. The evaporation occurs not only from the newly made restoration but also from the set material [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. In an ongoing study, Berglund et al. studied the in vitro mercury evaporation from brushed surfaces of four different brands of amalgam. The conventional type of amalgam showed a more rapid decrease of mercury release after brushing compared to the other types. The mercury evaporation is closely related to the state of the amalgam surface. Therefore, an analysis of the chemical state of the amalgam surface is necessary in order to reveal the relationship between the mercury release and amalgam composition.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) provide the chemical state information on the surface layer and the depth composition profiles. Therefore, XPS and AES have been widely applied for the analysis of surface layer of amalgam. Hanawa et al. [15], [16] revealed that the zinc containing amalgam forms a tin and zinc oxide layer on the surface and this layer suppresses the mercury evaporation. Nakajima et al. [17] using AES reported that the surface of indium containing amalgam was rapidly covered with both an indium and a tin oxide films. McDermott et al. [18] studied the surface of high copper amalgams using XPS and suggested a SnO2 like surface oxide component in high copper amalgams.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the surface layers formed on four different brands of amalgams and estimate the relationship between the chemical state of surface layers and mercury release rates.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The dental amalgam alloys tested were ANA 68, ANA 2000, Dispersalloy and Indiloy (Table 1). The cylindrical specimens of each alloy (4 mm in diameter, 8 mm in height) were prepared by a specially trained person. This was carried out 5 years prior to the measurements of mercury release according to the procedures outlined in ISO 1559:1995 Dental materials–alloys for dental amalgam. The specimens were kept in dried air at room temperature. The specimens were thereafter cut into disks with a
Results
The bulk composition (Table 1) and the surface composition of metallic elements measured by XPS (oxygen and carbon excluded) of nearly non-oxidized (fresh) and fully oxidized (aged) surfaces are shown in Fig. 1. The oxygen content of fresh and aged surfaces were shown in Table 2. With increasing oxidation from a fresh surface to an aged surface, the surface content of tin and oxygen increased in all amalgams. In contrast, the surface contents of copper and mercury decreased. In the zinc
Discussion
As shown in Fig. 1, the amalgam surfaces were enriched either with tin, zinc, indium or two of these and oxygen with oxidation. The surfaces of conventional amalgam (ANA 68) and high copper amalgam (ANA 2000) were rapidly enriched with tin. The zinc containing amalgam Dispersalloy showed rapid increase of zinc content and a slow increase of tin content on the surface. The indium containing amalgam Indiloy showed a rapid increase of indium. The tin content for fresh surfaces and aged surfaces of
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the scientific exchange program between the Royal Swedish Academy of Science and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The authors would like to thank Dr Andrei Shchukarev and Dr Dan Boström, Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Umeå University, for XPS and XRD measurements. The authors would also like to thank Ms Ewa Gruffman and Mr Rolf Olofsson, Department of Dental Materials Science, Umeå University, for the valuable technical assistance. The authors
References (25)
- et al.
Chewing releases mercury from fillings
Lancet
(1979) - et al.
Quantitation of total mercury vapor released during dental procedures
Dent Mater
(1992) - et al.
Mercury levels in plasma and urine after removal of all amalgam restorations: the effect of using rubber dams
Dent Mater
(1997) - et al.
Effects of palladium addition on emission of mercury vapor from dental amalgam
Dent Mater
(1999) - et al.
The effect of dental amalgams on mercury levels in expired air
J Dent Res
(1981) - et al.
The effect of dental amalgam restorations on blood mercury levels
J Dent Res
(1984) - et al.
Mercury in human breath from dental amalgams
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol
(1985) - et al.
Intra-oral air mercury released from dental amalgam
J Dent Res
(1985) - et al.
Serial measurements of intra-oral air mercury: estimation of daily dose from dental amalgam
J Dent Res
(1985) - et al.
Mercury exposure from dental fillings. II. Release and absorption
Swed Dent J
(1988)
Determination of the rate of release of intra-oral mercury vapor from amalgam
J Dent Res
Estimation by a 24 h study of the daily dose of intra-oral mercury vapor inhaled after release from dental amalgam
J Dent Res
Cited by (17)
Gallium and gallium semiconductor compounds
2021, Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals: Fifth EditionIndium
2021, Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals: Fifth EditionNovel nontoxic electrochemical method for the detection of cefadroxil in pharmaceutical formulations and biological samples
2020, Microchemical JournalCitation Excerpt :The diffraction peaks of nano-silver amalgam paste observed at (321), (411), (600) and (721) as shown in Fig. 2b. These peaks resembled those diffraction peaks with an intense peak at 411 reported in database of XRD [35,37]. Thus, it can be suggested that nano-silver amalgam paste has isometric (cubic)-Hexa-octahedral crystalline structure with a unit cell of 10.06 Å and quit resembled the natural mineral of gamma-moschellandsbergite (Ag2Hg3) [35].
Indium
2015, Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals: Fourth EditionIndium
2014, Handbook on the Toxicology of MetalsEffect of corrosion on the strength of dental silver amalgam
2012, Dental MaterialsCitation Excerpt :As has been recently discussed, dental silver amalgam retains an important place in the dental armamentarium [1]. Broadly speaking, it may be considered a ‘mature’ technology, as is indicated perhaps by the rather low and declining rate of publications dealing with the material, despite one or two attempted rejuvenations, such as with gallium or indium additions [2–7]. Nevertheless, because of the continued volume of use, it is important to maintain performance standards, even if (and perhaps especially because) in countries where more expensive substitutes are affordable, despite their poorer performance, it is being banned or abandoned on presumed environmental grounds (which is another long and separate debate, by no means clear cut).