Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 374, Issue 9705, 5–11 December 2009, Pages 1917-1929
The Lancet

Series
Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: household energy

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61713-XGet rights and content

Summary

Energy used in dwellings is an important target for actions to avert climate change. Properly designed and implemented, such actions could have major co-benefits for public health. To investigate, we examined the effect of hypothetical strategies to improve energy efficiency in UK housing stock and to introduce 150 million low-emission household cookstoves in India. Methods similar to those of WHO's Comparative Risk Assessment exercise were applied to assess the effect on health that changes in the indoor environment could have. For UK housing, the magnitude and even direction of the changes in health depended on details of the intervention, but interventions were generally beneficial for health. For a strategy of combined fabric, ventilation, fuel switching, and behavioural changes, we estimated 850 fewer disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and a saving of 0·6 megatonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2), per million population in 1 year (on the basis of calculations comparing the health of the 2010 population with and without the specified outcome measures). The cookstove programme in India showed substantial benefits for acute lower respiratory infection in children, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and ischaemic heart disease. Calculated on a similar basis to the UK case study, the avoided burden of these outcomes was estimated to be 12 500 fewer DALYs and a saving of 0·1–0·2 megatonnes CO2-equivalent per million population in 1 year, mostly in short-lived greenhouse pollutants. Household energy interventions have potential for important co-benefits in pursuit of health and climate goals.

Introduction

Climate change presents a formidable challenge to societies throughout the world.1, 2, 3 Targets to limit the global temperature rise to around 2°C and the risk of dangerous climate change to a low level present a very challenging abatement path, needing a worldwide peak in greenhouse-gas emissions within only a few years and a steep fall that would halve emissions by around 2050.4 Even this target might be insufficiently ambitious. We employ the widely used term greenhouse gases, although since some anthropogenic climate-active atmospheric species are aerosols, greenhouse pollutants is a more accurate term. Most important of the climate-active aerosols produced by human activities are black carbon, sulphate, and organic carbon particles, which have important although not identical health effects, but quite different climate implications.5

Key messages

  • Many important health and climate outcomes are related to the products of incomplete combustion that are emitted from traditional solid fuel use in developing countries, even when little carbon dioxide (CO2) is produced overall.

  • Sustained national programmes to promote modern low-emissions stove technology for burning of local biomass fuels in poor countries provide a highly cost-beneficial means to potentially avert millions of premature deaths and hundreds of millions of tonnes of CO2-equivalent greenhouse pollutants. Such programmes could help countries to achieve Millennium Development Goals and climate targets, and offer one of the strongest climate–health links with respect to co-benefits.

  • Improvements in the efficiency of UK household energy use could, if implemented correctly, have appreciable benefits for population health, mainly arising from improved indoor air quality and control of winter indoor temperatures.

  • For UK housing interventions, the magnitude and even direction of effects on health depend on how energy efficiency measures are implemented and maintained. Potential for adverse health outcomes arises from increases in indoor concentrations of pollutants, including radon and environmental tobacco smoke, in dwellings with energy efficiency measures that reduce air exchange; and increased ingress of outdoor particle pollutants with higher air exchange rates in dwellings fitted with mechanical ventilation systems unless there is effective filtering of air.

  • Household energy interventions in low-income settings have greater potential to improve public health than do those in high-income countries, but household energy interventions in high-income settings have potential for greenhouse-gas reduction per dwelling and are vital for achievement of climate abatement targets worldwide.

Urgent and profound changes in power generation and energy use in all sectors are therefore necessary, especially in high-income countries, where a halving of emissions is needed by 2030.4, 6 Action to reduce energy use by households and in buildings is especially important because of the scale of their contribution to greenhouse-gas emissions and the opportunities for emissions reduction. Currently, energy use in UK residential buildings is estimated to account for around 140 megatonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions,4, 7 or around 26% of the country's total (table 1). Substantial reductions in these emissions are achievable with present technology and through energy efficiency, behavioural change, and low-carbon power generation.4

In low-income countries, where per head emissions are low, global principles of equitable burden sharing imply that less contraction in greenhouse-gas emissions is necessary compared with high-income countries, and even, in some cases, an increase to a sustainable per head worldwide average. But even in such settings, efficiency and cleanliness of household energy use can be improved, with both greenhouse-pollutant reductions and direct health benefits from reduced indoor and outdoor air pollution. Improvement of combustion efficiency of solid household fuels (biomass and coal) used by poor populations of developing countries is one of the greatest opportunities for health co-benefits worldwide and was among the first to be recognised.8 The poorest half of the world's households rely on such fuels, with the highest fraction of households in sub-Saharan Africa, followed by low-income Asia (figure 1).9, 10

Most of this combustion is done in simple stoves with low combustion efficiency, thus producing large amounts of products of incomplete combustion,5 with consequences for both climate and health. When biomass is harvested renewably—eg, from standing tree stocks or agricultural wastes (crop residues and animal dung)—no contribution to atmospheric CO2 is made. Net CO2 is produced, however, when harvesting of wood fuels leads to deforestation. In detail, such determinations are difficult and depend on local, sometimes changing, conditions. Therefore, we do not assume any CO2 reductions. Because the products of incomplete combustion include important short-lived greenhouse pollutants, however, even sustainable harvesting does not make such fuel cycles greenhouse neutral.5

Section snippets

Case studies

We considered case studies in two countries—the UK and India—as examples of high and low per head CO2 emissions. The International Energy Annual11 shows that, in 2006, emissions of CO2 from the consumption and flaring of fossil fuels were 9·66 metric tonnes per head in the UK and 1·16 tonnes per head in India. These figures rank the UK 49th highest worldwide in terms of per head emissions of 206 countries with 2006 emissions data (15th highest of 35 European countries), and India as 137th

Modelling changes in health

We began by mapping the complex connections between energy production and use as it relates to the built environment (webappendix p 2).24 We concentrated on the part of this scheme that relates to the indoor environment (figure 2). The changes in health relating to energy supply systems for commercial energy are partly addressed in a separate report about electricity generation25 and are not considered here. Nor did we include the role of household fuel combustion on outdoor air pollution, or

UK household energy efficiency programme

All UK energy efficiency scenarios, with important caveats, result in an overall benefit to health, but with some negative effects relating to specific forms of exposure (table 3). For the fabric improvement scenario (scenario 1) we assumed that fabric improvements did not change ventilation characteristics and that the effect on health was confined to temperature effects arising from reduced heat loss. The changes in health consisted of both direct effects on winter mortality and potentially

Discussion

The modelling we have presented should be interpreted as illustrative of the scale of health benefits that are associated with selected strategies aimed at abatement of emissions of greenhouse pollutants. The broad conclusion is clear—that in both high-income and low-income settings there is a set of abatement actions with appreciable potential overall benefits to health. In the contrasting examples we investigated, the health benefits seem especially great for the populations of India that

References (73)

  • K Smith et al.

    100-million improved cookstoves in China—how was it done

    World Dev

    (1993)
  • V Ramanathan et al.

    Air pollution, greenhouse gases and climate change: global and regional perspectives

    Atmos Environ

    (2009)
  • R Monastersky

    Climate crunch: a burden beyond bearing

    Nature

    (2009)
  • S Solomon et al.

    Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2009)
  • JA Lowe et al.

    How difficult is it to recover from dangerous levels of global warming?

    Environ Res Lett

    (2009)
  • Building a low-carbon economy—the UK's contribution to tackling climate change. First report of the Climate Change Committee. Part 1. The 2050 target

    (2008)
  • KR Smith et al.

    Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: health implications of short-lived greenhouse pollutants

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • National atmospheric emissions inventory. UK CO2 emissions data, 2008

    (2009)
  • KR Smith

    Health, energy, and greenhouse-gas impacts of biomass combustion

    Energy Sustain Dev

    (1995)
  • K Smith et al.

    Indoor smoke from household solid fuels

  • Mehta S. Characterizing exposures to indoor air pollution from household solid fuel use. PhD dissertation, University...
  • Data table H.1co2 World carbon dioxide emissions from the consumption and flaring of fossil fuels (million metric tons of carbon dioxide), 1980–2006

  • Energy consumption in the UK

    (2008)
  • J Goldemberg et al.

    Rural energy in developing countries

  • Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India; April 4, 2005

  • U Kapil et al.

    Integrated child development services scheme (ICDS) in India: its activities, present status and future strategy to reduce malnutrition

    J Indian Med Assoc

    (2000)
  • National family health survey

    (2006)
  • KR Smith et al.

    Personal child and mother carbon monoxide exposures and kitchen levels: methods and results from a randomized trial of woodfired chimney cookstoves in Guatemala (RESPIRE)

    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol

    (2009)
  • M Dherani et al.

    Indoor air pollution from unprocessed solid fuel use and pneumonia risk in children aged under five years: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Bull World Health Organ

    (2008)
  • K Smith et al.

    Greenhouse implications of household fuels: an analysis for India

    Ann Rev Energy Environ

    (2000)
  • Clean Development Mechanism, UN Framework Convention on Climate Change

  • The Gold Standard: Premium Quality Carbon Credits, The Gold Standard Foundation, Geneva-Cointrin

  • JA Patz et al.

    Impact of regional climate change on human health

    Nature

    (2005)
  • JJ Walker et al.

    Does usage of household heating influence internal environmental conditions and health?

    Eur J Public Health

    (2006)
  • S Darby et al.

    Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies

    BMJ

    (2005)
  • Cited by (318)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text