Efficient algorithms for calculation of shear stress amplitude and amplitude of the second invariant of the stress deviator in fatigue criteria applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00181-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Criteria based on both critical plane and stress invariant approaches require routines for the calculation of the amplitude of critical stress quantities. The definition of the shear stress amplitude on a material plane as well as the evaluation of the amplitude of the second invariant of the stress deviator can be led back to an optimization problem which can be quickly solved with already existing routines. In this paper a new method is presented and results are compared with those obtained with other previously proposed algorithms.

Introduction

Many of the existing high cycle fatigue criteria can be divided into two groups [1]. The first group includes the criteria based on the critical plane concept. The second group comprises the criteria based on the stress invariants. Critical plane type criteria usually require the evaluation of the amplitude of the shear stress τa acting tangentially to the critical plane. Stress invariants based criteria typically call for the determination of the amplitude of the second invariant of the stress deviator J2,a. From this, J2,a can be found, which has dimension of stress.

With the exception of proportional paths, the evaluation of τa and J2,a is not a trivial problem. A coherent definition of the shear stress amplitude has been given by Papadopoulos [2]. It is based on the construction of the minimum circle circumscribed to the path described by the shear stress vector on the critical plane. The radius of the minimum circumscribed circle is defined to be the shear stress amplitude. This definition can be extended to the case of J2,a. It is then required to construct the minimum hyper-sphere which encompasses the load path in the stress deviator space. Its radius is equal to J2,a.

Algorithms for constructing the minimum circumscribed circle or hyper-sphere have already been proposed by Papadopoulos [2] and Dang Van et al. [3]. However, these methods often necessitate a large amount of computational time. The purpose of the present paper is to introduce an efficient algorithm for the rapid calculation of τa and of J2,a. The proposed method makes use of numerical optimization routines currently available as free Fortran or C source codes or as part of commercial mathematical software.

Section snippets

The critical plane approach

One of the first fatigue criteria based on the critical plane concept first appeared in the paper of Findley [4]. On a given elementary plane Δ, identified by its normal vector n, the stress tensor σ combined with n defines the normal stress vector σNσN=(n·σ·nnand the shear stress vector ττ=σ·n−(n·σ·nn.Following Findley, the most damaged plane is the one experiencing the greatest sum of the amplitude of the shear stress vector and of the normal stress. Thus the criterion is written asτa

Criteria based on the stress invariants

Concerning the stress invariant based criteria, the critical quantity is usually the second invariant of the stress deviator, calculated taking into consideration only the alternating components. This quantity is thus defined as J2,a. Among these criteria let us recall the Sines criterionJ2,a+κpm≤λ.The term J2,a was originally intended as J2 calculated over the alternating components, i.e. over σij,a if σij(t)=σij,m+σij,af(t).

Later Fuchs, as reported by Garud [14] and Bannantine et al. [15],

Shear stress amplitude calculation

Supposing the shear stress acting on Δ being defined by its components in a Cartesian reference (u,v) fixed on Δτu=sin(ωt)τv=sin(2ωt−π/4)the shear stress tip follows the curve shown in Fig. 4.

The centre of the circumscribed circle and its radius have been calculated with the Points Combination Algorithm (being affected by roundoff errors only, its results can be considered the reference solution), the Incremental Method and fminimax, all implemented in a Matlab [10] script, and yielded the

Concluding remarks

Critical plane type criteria as well as second invariant based criteria applied to non proportional load paths require to find the centre of respectively the circle and the hyper-sphere circumscribing the load path.

The Points Combination Algorithm allows to solve this problem with high accuracy but it makes calculation time too long if the load path is defined with a very fine time step.

Optimization routines give the same results with a number of function evaluations almost independent of the

Acknowledgements

The author expresses his gratitude to Dr. K. Dang Van and Dr. H. Maitournam of LMS, Ecole Polytechnique, France, for their valuable advice and encouragement and for providing him with the stress data and the Point Combination Algorithm results shown in the second example. The author also wishes to thank Dr. I.V. Papadopoulos of JRC, Ispra, Italy, for useful suggestions and comments on the contents of this paper.

References (15)

  • I.V. Papadopoulos et al.

    A comparative study of multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criteria for metals

    Int. J. Fatigue

    (1997)
  • I.V. Papadopoulos

    Critical plane approaches in high-cycle fatigue: on the definition of the amplitude and mean value of the shear stress acting on the critical plane

    Fatigue Fract. Engng Mater. Struct.

    (1998)
  • K. Dang Van et al.

    On a new multiaxial fatigue limit criterion: theory and applications

  • W.N. Findley

    A theory for the effect of mean stress on fatigue of metals under combined torsion and axial load or bending

    J. Engng Ind. Trans. ASME

    (1959)
  • T. Matake

    An explanation on fatigue limit under combined stress

    Bull. JSME

    (1977)
  • D.L. McDiarmid

    A general criterion for high cycle multiaxial fatigue failure

    Fatigue Fract. Engng Mater. Struct.

    (1991)
  • M.W. Brown et al.

    A theory for fatigue under multiaxial stress–strain conditions

    Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs

    (1973)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (55)

  • A numerical investigation on multiaxial fatigue assessment of Nitinol peripheral endovascular devices with emphasis on load non-proportionality effects

    2019, Engineering Fracture Mechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    The clear difference between FS and BM criteria predictions, when reversal or MCC methods are used for calculating the shear strain amplitude, underlines the importance of evaluating the effects of all the fatigue cycle when non-proportional local responses are activated. However, due to the high computational cost of the MCC approach implementation, when the fatigue assessment have to be performed on the whole device (no specific areas of high deformation can be recognized), a more efficient algorithm could be employed to allow faster analyses [44,45]. The presence of stress concentrations, combined with high three-dimensional stress/strain gradients, affects the material response, leading to a reduced number of elements experiencing RF > 1: operating the fatigue strength assessment then requires a particular attention in choosing the model mesh size, which may affect the results.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text