Patterning proteins and cells using soft lithography
Introduction
This review describes techniques for patterning the properties and structures of surfaces at the molecular level, and for using these patterns to control both the adsorption of proteins to these surfaces and the attachment of cells to them. The ability to generate patterns of proteins and cells on surfaces is important for biosensor technology [1], [2], [3], [4] for tissue engineering [5], and for fundamental studies of cell biology [6], [7], [8]. The placement of biological ligands at well-defined locations on substrates is required for certain biological assays, for combinatorial screening, and for the fabrication of biosensors. Biosensors based on living cells [3], [9], [10], [11], [12] can also be used for environmental and chemical monitoring; accurate positioning of the cells used for sensing on these devices is critical for monitoring the status of the cells. Control over the positioning of cells is also important for cell-based screening, in which individual cells need to be accessed repeatedly to perturb them and to monitor their response. Tissue engineering may require that cells be placed in specific locations to create organized structures. Patterning techniques that control both the size and shape of the cell anchored to a surface, and the chemistry and topology of the substrate to which the cell is attached, are also extremely useful in understanding the influence of the cell–material interface on the behavior of cells [7], [8], [13], [14].
Photolithography is the technique that has been used most extensively for patterning proteins and cells. For example, photolithography can be used to generate patterns by photoablating proteins preadsorbed to a silicon or glass surface [15], by immobilizing proteins on thiol-terminated siloxane films that have been patterned by irradiation with UV light [16], and by covalently linking proteins to photosensitive groups [17]. Although photolithography is a technique that is highly developed for patterning, the high costs associated with photolithographic equipment, and the need for access to clean rooms, make this technique inconvenient for biologists. Photolithography is not well suited for introducing either specific chemical functionalities, or delicate ligands required for bio-specific adsorption, onto surfaces. Photolithography cannot be used to pattern non-planar substrates. While photolithography can be used to produce patterns with features smaller than 1 μm, this resolution may be unnecessary for many applications of patterning in cell biology.
We have developed a set of microfabrication techniques that is an alternative to photolithography for patterning surfaces used in biochemistry and biology. We call this set `soft lithography’ [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], because each of the techniques uses stamps or channels fabricated in an elastomeric (`soft') material for pattern transfer or modification. Soft lithographic techniques are not expensive, are procedurally simple, can be used to pattern a variety of different planar and non-planar substrates, and do not require stringent control over the laboratory environment for their successful application.
This review will focus on the patterning of proteins and cells using soft lithographic techniques, in programs carried out in our group and by others. The patterning of proteins and cells by other techniques will not be discussed in this review, other than by reference (Table 1).
Section snippets
Elastomeric stamps
Soft lithographic methods use an elastomeric stamp or mold, prepared by casting the liquid prepolymer of an elastomer against a master that has a patterned relief structure (Fig. 1). Photolithography is used only for the fabrication of the masters. Most of the research based on soft lithography has used poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) as the elastomer. PDMS has several properties [24] that make it well suited for patterning proteins and cells. PDMS is biocompatible, permeable to gases, and can be
Microcontact printing
Since many of the studies involving the patterning of proteins and cells using microcontact printing have used self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of alkanethiols on gold, we begin with a brief discussion of these SAMs. While SAMs can also be formed on silver, and are more ordered on silver than on gold, the cytotoxicity of the Ag+ released from the silver films when they are exposed to air or other oxidants limits the use of these films in biological experiments involving living cells.
Conclusions
The soft lithographic techniques described in this review are a powerful set of tools for controlling the cell–material interface. These techniques offer several advantages over conventional photolithographic techniques. They are inexpensive, and are accessible to chemists and biologists. They allow the patterning of delicate ligands on a variety of substrates, including biocompatible substrates. They can be used to pattern non-planar substrates and to make three-dimensional microstructures.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH GM30367, NIH HL 57669, NIH CA 55833, NSF ECS 9729405, NSF DMR-98-09363 MRSEC, and by DARPA/ SPAWAR (Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego—the content of the information does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred). S.T. is a Leukemia Society of America Fellow and thanks the society for a fellowship.
References (88)
- et al.
A miniature microelectrode array to monitor the bioelectric activity of cultured cells
Exp Cell Res
(1972) Plasma-etched neural probes. Sens Actuators A
(1997)- et al.
Microelectrode arrays for stimulation of neural slice preparations
J Neurosci Methods
(1997) - et al.
Using microcontact printing to pattern the attachment of mammalian cells to self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on transparent films of gold and silver
Exp Cell Res
(1997) Preferential glial cell attachment to microcontact printed surfaces
J Neurosci Methods
(1997)- et al.
Regulation of protrusion shape and adhesion to the substratum during chemotactic responses of mammalian carcinoma cells
Exp Cell Res
(1998) - et al.
Micropatterned substratum adhesivenessa model for morphogenic cues controlling cell behavior
Exp Cell Res
(1992) Kinetics of bone cell organization and mineralization on materials with patterned surface chemistry
Biomaterials
(1996)- et al.
A versatile technique for patterning biomolecules onto glass coverslips
J Neurosci Methods
(1993) - et al.
Patterning of immobilized antibody layers via photolithography and oxygen plasma exposure
Biosens Bioelec
(1997)