Business process redesign: Radical and evolutionary change

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00008-8Get rights and content

Abstract

We explore the nature of change when firms engage in business process redesign (i.e., reengineering). According to the proponents, business process redesign is an all-or-nothing affair. Numerous books and articles on the topic promulgate the notion that reengineering is nothing short of a revolution. But the rhetoric can be daunting—and may mislead managers planning to reengineer their organizations. Our field research on 15 business process redesign projects suggests that only one of the two phases of reengineering effort needs to be revolutionary for the project to reach field implementation. Reengineering involves both the design—the blueprint for change—and the implementation of those plans. Reengineering design phase must have elements of radical change. The radicalness instills motivation in ways that more evolutionary projects cannot. But as companies implement the plans, they can—and many do—use a more evolutionary change process, and still gain effective results. Our results provide support to the emerging body of literature that argues that organizations combine evolutionary and radical change harmoniously.

References (33)

  • D. Leonard-Barton

    Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization

    Research Policy

    (1988)
  • M. Beer et al.

    Why Change Programs Don't Produce Change

    Harvard Business Review

    (November–December 1990)
  • J.R. Caron et al.

    Business Process Reengineering at CIGNA Corporation: Experiences and Lessons From the First Five Years

    MIS Quarterly

    (September 1995)
  • J. Champy

    Reengineering Management

    (1995)
  • E.K. Clemons

    Using Scenario Analysis to Manage the Risks of Reengineering

    Sloan Management Review

    (Summer 1995)
  • R. Cooper et al.

    Human Reengineering

    Sloan Management Review

    (Summer 1995)
  • T. Davenport

    Process Innovation

    (1993)
  • J.E. Ettlie et al.

    Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation

    Management Science

    (June 1984)
  • M.J. Gallivan et al.

    Implementing Radical Change: Gradual Versus Rapid Pace

  • C.J.G. Gersick

    Revolutionary Change Theories: A Multilevel Exploration of the Punctuated Equilibrium Paradigm

    Academy of Management Review

    (January 1991)
  • C.J.G. Gersick

    Pacing Strategic Change: The Case of a New Venture

    Academy of Management Journal

    (February 1994)
  • G. Hall et al.

    How to Make Reengineering Really Work

    Harvard Business Review

    (November–December 1993)
  • M. Hammer

    Reengineering Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate

    Harvard Business Review

    (July–August 1990)
  • M. Hammer et al.

    Reengineering the Corporation

    (1993)
  • M. Hammer et al.

    The Reengineering Revolution

    (1995)
  • T.D. Jick

    Managing Change: Cases and Concepts

    (1993)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text