Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section
Introduction
According to Abramovitz (1979, p. 5):
I think one can sense a mood of disappointment in the achievement and, indeed, of increasing opposition to rapid growth in the future …. Let me give just one rather revealing illustration. At Stanford University, we arrange a gathering each year for our graduates. They spend several days at the University listening to lectures and taking part in seminars. For some years now one of the most popular seminars has been entitled “the rat race”. Here, in the company of psychologists, sociologists, psychiatrists, etc. the graduates, young and old, conduct an inquest into their lives, and, as the title of the seminar suggests, the central question is why they find existence so frustrating, why they feel themselves on a treadmill.
Economic growth is the main goal of most modern states because of the belief that an increase in incomes leads to an increase in welfare. Economists generally assume that having more goods leads directly to greater overall welfare, but recent empirical work has raised doubts about this simple assumption. In particular, this recent work has suggested that a person’s subjective well-being (SWB) depends to a large degree on relative and not absolute income. As Easterlin (1995) suggests, “raising the incomes of all, does not increase the happiness of all, because the positive effect of higher income on SWB is offset by the negative effect of higher living level norms brought about by the growth in incomes generally” (p. 36).
If true, this conclusion raises serious questions concerning the relative importance of many of today’s current policies. If economic growth only has minor effects on well-being then should other social goals receive more attention? Should equality of incomes be a more prominent social goal? Would a reduction in inequality increase dynamic efficiency? What is the proper way to index poverty? These questions and others have been posed in the literature. The answers, however, depend on our understanding of the influence of relative-income on well-being, yet our understanding is limited since past studies have focused on aggregated time-series trends that cannot identify the underlying dynamics of the relative-income effects. The structure of these effects is thus left undetermined. This study seeks to fill this gap in our understanding of relative-income effects.
The structure of this paper is as follows. In Section 2 the key ideas about SWB are discussed and the past empirical work is reviewed. The purpose of this section is to illustrate the need for an individual-level approach to test for relative-income effects. Section 3 presents the relevant econometrics. The past studies focused on aggregate time-series, but cannot exactly identify the underlying relative-income effects. A dynamic econometric model is presented which can be used to overcome these problems and test for relative-income effects using an ideal set of data, which is described. Section 4 then discusses the actual (and less-than-ideal) cross-section data used and discusses how to adapt our methodology from Section 3 to the cross-section. Section 5 discusses the results of the application of our econometric model using the data. Section 6 replicates time-series from the cross-section estimates to illustrate the path of well-being by age cohort. Section 7 summarizes and discusses the results.
This paper does not attempt a comprehensive treatment of the determinants of happiness. Instead, the focus of this paper is on the identification of what is driving the seemingly contradictory time-series. In this respect, this paper makes four important contributions. First, it describes how the aggregated nature of the past work leaves open the true nature of the relative-income effects. Second, it describes a simple estimation strategy that overcomes these problems, while being based on established research from psychology and sociology. The key point is that in investigating the relative-income effects on SWB this study focuses on the individual level and uses relevant concepts from the literature within and outside of the field of economics. Third, this study uses this micro-based approach to find evidence in support of the hypothesis that relative-income does matter in individual assessments of SWB, although, there is indication that these effects may be smaller at low income levels. Fourth, this paper shows that the time series trends can be obtained from the underlying structure estimated on the cross-section. These contributions mark a step towards understanding the nature of SWB and provide direction for future theoretical and empirical work on the role of relative-income effects.
Section snippets
Subjective well-being
The basis of this investigation rests on the validity of the ‘SWB’ concept and measures. This concept, which is common in the sociology and psychology literature, refers to an individual’s personal assessment of his own well-being according to his own opinion and not some objective measure. Economists tend to ascribe well-being to objective measures like income and life-expectancy, but the SWB concept is notably different. First, SWB is subjective to the individual in question. Second, SWB is
Econometric issues
In this section, we first outline the theoretical difficulties in estimation of relative-income effects. Attention is given to the two immediate problems (Section 3.1): observational equivalence and lack of data on norms. Next, we link the theory to the empirics by describing the ‘ideal dataset’ and an econometric model that can be used to overcome the two problems (Section 3.2). Section 3 deals only with the ‘ideal’ and discussion of the cold realities of estimation will be postponed until the
The GSS data
We use 1994 general social survey (GSS) data to test for the presence of relative-income effects. The GSS is an annual survey of US households conducted by the National Opinion Research Center. The survey is conducted by personal interview of the respondents. These data and information about the survey are publicly available from the GSS web-site on the Internet.7 The GSS survey was chosen because it is publicly available and has SWB and other
Results
A cursory glance at Table 1 suggests that relative-income effects are important. The average (natural log) income of respondents that reported being very happy (SWB=2) is 10.356 and decreases as respondents report lower levels of happiness. This corresponds with the graph in column (a) of Fig. 2. Respondents whose parents’ standard of living was much higher than their own report lower SWB. This is seen because DPARSOL5 has mean 0.128 when SWB=0 and has mean 0.022 when SWB=2. As the respondents’
Back to the time series
Let us put the paper up to this point in perspective. First, looking at aggregate time-series does not tell us the underlying structure of the dynamics of happiness, so we must look at the individual level. Second, using the GSS cross-section data, we find support in favor of both internal and external influences on SWB. But now, let us bring the paper back to square one by replicating the time-series trend (of virtually constant average happiness) using the parameters identified off the
Summary and discussion
Recent literature has addressed the role that relative-income plays in individual assessments of subjective-well being. Focusing on the underlying identification, this study makes four important contributions to that literature. First, we illustrate the problem of aggregation with the past studies. This problem is characterized by observational equivalence, which makes it impossible to identify the underlying data generating process. Second, we describe and implement a simple estimation
Acknowledgements
Comments from Richard Easterlin were helpful. Special thanks to Mike Boozer for his many helpful comments, insights, and suggestions.
References (15)
Will increasing the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
(1995)- Abramovitz, M., 1979. Economic growth and its discontents. In: Boskin, M. (Ed.), Economics and Human Welfare: Essays in...
- Brickman, P., Campbell, D., 1971. Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In: Appley, M.H. (Ed.), Adaptation...
- Carroll, C., Overland, J., Weil, D., 1997. Comparison utility in a growth model. NBER Working Paper...
- Clark, B., 1991. Political Economy: A Comparative Approach. Praeger, Westport,...
Subjective well-being
Psychological Bulletin
(1984)- Duesenberry, J., 1949. Income, saving, and the theory of Consumer Behavior. Harvard University Press,...
Cited by (481)
Intra-couple comparison, intra-gender comparison and class identity of Chinese couples
2024, Research in Social Stratification and MobilityDoes targeted poverty alleviation policy lead to happy life? Evidence from rural China
2023, China Economic ReviewOptimal incentive contracts with a spiteful principal: Single agent
2023, Mathematical Social SciencesAnalyzing the relationship between income and life satisfaction of Forest farm households - a behavioral economics approach
2023, Forest Policy and EconomicsInequality aversion and government health expenditure
2023, European Journal of Political EconomyAre “desirable” cities really so desirable? City characteristics and subjective well-being in the U.S.
2023, Wellbeing, Space and Society