Elsevier

Solid State Ionics

Volume 145, Issues 1–4, 1 December 2001, Pages 69-78
Solid State Ionics

A thermodynamic approach to proton conductivity in acid-doped polybenzimidazole

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00915-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Conductivity measurement on films of acid-doped polybenzimidazole (PBI) was performed by impedance spectroscopy. A complete set of data for PBI–H3PO4 and PBI–H2SO4 complexes is reported as a function of temperature (30–90°C) and isostatic pressure (1–4000 bars). Experimental results indicate an activated mechanism for the proton migration. Isobar and isothermal conductivity data allow the determination of the characteristic thermodynamic parameters ΔV* (4–10 cm3 mol−1), ΔH* (0.6–1.1 eV) and ΔS* (40–190 J mol−1 K−1). The dependence of these parameters on temperature and pressure is consistent with thermodynamic predictions. Based on a previous IR spectroscopic study of PBI–acid complexes, a microscopic model is developed, suggesting proton transfer from one imide site to another in which the anionic species participate by a Grotthus mechanism.

Introduction

In the last 20 years, protonic conductive polymers have been extensively studied for potential applications as electrolytes in fuel cells, electrochromic devices and hydrogen sensors [1]. The more common systems are obtained by dissolving a strong acid (i.e. phosphoric and sulphuric acids) in polymer chains containing basic sites. A classification of these complexes as a function of the polymer backbone basicity has been proposed by Lassègues [2]. Among them, H3PO4 and H2SO4 doped polybenzimidazole (PBI) are of a particular interest due to their thermal stability: these complexes are stable up to 200°C. Above this temperature, the dissolved acid begins to decompose [3], whereas the macromolecular chains remain stable up to about 600°C.

PBI is made of linear macromolecular chains whose monomer unit is:

Pure PBI can be considered as an insulator with an intrinsic conductivity of about 10−12 S cm−1 at 25°C [4]. Its glass transition temperature, Tg, is estimated as 420°C [5] and below this temperature, PBI is purely amorphous and can be considered as an organic glass. A strong acid (i.e. H3PO4 or H2SO4) dissolved in the macromolecular chains leads to an important protonic conductivity. The previously published results on conductivity arise from measurements performed on samples prepared according to two different methods. In the first one, the samples are in equilibrium with acidic solutions [6], [7], while in the second, the water is eliminated by a heating treatment in order to keep only the acid molecules in the PBI polymer [8], [9]. One of the most interesting features is that the ‘anhydrous’ systems exhibit an important protonic conductivity of about 10−2 S cm−1 at 130°C associated with a good mechanical behavior [6]. These properties make PBI–H2SO4 or PBI–H3PO4 complexes very attractive candidates as electrolytes for fuel cells [10], [11] or electrochemical hydrogen sensors [12], [13].

We have shown [6] that in PBI–acid complexes, the protonic conductivity is greatly influenced by the anionic species. This point has been discussed in the literature for other polymer/acid complexes [14]. A high protonic conductivity is associated with the amphoteric character of the counter anions, HSO4 or H2PO4. The mechanism of this protonic migration is not yet established. The present work is an attempt to elucidate this mechanism using conductivity measurements of anhydrous mixtures of PBI–H3PO4 and PBI–H2SO4 as a function of temperature (30–90°C) and isostatic pressure (1–4000 bars).

Section snippets

Experimental

PBI (Mn=50 000) is commercially available as a solid powder from Hœchst Celanese. PBI films are prepared by dissolving the powder in dimethylacetamide (DMAc). The solution is then spread on a glass plate and the solvent is evaporated at 100°C for 5 h. Residual DMAc is removed by heating at 200°C for 2 h. Discs of about 15 mm diameter and 250–400 μm thickness are stamped out from these films. They are then doped by immersion for 10 h in phosphoric (85 wt.% in water) or sulphuric (80 wt.% in

Results

Conductivity (σ) measurements as a function of temperature (T) and pressure (P) were performed on two compositions with xH2SO4=0.63 and xH3PO4=0.63. For these compositions, at constant temperature, we observe linear variation of log(σ) as a function of pressure as shown in Fig. 2a and b. At each temperature, these variations, expressed as a reciprocal of pressure, allow to define a volume VT by the relationship:∂lnσP,TPT=−VTRT

Experimental values for VT as a function of composition and

Identification of experimental parameters

The experimental relationship (2) suggests an activated mechanism for protonic migration similar to the one currently developed for solid electrolytes or glasses [18]. A possible extension of this approach to acid-doped PBI could be that protonic charge carriers result from a partial dissociation of the acid AH into a solvated proton H+ on an acceptor site and its counter anion A (A=HSO4 or H2PO4). The solvated proton migrates then from one site to another. The protonic conductivity σ+

Conclusion

Conductivity measurements, as a function of temperature and pressure, were performed on polybenzimidazole-doped by a strong acid, AH. Two sets of measurements are of particular interest because they are related to the same concentration in two different acids H3PO4 and H2SO4. Experimental results show the role of the anions A for the protonic transport process. Conductivity measurements indicate that in the investigated temperature range, the proton migration proceeds by an activated

Acknowledgements

One of the authors (J.L. Souquet) thanks Prof. B V.R. Chowdari and Dr. H.J. Lindner for their hospitality at the Institute of Material Research and Engineering of Singapore while contributing to this work.

References (26)

  • G. Inzelt et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2000)
  • R. Bouchet et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1999)
  • M. Kawahara et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2000)
  • J.C. Lassègues et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1989)
  • J.J. Fontanella et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1998)
  • Th. Dippel et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1993)
  • S. Lansiart et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. Solids

    (1975)
  • Y. Oyama et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1992)
  • G. Alberti et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1999)
  • V.H. Schmidt et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1999)
  • M. Gargouri et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1999)
  • J.C. Lassègues
  • S.R. Samms et al.

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text