Effect of anisotropy on morphological instability in the freezing of a hypercooled melt
References (29)
- et al.
Effect of anisotropic thermal conductivity on the morphological stability of a binary alloy
J. Crystal Growth
(1990) - et al.
The effect of the anisotropy of surface tension and interface kinetics on morphological instability
J. Crystal Growth
(1976) - et al.
Anisotropic interface kinetics and tilted cells in unidirectional solidification
J. Crystal Growth
(1987) - et al.
Effect of surface tension anisotropy on cellular morphologies
J. Crystal Growth
(1988) Overview 98. II — Mean curvature and weighed mean curvature
Acta Metall. Mater.
(1992)- et al.
Relative roles of heat transport and interface rearrangement rates in the rapid growth of crystals in undercooled melt
Acta Metall.
(1982) - et al.
Investigation of solid/liquid interface temperatures via isenthalpic solidification
J. Cryst. Growth
(1967) - et al.
Kinetics and shape of crystal growth from the melt for substances with low values
J. Cryst. Growth
(1974) - et al.
Stability and periodic waves governed by the modified Kawahara equation
Physica D
(1995) - et al.
Laminarizing effect of dispersion in an active-dissipative nonlinear medium
Physica D
(1993)
Role of instabilities in determination of the shapes of growing crystals
J. Cryst. Growth
Morphological stability of a particle growing by diffusion or heat flow
J. Appl. Phys.
Stability of a planar interface during solidification of a dulite binary alloy
J. Appl. Phys.
Morphological instability
Cited by (27)
Interactive effects of interfacial energy anisotropy and solute transport on solidification patterns of Al-Cu alloys
2022, Acta MaterialiaCitation Excerpt :The instability of CM interface, which is influenced by the CM interfacial energy, controls microstructure evolution, dendrite arm spacing, and microsegregation patterns [3]. Coriell and Sekerka [12] added surface tension and surface kinetic anisotropy effects into the perturbation linear stability analysis and showed that the capillary term, that contributes in interface stability, is direction dependent [9,13,14]. Trivedi [15] compared experimental results with linear and weakly nonlinear analyses of the planar interface stability and showed that when a material is directionally solidified beyond the threshold of planar stability condition [16], the anisotropy of interface properties not only affects the planar to cellular and cellular to dendritic transitions, but also causes tilting of cells and dendrites against the heat flow direction [17–19].
Stability of a sharp uniaxial-isotropic phase interface
2009, Journal of Colloid and Interface ScienceTemperature distribution in front of the liquid-solid interface in the undercooled pure melt influenced by a transverse far field flow
2007, Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing: Mineral Metallurgy Materials (Eng Ed)Planar front instabilities during directional solidification of hcp: Zn-Cd dilute alloys
2006, Scripta MaterialiaNonlinear morphological control of growing crystals
2005, Physica D: Nonlinear PhenomenaCitation Excerpt :This is particularly evident for crystal growth problems where it has been recognized that growth morphologies are determined by the interaction between macroscopic driving forces (applied supercooling or far-field flux) and microscopic interfacial forces (surface tension, kinetics of atomic attachment, anisotropies, etc.) and their associated time scales. The interaction among these forces produces complex morphologies including dendrites and side-branches, which have been extensively studied theoretically (e.g. [2–18]) and experimentally (e.g. [26–31]). The complex morphologies are a result of the Mullins-Sekerka instability.
Numerical simulation of anisotropic surface diffusion with curvature-dependent energy
2005, Journal of Computational Physics