Effect of anisotropy on morphological instability in the freezing of a hypercooled melt

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(97)00297-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Considered is the morphological instability of a rapid-solidification front propagating in a hypercooled melt when the solidification process is controlled by kinetics and there are cubic anisotropies of surface tension and attachment kinetics. It is shown that, due to anisotropy, the threshold of morphological instability depends on the direction of the crystal growth and generates, in the general case, traveling cells (waves) propagating on the solidification front in a preferred direction determined by the anisotropy coefficients. Weakly nonlinear analysis of the waves is carried out in the vicinity of the instability threshold and it is shown that the evolution of the waves is usually governed by an anisotropic dissipation-modified Korteweg-de Vries equation. In special cases it is governed by an anisotropic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation that describes stationary cells. Regions in the parameter space are found where the stationary and traveling cells are stable and could be observed in experiment. The characteristics of the cells are studied as functions of the direction of the crystal growth.

References (29)

  • R.F. Sekerka

    Role of instabilities in determination of the shapes of growing crystals

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (1993)
  • W.W. Mullins et al.

    Morphological stability of a particle growing by diffusion or heat flow

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1963)
  • W.W. Mullins et al.

    Stability of a planar interface during solidification of a dulite binary alloy

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1964)
  • S.R. Coriell et al.

    Morphological instability

  • Cited by (27)

    • Interactive effects of interfacial energy anisotropy and solute transport on solidification patterns of Al-Cu alloys

      2022, Acta Materialia
      Citation Excerpt :

      The instability of CM interface, which is influenced by the CM interfacial energy, controls microstructure evolution, dendrite arm spacing, and microsegregation patterns [3]. Coriell and Sekerka [12] added surface tension and surface kinetic anisotropy effects into the perturbation linear stability analysis and showed that the capillary term, that contributes in interface stability, is direction dependent [9,13,14]. Trivedi [15] compared experimental results with linear and weakly nonlinear analyses of the planar interface stability and showed that when a material is directionally solidified beyond the threshold of planar stability condition [16], the anisotropy of interface properties not only affects the planar to cellular and cellular to dendritic transitions, but also causes tilting of cells and dendrites against the heat flow direction [17–19].

    • Stability of a sharp uniaxial-isotropic phase interface

      2009, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
    • Temperature distribution in front of the liquid-solid interface in the undercooled pure melt influenced by a transverse far field flow

      2007, Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing: Mineral Metallurgy Materials (Eng Ed)
    • Nonlinear morphological control of growing crystals

      2005, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is particularly evident for crystal growth problems where it has been recognized that growth morphologies are determined by the interaction between macroscopic driving forces (applied supercooling or far-field flux) and microscopic interfacial forces (surface tension, kinetics of atomic attachment, anisotropies, etc.) and their associated time scales. The interaction among these forces produces complex morphologies including dendrites and side-branches, which have been extensively studied theoretically (e.g. [2–18]) and experimentally (e.g. [26–31]). The complex morphologies are a result of the Mullins-Sekerka instability.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text