Downwind numbering: robust multigrid for convection-diffusion problems
References (32)
Local mesh refinement in 2 and 3 dimensions
Impact Comput. Sci. Engrg.
(1991)A multigrid method for multiprocessors
Appl. Math. Comput.
(1986)Linear iterations as smoothers in multigrid methods
Impact Comput. Sci. Engrg.
(1989)- et al.
The hierarchical basis multigrid method
SC-87-2
(1987) PLTMG: A Software Package for Solving Elliptic Partial Differential Equations. Users Guide 6.0
(1990)Locally refined solution of unsymmetric and nonlinear problems
Parallele adaptive Mehrgitterverfahren
- et al.
Additive and multiplicative multigrid—a comparison
- et al.
Adaptivity and robustness
- et al.
On robust and adaptive multigrid methods
Tetrahedral grid refinement
Computing
Convergence estimates for multigrid algorithms without regularity assumptions
Math. Comp.
Parallel multilevel preconditioners
Math. Comp.
Multi-level adaptive solution to boundary-value problems
Math. Comp.
Error estimates and automatic time step control for non-linear parabolic problems
SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
Ein Relaxationsverfahren zur Lösung elliptischer Differentialgleichungen
Zh. Vychisl. Mat. i Mat. Fiz.
Cited by (52)
A high resolution Physics-informed neural networks for high-dimensional convection–diffusion–reaction equations
2023, Applied Soft ComputingAn extremum-preserving finite volume scheme for convection-diffusion equation on general meshes
2020, Applied Mathematics and ComputationCitation Excerpt :Therefore, a reliable extremum-preserving scheme is needed for the numerical simulation of convection-diffusion equation. Some effective numerical schemes have been developed for the convection-diffusion equation to solve the convection-dominated problem [4–8]. These schemes only can be used on the regular meshes and don’t satisfy the discrete extremum principle.
High-order implicit palindromic discontinuous Galerkin method for kinetic-relaxation approximation
2019, Computers and FluidsCitation Excerpt :This kind of ideas is mentioned in several works. See for instance in [7,15,34,37,45]. In a recent work, we have evaluated the parallel scalability of the triangular solver [6].
Optimizing a multigrid Runge–Kutta smoother for variable-coefficient convection–diffusion equations
2017, Linear Algebra and Its ApplicationsCitation Excerpt :The unsteady case is much more difficult and the multigrid strategy tuned on the steady case deteriorates dramatically, when moving to the unsteady setting. In this direction see, e.g., the works in [3,4], in which a coarsening that “follows” the flow, thus producing flow related aggregates, is used, or the works in [5–7], in which multigrid solvers for the convection–diffusion equation are investigated, both on the smoothing and on the coarsening side. As already mentioned, in the constant coefficient case, this issue is considered in [1], with the use of a specific class of smoothers based on explicit Runge–Kutta methods, which show low storage requirements and scale well in parallel: the tuning of a number of parameters makes the whole strategy very fast and efficient.
Variational space–time elements for large-scale systems
2017, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and EngineeringCitation Excerpt :Space–time problems are only first order in time direction and they can be considered as the limit of singularly perturbed diffusion–reaction problems. For this class of operators, multigrid solvers are known not to perform efficiently [54–57]. The main problem is that standard finite element methods provide matrices that are not M-matrices, and hence do not preserve the positivity and monotonicity properties of the solution.
A geometric multigrid preconditioning strategy for DPG system matrices
2017, Computers and Mathematics with Applications