A hedonic valuation of urban green areas
Introduction
Green areas perform important environmental and recreational functions as outlined by Costanza et al. (1997). It is well known that forest and green plants absorb atmospheric carbon, they maintain a certain degree of humidity in the atmosphere, regulate rainfall, moderate the temperatures, restrain soil erosion and they also form the basis for the conservation of fauna and flora. Recreational activities based on enjoying the contact with nature are becoming increasingly widespread. Urban parks, although on a smaller scale, also carry out the same environmental and recreational functions as forest and green areas.
In the cities, the main environmental function performed by gardens and parks is to absorb carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. These emissions come mainly from the use of private vehicles in urban transport and have increased considerably during recent decades.1 The Ministerio de Medio Ambiente (2000) estimates that each inhabitant in a big city generates on average 3.3 annual tonnes of CO2. Taking into account that one hectare of Mediterranean forest can absorb around 3.7 tonnes of carbon dioxide per year, a simple calculation leads us to conclude we need almost a hectare of forest per inhabitant to absorb the contamination caused by these emissions. The conservation of urban green areas therefore becomes indispensable to curb the growing contamination of our cities.
To the environmental functions of urban green parks, further factors should be added such as those of acoustic isolation since some gardens work as an acoustic screen between traffic roads and residential areas. Plants have individual and collective aesthetic value, playing an important role in the conservation of a pleasant landscape, being sometimes the link between residential urban areas and industrial areas. City parks and gardens are also the setting for many recreational activities (children’s play areas, walking, jogging, etc.). All these services offered by urban green areas explain the influence of environmental variables on the prices of dwellings.
However, the economic valuation of the urban green areas benefits is not immediate as, from an economic point of view, these services are public goods without a market price. Their lack of value, expressed in monetary terms, prevents these open spaces from being properly considered in the cost-benefit analyses of public urban planning policies. As a consequence, we run the risk of urban green areas endowments falling below the social optimum.
Economic science has developed specific methods to capture the value of environmental assets in monetary units. This value is calculated, sometimes indirectly, by observing individuals’ behavior, such as in the travel cost method. Other methods, such as contingent valuation, obtain the value of the environmental asset by directly asking people how much they would be willing to pay for its use or conservation. This last method is extremely versatile and has been applied to value urban planning projects such as the construction of a by-pass in Barcelona (Riera, 1993), the waterfront renewal in Valencia (Del Saz et al., 1999) or the conversion of dock land into a leisure area in Castellón (Del Saz et al., 2000).
Another approach for estimating the monetary value of an environmental asset is that of hedonic prices. In this case, the value is indirectly obtained through the influence exercised by the environment on the market price of another good. This methodology is applied in this paper to value urban green areas in the city of Castellón (Spain). A representative sample of the current real estate market in this city was selected. The data set contains the sale price and other key features of 810 residential dwellings. Together with conventional determinants of housing prices (size, number of rooms, age, etc.) certain environmental factors were included such as proximity to a green area, its size and the existence or absence of views of a garden or a public park.
In the following sections of the paper, the theoretical foundations of the method, the empirical models used and the results obtained will be explained.
Section snippets
Theoretical foundations of the hedonic prices method
Griliches (1971) and Rosen (1974) provided the theoretical support for the development of the hedonic models although, according to Colwell and Dilmore (1999), the origins of this methodology may possibly be found in previous works.
The method of the hedonic prices relates the market price of a certain good with the characteristics that define it, thus enabling the monetary value of each characteristic to be calculated by observing the differences in the market price of commodities sharing the
Empirical models
The relationship between the selling price and the characteristics of the housing (living area, number of rooms, age, distance from a landscaped area, etc.) can take several functional forms. In the present work, three specifications (linear, logarithmic and reciprocal) are considered.
Conclusions
We have estimated a hedonic price function of dwellings in which the sale price is related with the endowments of urban green areas in the city. Together with a set of conventional explanatory variables, three environmental variables were included in the right-hand side of the regression: the existence of views of a garden or a public park, the size of the nearest green area and the distance of the housing from the green space. The results show that the main variable influencing the price is
References (24)
- et al.
The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon
J. Environ. Manage.
(2000) - et al.
A forecast comparison of residential housing prices by parametric versus semiparametric conditional mean estimators
Econ. Lett.
(1996) The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in The Netherlands
Landsc. Urban Plann.
(2000)- et al.
Property prices and urban forest amenities
J. Environ. Econ. Manage.
(2000) - Bilbao, C., 2000. Cálculo del beneficio para los consumidores derivado de una mejora medioambiental. In: III Encuentro...
- et al.
The impact of public school attributes on home sale prices in California
Growth Change
(2000) - et al.
Who was first? An examination of an early hedonic study
Land Econ.
(1999) - et al.
The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital
Nature
(1997) - et al.
On the choice of functional forms for hedonic price functions
Rev. Econ. Stat.
(1988) - Del Saz, S., Garcı́a, L., Palau, J.M., 1999. Los beneficios sociales de la remodelación urbanı́stica de la fachada...
The effect of residential investment on nearby property values: evidence from Cleveland, Ohio
J. Real Estate Res.
Cited by (342)
Is it possible to create a unified urban greenery management system (UGMS) on a national scale? The concept for EU Member State of Poland
2023, Environmental Science and PolicyDetermining the optimal land valuation model: A case study of Hanoi, Vietnam
2023, Land Use PolicyValuing urban trees: A hedonic investigation into tree canopy influence on property values across environmental and social contexts in Baltimore, Maryland
2023, Urban Forestry and Urban GreeningAir quality affects house prices — Analysis based on RD of the Huai River policy
2022, Sustainable Cities and SocietyUrban parks, value uplift and green gentrification: An application of the spatial hedonic model in the city of Brisbane
2022, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening