Culture of organized cell communities

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(98)00017-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Cells cultured in vitro will tend to retain their differentiated phenotype under conditions that resemble their natural in vivo environment, for example, when cultured on polymer scaffolds in tissue culture bioreactors. In this chapter, we define organized cell communities as three-dimensional in vitro grown cell–polymer constructs that display important structural and functional features of the natural tissue. We review representative studies in which the research goal was to culture organized cell communities resembling cartilage, bone, skeletal muscle or cardiac-like tissue. These constructs can potentially serve as tissue equivalents for in vivo transplantation or as a model system for the in vitro testing of cell and tissue-level responses to molecular, mechanical or genetic manipulations.

Introduction

The loss of a tissue or its function due to congenital defects, disease or trauma is one of the most difficult, frequent and costly problems in human medicine [52]. Current treatment modalities include autografts (e.g. skin, blood vessels), allografts (e.g. heart, kidney transplants) and artificial prostheses (e.g. joints, heart valves). However, each of the above methods has its limitations, which include shortage of donor tissue, immune rejection and pathogen transfer, and limited service life, respectively. The advent of tissue engineering has been motivated by the challenge to produce tissue substitutes that can restore the structural features and physiological functions of natural tissues in vivo [55].

There have been two basic approaches to tissue engineering: (a) in vitro cultivation of cell–polymer constructs for in vivo implantation and (b) direct in vivo implantation of isolated cells and/or biomaterials. We will discuss only the former category here, i.e. tissue constructs obtained by growing isolated cells on polymer scaffolds using various in vitro tissue culture bioreactors. We will define an organized cell community as an in vitro grown construct that displays important structural and functional characteristics of a natural tissue.

In addition to serving as tissue equivalents for clinical transplantation, organized cell communities can be used for in vitro studies of normal or pathological tissue function. In particular, constructs based on either normal or genetically engineered cells can be used to study cell differentiation and tissue formation under well controlled conditions, assess tissue responses to biochemical and mechanical stimuli and identify the functions of specific genes or gene products that can be either over-expressed or knocked-out. Organized cell communities thus represent a model system for the direct testing of cell and tissue-level responses to molecular, mechanical or genetic manipulations.

In the following review, we will discuss representative examples of organized cell communities as well as the effects of environmental factors on in vivo and in vitro tissue development.

Section snippets

Representative cultures of organized cell communities

Representative studies in which the research goal was to create in vitro a three-dimensional (3D) equivalent of cartilage, bone, skeletal muscle or cardiac muscle are listed in Table 1. These four tissue types were selected because the feasibility of culturing organized communities of their component cells has recently been demonstrated by independent research groups, and because their successful engineering is expected to have a major clinical impact. Several key parameters varied greatly from

Effects of environmental factors on tissue formation in vivo and in vitro

The structures and functions of cells, tissues and organs within the human body are in part determined by environmental factors. It is likely that the same factors that affect in vivo tissue development, maintenance and remodeling are important during the in vitro culture of organized cell communities. The selected examples described above (Section 2) suggest that at least two sets of factors can influence cell growth and differentiation in vitro: (1) scaffold-related factors, including spatial

Conclusion and future research directions

Over the last ten years, much progress has been made in the in vitro culture of organized cell communities for potential use as implants and/or studies of normal and pathological tissue function. This progress is due both to an improved understanding of in vivo tissue growth and the use of 3D scaffolds in conjunction with bioreactors to regenerate tissue equivalents from isolated cells.

We considered organized cell communities to be in vitro-grown 3D constructs that displayed important

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Grant No. NAG9-836).

References (95)

  • M.J Yaszemski et al.

    Evolution of bone transplantation: molecular, cellular and tissue strategies to engineer human bone

    Biomaterials

    (1996)
  • J Abbot et al.

    The loss of phenotypic traits by differentiated cells

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1966)
  • C.W Archer et al.

    Phenotypic modulation in sub-populations of human articular chondrocytes in vitro

    J. Cell Sci.

    (1990)
  • C Bassleer et al.

    Human chondrocytes in tridimensional culture

    In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.

    (1986)
  • D Benayahu et al.

    Mineralization of marrow–stromal osteoblasts MBA-15 on three-dimensional carriers

    Calcif. Tissue Int.

    (1994)
  • F. Berthiaume, J. Frangos, Effects of flow on anchorage-dependent mammalian cell-secreted products, in: J. Frangos...
  • M Brittberg et al.

    Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (1994)
  • J.P Brockes

    Amphibian limb regeneration: rebuilding a complex structure

    Science

    (1997)
  • P Bruckner et al.

    Induction and prevention of chondrocyte hypertrophy in culture

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1989)
  • J.A Buckwalter et al.

    Articular cartilage, part I: tissue design and chondrocyte–matrix interactions

    J. Bone Joint Surg.

    (1997)
  • J.A Buckwalter et al.

    Articular cartilage, part II: degeneration and osteoarthrosis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation

    J. Bone Joint Surg.

    (1997)
  • P.M Bursac et al.

    Mass transfer studies of tissue engineered cartilage

    Tissue Engineering

    (1996)
  • N. Bursac, M. Papadaki, R.J. Cohen, F.J. Schoen, S.R. Eisenberg, R. Carrier, G. Vunjak-Novakovic, L.E. Freed. Cardiac...
  • M.D Buschmann et al.

    Chondrocytes in agarose culture synthesize a mechanically functional extracellular matrix

    J. Orthop. Res.

    (1992)
  • M Casser-Bette et al.

    Bone formation by osteoblast-like cells in a three-dimensional cell culture

    Calcif. Tissue Int.

    (1990)
  • R.S Cherry et al.

    Physical mechanisms of cell damage in microcarrier cell culture bioreactors

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (1988)
  • R.L Duncan et al.

    Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain

    Calcif. Tissue Int.

    (1995)
  • N.S Dunkelman et al.

    Cartilage production by rabbit articular chondrocytes on polyglycolic acid scaffolds in a closed bioreactor system

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (1995)
  • T Eschenhagen et al.

    Three-dimensional reconstitution of embryonic cardiomyocytes in a collagen matrix: a new heart muscle model system

    FASEB J.

    (1997)
  • J Folkman et al.

    Role of cell shape in growth control

    Nature

    (1978)
  • R.P Franke et al.

    Induction of human vascular endothelial stress fibers by fluid shear stress

    Nature

    (1984)
  • E.J Frazza et al.

    A new absorbable suture

    J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Symp.

    (1971)
  • L.E Freed et al.

    Neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo using cells cultured on synthetic biodegradable polymers

    J Biomed. Mater. Res.

    (1993)
  • L.E Freed et al.

    Cultivation of cell–polymer cartilage implants in bioreactors

    J. Cell. Biochem.

    (1993)
  • L.E Freed et al.

    Biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering

    Bio/Technology

    (1994)
  • L.E Freed et al.

    Composition of cell–polymer cartilage implants

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (1994)
  • L.E Freed et al.

    Kinetics of chondrocyte growth in cell–polymer implants

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (1994)
  • L.E. Freed, G. Vunjak-Novakovic, Tissue engineering of cartilage, in: J.D. Bronzino (Ed.), The Biomedical Engineering...
  • L.E Freed et al.

    Cultivation of cell–polymer constructs in simulated microgravity

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (1995)
  • L.E. Freed, G. Vunjak-Novakovic, Tissue culture bioreactors: chondrogenesis as a model system, in: R.P. Lanza, R....
  • L.E Freed et al.

    Microgravity tissue engineering

    In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.

    (1997)
  • L.E Freed et al.

    Tissue engineering of cartilage in space

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1997)
  • K.J. Gooch, T. Blunk, C.J. Tennant, G. Vunjak-Novakovic, R. Langer, L.E. Freed, Mechanical forces and growth factors...
  • D.A Grande et al.

    Evaluation of matrix scaffolds for tissue engineering of cartilage grafts

    J. Biomed. Mater. Res.

    (1997)
  • A.J. Grodzinsky, R.D. Kamm, D.A. Lauffenburger, Quantitative aspects of tissue engineering: basic issues in kinetics,...
  • J.P Gunter et al.

    Internal stabilization of autogenous rib cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: a barrier to cartilage warping

    Plast. Reconstr. Surg.

    (1997)
  • J.B Gurdon

    A community effect in animal development

    Nature

    (1988)
  • Cited by (210)

    • Halloysite nanoclay reinforced hydroxyapatite porous scaffold for hard tissue regeneration

      2023, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
    • Alginate as a versatile polymer matrix with biomedical and food applications

      2019, Materials for Biomedical Engineering: Absorbable Polymers
    • Resorbable biomaterials: Role of chitosan as a graft in bone tissue engineering

      2019, Materials for Biomedical Engineering: Nanobiomaterials in Tissue Engineering
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text