Visualizing and quantifying natural selection

doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89117-X

Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Volume 10, Issue 8, August 1995, Pages 313-318

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89117-X Get rights and content

Abstract

Modern methods of analysis are enabling researchers to study natural selection at a new level of detail. Multivariate statistical techniques can Identify specific targets of selection and provide parameter estimates that fit into equations for evolutionary change. A more Intuitive understanding of the form of selection can be provided through graphical representation of selection surfaces. Combinations of quantitative and visual analyses are providing researchers with new insights into the details of natural selection in the wild.

References (37)

KingsolverJ.G. et al.
Trends Ecol Evol.
(1991)
EndlerJ.A.
Natural Selection in the Wild
(1986)
ManlyB.F.J.
The Statistics of Natural Selection
(1985)
WadeM.J. et al.
Evolution
(1990)
LandeR. et al.
Evolution
(1983)
WadeM.J.
PhillipsP.C. et al.
Evolution
(1989)
SchluterD. et al.
Am. Nat.
(1994)
SchluterD.
Evolution
(1988)
Mitchell-OldsT. et al.
Evolution
(1987)

Brodie, E.D., III and Janzen, F.J. Evolution (in...

GrafenA.

LandeR.

ArnoldS.J. et al.

Evolution

(1984)

CrowJ.F.

Hum. Biol.

(1958)

WadeM.J.

Am. Nat.

(1979)

ArnoldS.J.

PriceT.D. et al.

Nature

(1984)

Cited by (510)

Climate fluctuations influence variation in group size in a cooperative bird
2022, Current Biology
Citation Excerpt :
Our study period (2007–2019) encompassed two El Niño episodes, two La Niña episodes, and 7 years of weak to moderate ENSO conditions as defined by NOAA.29 We used a multivariate modeling approach to ask how several candidate predictors (including climate, group size, and interactions between climate and group size) affected nest predation risk, nestling survival, and overall individual reproductive output, and we used linear regression of group size on individual reproductive output to estimate directional selection coefficients for two aspects of group size (the number of breeding pairs and the number of non-breeding helpers) for each year of the study.7,30 We found that the distribution of group sizes was stable across years and did not vary with climate, despite variation in annual precipitation (Figure S1).
Variation in group size is ubiquitous in social animals, but explaining the range of group sizes seen in nature remains challenging.1, 2, 3 Group-living species occur most frequently in climatically unpredictable environments, such that the costs and benefits of sociality may change from year to year.4, 5, 6 It is, therefore, possible that variation in climate may help to maintain a range of group sizes, but this hypothesis is rarely tested empirically.⁷^,⁸ Here, we examine selection on breeding group size in the greater ani (Crotophaga major), a tropical bird that nests in cooperative groups containing multiple co-breeders and non-breeding helpers.⁹ We found that larger groups experience lower nest predation (due to cooperative nest defense) but suffer higher nestling starvation (due to intra-clutch competition). Long-term data revealed that the relative magnitude of these costs and benefits depends on climate, with frequent changes across years in the strength and direction of selection on group size. In wet years, individual reproductive success was higher in large groups than in small groups, whereas the opposite was true in dry years. This was partly a consequence of competition among nestlings in large clutches, which suffered significantly higher mortality in dry years than in wet years. Averaged over the 13-year study period, annual reproductive success was approximately equal for females in small and large groups. These results suggest that temporal changes in the direction of selection may help explain the persistence of a range of group sizes and that a full understanding of the selective pressures shaping sociality requires long-term fitness data.
Comparative sexual selection in field and laboratory in a guild of sepsid dung flies
2021, Animal Behaviour
Citation Excerpt :
We performed a separate Procrustes transformation for each species and trait and calculated fore femur and wing centroid size as our estimate of the overall structural size. We calculated separate standardized univariate linear (βuni) and corresponding nonlinear (γuni) selection coefficients (here mating differentials) for fore femur size and wing size (following Lande & Arnold, 1983; Arnold & Wade, 1984a,b; Brodie et al., 1995), separately for field and laboratory. Corresponding bivariate selection coefficients were also calculated, but because leg and wing (centroid) size of an individual are highly collinear these are not reliable and hence not reported (see Baur et al., 2020).
Phenomenological and behavioural studies have greatly advanced the study of natural selection. Field studies of selection well appraise the natural situation, but is this also true for laboratory studies, which are typically more mechanistic? We compared precopulatory sexual selection (mating differential based on pairing success) in field and laboratory of several closely related, ecologically similar black scavenger dung flies (Diptera: Sepsidae). Selection on fore femur (sexual trait) and wing size (nonsexual trait) and shape varied considerably among seven species and continental populations in agreement with variation in their mating system and sexual size dimorphism. Selection on trait size was mostly positive or nil, but never significantly negative, implying mating advantages of large males in most species. Strongest selection was found in species/populations with male-biased size dimorphism, associating evolutionary shifts from female- to male-biased dimorphism with intensified sexual selection for large male size by adding male –male competition to a mating system previously driven primarily by female choice. Although sexual selection on shape was closely aligned with allometric shape variation, selection on fore femur shape was more consistent than selection on wing shape, which was absent in most species. Sexual selection intensities, but not necessarily the underlying behavioural mechanisms, were overall similar in field and laboratory, suggesting that laboratory assessments well represent the natural situation. If this conclusion can be generalized, it would lend credence to the strategy of using controlled laboratory mating studies to better understand natural selection, behaviour and ecology, at least for smaller animals that can be held in captivity.
Sex-specific heritabilities for length at maturity among Pacific salmonids and their consequences for evolution in response to artificial selection
2023, Evolutionary Applications
Artificial selection, whether intentional or coincidental, is a common result of conservation policies and natural resource management. To reduce unintended consequences of artificial selection, conservation practitioners must understand both artificial selection gradients on traits of interest and how those traits are correlated with others that may affect population growth and resilience. We investigate how artificial selection on male body size in Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) may influence the evolution of female body size and female fitness. While salmon hatchery managers often assume that selection for large males will also produce large females, this may not be the case—in fact, because the fastest‐growing males mature earliest and at the smallest size, and because female age at maturity varies little, small males may produce larger females if the genetic architecture of growth rate is the same in both sexes. We explored this possibility by estimating sex‐specific heritability values of and natural and artificial selection gradients on length at maturity in four populations representing three species of Pacific salmon. We then used the multivariate breeder's equation to project how artificial selection against small males may affect the evolution of female length and fecundity. Our results indicate that the heritability of length at maturity is greater within than between the sexes and that sire–daughter heritability values are especially small. Salmon hatchery policies should consider these sex‐specific quantitative genetic parameters to avoid potential unintended consequences of artificial selection.
Sexually concordant selection on floral traits despite greater opportunity for selection through male fitness
2024, New Phytologist
Effects of density on the strength of sexual selection in the laboratory and in nature
2023, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Reproductive resilience or sweepstakes recruitment? Assessing drivers of lifetime reproductive success in exploited marine fish
2023, Fish and Fisheries

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Visualizing and quantifying natural selection

Abstract

Trends Ecol Evol.

Natural Selection in the Wild

The Statistics of Natural Selection

Evolution

Evolution

Evolution

Am. Nat.

Evolution

Evolution

Evolution

Hum. Biol.

Am. Nat.

Nature