Article
Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(87)80020-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition, according to which primary nodes or reference points anchor distinct regions in cognitive space, brings together certain frequently reported apparent properties of mental maps: the regionalization and hierarchical organization of cognitive space, and the active role of salient cues in structuring spatial cognition. After a brief overview of the state of the art in cognitive mapping research, the anchor-point hypothesis is first explored conceptually, and then one particular version of it, the ‘tectonic plates’ hypothesis, is made operational. For that second part of the study, cognitive configurations derived from five subjects selected from a larger sample taken in Goleta, California are analyzed using three different methods, and features transcending any method-specific biases are identified. Although not entirely unambiguous, these first results seem encouraging and warrant further research in this direction.

References (46)

  • BurroughsW.J. et al.

    Asymmetries in distance cognition

    Geographical Analysis

    (1979)
  • CadwalladerM.

    Problems in cognitive distance and their implications for cognitive mapping

    Environment and Behavior

    (1979)
  • CohenR. et al.

    Cognitive maps of a naturalistic setting

    Child Development

    (1978)
  • GaleN.

    Some applications of computer cartography to the study of cognitive configurations

    Professional Geographer

    (1982)
  • GaleN. et al.

    Anchors and errors in cognitive images

  • GaleN. et al.

    Measuring spatial familiarity

  • GolledgeR.G.
  • GolledgeR.G.

    Learning about urban environments

  • GolledgeR.G.

    An anchor point theory of the acquisition of spatial knowledge and some empirical observations

  • GolledgeR.G.

    Environmental cognition

  • GolledgeR.G. et al.

    Some comments on non-euclidean mental maps

    Environment and Planning

    (1982)
  • GolledgeR.G. et al.

    Comparing objective and cognitive representations of environmental cues

  • Cited by (270)

    • The timescape of the city: Example of spatial interactions based on big data

      2023, Habitat International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Along this trajectory there are locations (stations in the time-geographic terminology) of various significance and purpose. In this respect, the anchor point theory (Golledge & Spector, 1978; Couclelis et al., 1987) identify locations of primary (home, work/school) and secondary (shopping, leisure facilities, etc.) importance to which much of the time-space existence of an individual is anchored. Together with the principle of return (Hägerstrand, 1985; Lenntorp, 1976) the anchor points help identify routine activities in human lives on particularly daily, but also weekly, monthly and seasonal basis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    This research was partially supported by Grant #SES84-07160 from the National Science Foundation.

    View full text