Optimal disassembly configurations for single and multiple products
References (27)
- et al.
A Key Issue in Product Life Cycle: Disassembly
Annals of the CIRP
(1993) - et al.
Design for Assembly and Disassembly
Annals of the CIRP
(1992) - et al.
Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing: A State-of-the-Art Survey
Journal of Mfg. Systems
(1997) - et al.
Disassembly Sequences for Objects Built from Unit Cubes
Computer-Aided Design
(1993) - et al.
The Strategic and Competitive Implications of Recycling and Design for Disassembly in the Electronics Industry
Salvageability by Design
IEEE Spectrum
(Aug. 1994)Costing the Earth
(1993)Environmental Consciousness: A Strategic Competitiveness Issue for the Electronics and Computer Industry
(1993)Green Design: An Introduction to Issues and Challenges
IEEE Trans. on Components, Packaging and Mfg. Technology Part A
(1994)The Life Cycle Concept as a Basis for Sustainable Industrial Production
Annals of the CIRP
(1993)
Industrial Ecology
A Cost-Benefit Analysis Model of Product Design for Recyclability and its Application
IEEE Trans. on Components, Packaging and Mfg. Technology Part A
The Recycling of Electronic Scrap
Cited by (50)
Disassembly line balancing under high variety of end of life states using a joint precedence graph approach
2015, Journal of Manufacturing SystemsCitation Excerpt :LB was first considered in assembly settings but the approach can be extended to the application of disassembly [2,3]. Meacham et al. [4] determined the optimal disassembly configurations for both single and multiple product types for meeting a specified demand for recovered components and subassemblies. Gungor and Gupta [5] investigated the disassembly line balancing problem (DLBP) in the presence of task failures.
Depth of manual dismantling analysis: A cost-benefit approach
2013, Waste ManagementCitation Excerpt :As evidenced, design parameters usually need to be modified in order to enhance disasseblability. On a CBA basis, one of the first approaches was presented by Gupta (1995) who introduced a technique to analyze the efficiency of designing electronic products for the environment, followed by others who studied optimal dismantling level with the best cost-effectiveness performance (e.g. Meacham et al., 1999; Kaebernick et al., 2000; Kuo, 2000, in press; Lambert, 2007; Vanegas et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012). Disassembly of EEE is still characterized as labor intensive (e.g. Wang et al., 2012; Santochi et al., 2002; Tang et al., 2002).
Multi-objective partial disassembly optimization based on sequence feasibility
2013, Journal of Manufacturing SystemsCitation Excerpt :Constraining the final disassembly level transforms the partial disassembly problem into a complete or selective disassembly problem. The single objective partial disassembly problem has been studied to varying degrees using various methods [9–18]. Harjula et al. [9] studied partial disassembly assuming that the disassembly sequence is the reverse of the assembly sequence, and [10] determined the optimal disassembly sequence using a Petri-net that incorporated the probabilistic success rate of disassembly operations.
Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art
2010, Journal of Environmental ManagementCitation Excerpt :Kim et al. (2009d) propose a branch and bound algorithm for the case of single product type without parts commonality. For the capacitated case, Meacham et al. (1999) present an optimization algorithm by considering common components among products, and limited inventory of products available for disassembly. Lee et al. (2002) develop an IP model based on the minimization of sum of disassembly operation and inventory holding costs.
Disassembly leveling and lot-sizing for multiple product types with uncertain component demands
2023, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture