Optimal disassembly configurations for single and multiple products

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(00)87634-7Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of determining optimal disassembly configurations for single and multiple products, that is, which assemblies and subassemblies to disassemble and which to leave intact. The paper first examines the problem of determining revenue-maximizing disassembly configurations for a single product using the hierarchical product tree representation, and develops a linear time algorithm for its solution. This algorithm is then extended to the case where fixed costs may be associated with disassembly of some nodes in the product tree. Finally, the problem of meeting a specified demand for recovered components and subassemblies from an available inventory of recovered products, where disassembly capacity is limited and products may have common components, is formulated as an optimization problem. A column-generation algorithm for this problem is presented that is capable of solving reasonably sized problems in a few seconds of CPU time on average.

References (27)

  • T.E. Graedel et al.

    Industrial Ecology

    (1995)
  • R.W. Chen et al.

    A Cost-Benefit Analysis Model of Product Design for Recyclability and its Application

    IEEE Trans. on Components, Packaging and Mfg. Technology Part A

    (1994)
  • S.C. Sarson

    The Recycling of Electronic Scrap

    (1992)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Disassembly line balancing under high variety of end of life states using a joint precedence graph approach

      2015, Journal of Manufacturing Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      LB was first considered in assembly settings but the approach can be extended to the application of disassembly [2,3]. Meacham et al. [4] determined the optimal disassembly configurations for both single and multiple product types for meeting a specified demand for recovered components and subassemblies. Gungor and Gupta [5] investigated the disassembly line balancing problem (DLBP) in the presence of task failures.

    • Depth of manual dismantling analysis: A cost-benefit approach

      2013, Waste Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      As evidenced, design parameters usually need to be modified in order to enhance disasseblability. On a CBA basis, one of the first approaches was presented by Gupta (1995) who introduced a technique to analyze the efficiency of designing electronic products for the environment, followed by others who studied optimal dismantling level with the best cost-effectiveness performance (e.g. Meacham et al., 1999; Kaebernick et al., 2000; Kuo, 2000, in press; Lambert, 2007; Vanegas et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012). Disassembly of EEE is still characterized as labor intensive (e.g. Wang et al., 2012; Santochi et al., 2002; Tang et al., 2002).

    • Multi-objective partial disassembly optimization based on sequence feasibility

      2013, Journal of Manufacturing Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      Constraining the final disassembly level transforms the partial disassembly problem into a complete or selective disassembly problem. The single objective partial disassembly problem has been studied to varying degrees using various methods [9–18]. Harjula et al. [9] studied partial disassembly assuming that the disassembly sequence is the reverse of the assembly sequence, and [10] determined the optimal disassembly sequence using a Petri-net that incorporated the probabilistic success rate of disassembly operations.

    • Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art

      2010, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Kim et al. (2009d) propose a branch and bound algorithm for the case of single product type without parts commonality. For the capacitated case, Meacham et al. (1999) present an optimization algorithm by considering common components among products, and limited inventory of products available for disassembly. Lee et al. (2002) develop an IP model based on the minimization of sum of disassembly operation and inventory holding costs.

    • Disassembly leveling and lot-sizing for multiple product types with uncertain component demands

      2023, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text