Technical note
Analytic hierarchy process for robot selection

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(97)88467-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Investment decisions involving robots are capital intensive and are usually made by a committee of experts from different functional backgrounds within a company. In spite of this knowledge, most models in the literature for robot selection assume that there is only a single decision maker. In this paper, a robot selection model that incorporates the inputs from multiple decision makers is provided. This model is based on the analytic hierarchy process method, and both the subjective and objective criteria for robot selection are used. It does not assume that the decision makers have achieved a consensus; that is, they may not agree on evaluations of the robots with respect to each of the criteria. A numerical example is used to illustrate the model.

References (23)

  • M.S. Jones et al.

    Robotics: Decision Support Systems Used for Robot Selection

    Industrial Engineering

    (1985)
  • Cited by (64)

    • An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach based on Bonferroni functions for selection and evaluation of industrial robots for the automobile manufacturing industry

      2023, Expert Systems with Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, according to almost all previous works existing in the literature: the selection of industrial robotics is a highly complex decision-making problem quite affected by uncertainties (Bhattacharya, Sarkar, & Mukherjee, 2005; Fu, Li, Luo, & Huang, 2019), and it is required to use a powerful and applicable tool that can enable to deal with uncertainties for optimally solving these kinds of problems. The most commonly used subjective and objective techniques to solve the industrial robot selection in literature are the AHP (Bhattacharya et al., 2005; Goh, 1997; Seidmann, Arbel, & Shapira, 1984; Tansel Iç, Yurdakul, & Dengiz, 2013), TOPSIS (Agrawal, Kohli, & Gupta, 1991; Bhangale, Agrawal, & Saha, 2004; Ghrayeb, Phojanamongkolkij, Marcellus, & Zhao, 2004; Iç, 2012; Kahraman, Çevik, Ates, & Gülbay, 2007; Parkan & Wu, 1999), ELECTREE (Chatterjee, Athawale, & Chakraborty, 2010), VIKOR (Fu et al., 2019; Garg & Sharma, 2020), PROMETHEE (Sen, Datta, & Mahapatra, 2016), EDAS (Rashid, Ali, & Chu, 2021), DEA (Braglia & Petroni, 1999; Karsak, 1998; Khouja, Rabinowitz, & Mehrez, 1995). As these studies ignored uncertainties, contributions of these previous studies applying objective MCDM techniques, unfortunately, are limited, and their applicability for solving a decision-making problem encountered in real life is also weak.

    • Industrial robot selection using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making

      2019, Robotics and Autonomous Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      The criteria values are estimated by analytical models and simulation. Although the existing studies have realized that the robot selection decision is typically made by a committee or a group of experts with diverse expertise [9,10,30], there exist very few papers that seek to achieve a group wisdom. In other words, almost all of the extant methods in the literature assume that the RSP is handled by a single person.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text