Technical noteAnalytic hierarchy process for robot selection
References (23)
Machine Grouping in Cellular Manufacturing
OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science
(1993)- et al.
A Decision Support System for Robot Selection
- et al.
A Utility Theory Based Robot Selection and Evaluation for Electronics Assembly
Computers & Industrial Engineering
(1988) Design for Automated Assembly of Circular Parts: An Algorithm
International Journal of Production Economics
(1995)- et al.
A Two-Phase Approach to Robotic System Design
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
(1984) Scaling for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
(1977)How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process
European Journal of Operational Research
(1990)- et al.
Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgments
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
(1983) - et al.
The Industrial Robot Selection Problem: Literature Review and Directions for Future Research
IIE Transactions
(1994) - et al.
Robotics: Procedures Given for Evaluating, Selecting Robots
Industrial Engineering
(1994)
Robotics: Decision Support Systems Used for Robot Selection
Industrial Engineering
Cited by (64)
An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach based on Bonferroni functions for selection and evaluation of industrial robots for the automobile manufacturing industry
2023, Expert Systems with ApplicationsCitation Excerpt :Therefore, according to almost all previous works existing in the literature: the selection of industrial robotics is a highly complex decision-making problem quite affected by uncertainties (Bhattacharya, Sarkar, & Mukherjee, 2005; Fu, Li, Luo, & Huang, 2019), and it is required to use a powerful and applicable tool that can enable to deal with uncertainties for optimally solving these kinds of problems. The most commonly used subjective and objective techniques to solve the industrial robot selection in literature are the AHP (Bhattacharya et al., 2005; Goh, 1997; Seidmann, Arbel, & Shapira, 1984; Tansel Iç, Yurdakul, & Dengiz, 2013), TOPSIS (Agrawal, Kohli, & Gupta, 1991; Bhangale, Agrawal, & Saha, 2004; Ghrayeb, Phojanamongkolkij, Marcellus, & Zhao, 2004; Iç, 2012; Kahraman, Çevik, Ates, & Gülbay, 2007; Parkan & Wu, 1999), ELECTREE (Chatterjee, Athawale, & Chakraborty, 2010), VIKOR (Fu et al., 2019; Garg & Sharma, 2020), PROMETHEE (Sen, Datta, & Mahapatra, 2016), EDAS (Rashid, Ali, & Chu, 2021), DEA (Braglia & Petroni, 1999; Karsak, 1998; Khouja, Rabinowitz, & Mehrez, 1995). As these studies ignored uncertainties, contributions of these previous studies applying objective MCDM techniques, unfortunately, are limited, and their applicability for solving a decision-making problem encountered in real life is also weak.
Industrial robot selection using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making
2019, Robotics and Autonomous SystemsCitation Excerpt :The criteria values are estimated by analytical models and simulation. Although the existing studies have realized that the robot selection decision is typically made by a committee or a group of experts with diverse expertise [9,10,30], there exist very few papers that seek to achieve a group wisdom. In other words, almost all of the extant methods in the literature assume that the RSP is handled by a single person.
Selecting industrial robots for milling applications using AHP
2017, Procedia Computer ScienceA de Novo multi-approaches multi-criteria decision making technique with an application in performance evaluation of material handling device
2015, Computers and Industrial EngineeringAn integrated fuzzy MCDM based approach for robot selection considering objective and subjective criteria
2015, Applied Soft Computing JournalThe Construction of an Evaluation Index System for Assistive Teaching Robots Aimed at Sustainable Learning
2023, Sustainability (Switzerland)